• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 19, 1906003 (2023)
Ming Wang1, Hao Feng1, Zhou Sha1、*, and Lipu Du2
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, School of Precision Instrument and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • 2Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Water Conservancy Engineering Construction Center, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP221585 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Ming Wang, Hao Feng, Zhou Sha, Lipu Du. Characteristics of Soil Vibration Propagation Based on Phase Sensitive Optical Time Domain Reflectometers[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(19): 1906003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of φ-OTDR system
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of φ-OTDR system
    Schematic diagram of internal structure of φ-OTDR integrated system
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of internal structure of φ-OTDR integrated system
    Experimental site. (a) Experimental optical path; (b) position of sensing optical cable and experiment; (c) edge auxiliary positioning mark; (d) optical fiber; (e) internal structure of GYTA53 optical cable; (f) internal structure of GJA optical cable
    Fig. 3. Experimental site. (a) Experimental optical path; (b) position of sensing optical cable and experiment; (c) edge auxiliary positioning mark; (d) optical fiber; (e) internal structure of GYTA53 optical cable; (f) internal structure of GJA optical cable
    Comparison of response signals under action of vibration signals
    Fig. 4. Comparison of response signals under action of vibration signals
    Variation of sensitivity with sensing distance. (a) Humidity 1; (b) humidity 2; (c) humidity 3; (d) humidity 4; (e) humidity 5
    Fig. 5. Variation of sensitivity with sensing distance. (a) Humidity 1; (b) humidity 2; (c) humidity 3; (d) humidity 4; (e) humidity 5
    Sensitivity comparison among different humidities. (a) Ball-0.8 m; (b) ball-0.3 m; (c) shovel; (d) motor
    Fig. 6. Sensitivity comparison among different humidities. (a) Ball-0.8 m; (b) ball-0.3 m; (c) shovel; (d) motor
    Curves of response signal of GYTA53. (a) Time domain-static state; (b) frequency domain-static state; (c) time domain-impact state; (d) frequency domain-impact state
    Fig. 7. Curves of response signal of GYTA53. (a) Time domain-static state; (b) frequency domain-static state; (c) time domain-impact state; (d) frequency domain-impact state
    Energy distribution of each frequency band under two states. (a) Ball-0.8 m; (b) ball-0.3 m; (c) shovel; (d) motor
    Fig. 8. Energy distribution of each frequency band under two states. (a) Ball-0.8 m; (b) ball-0.3 m; (c) shovel; (d) motor
    Distribution graphs of s70/40 and s70/20 under two states. (a) s70/40; (b) s70/20
    Fig. 9. Distribution graphs of s70/40 and s70/20 under two states. (a) s70/40; (b) s70/20
    Parameter distributions of two states. (a) r20-40; (b) r40-60; (c) r70-90; (d) s70/40; (e) s70/20
    Fig. 10. Parameter distributions of two states. (a) r20-40; (b) r40-60; (c) r70-90; (d) s70/40; (e) s70/20
    Changes of parameters of continuous signal. (a) r; (b) s; (c) corresponding time-domain curve
    Fig. 11. Changes of parameters of continuous signal. (a) r; (b) s; (c) corresponding time-domain curve
    Values of T1 and T2 under different working conditions
    Fig. 12. Values of T1 and T2 under different working conditions
    Example of suspected vibration point signal. (a) Vibration point signal; (b), (c), (d) non-vibration point signals
    Fig. 13. Example of suspected vibration point signal. (a) Vibration point signal; (b), (c), (d) non-vibration point signals
    Soil environmentHumidity 1Humidity 2Humidity 3Humidity 4Humidity 5
    Water content /%0.055.609.4516.4220.68
    Density /(g·cm-32.422.482.522.572.64
    Table 1. Water content and density of different soil environments
    Data numberActual recordTime domainFrequency domainData numberActual recordTime domainFrequency domain
    100016111
    200017000
    311018000
    401019110
    511120010
    601021000
    700022111
    811123010
    900024000
    1000025000
    1110126111
    1200027000
    1300028000
    1411129111
    1501030000
    Table 2. Judgment results of two methods at a distance of 1 m under dry soil conditions
    Time domain-correct rateTime domain-error rateFrequency domain-correct rateFrequency domain-error rate
    80%20%93.30%6.67%
    Table 3. Summary of experimental results in Table 2
    Working conditionRecord timesTime domainFrequency domainWorking conditionRecord timesTime domainFrequency domain
    11012109202420
    212141210202220
    312131211202520
    412101112202620
    512121213202020
    614181414202321
    720232015202420
    820182016202220
    Table 4. Comparison of judgment results under various working conditions
    Ming Wang, Hao Feng, Zhou Sha, Lipu Du. Characteristics of Soil Vibration Propagation Based on Phase Sensitive Optical Time Domain Reflectometers[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(19): 1906003
    Download Citation