• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 17, Issue 4, 041702 (2019)
Yun Cao, Jichuan Xiong, Xuefeng Liu*, Zhiying Xia, Weize Wang, N. P. Yadav, and Weiping Liu
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic and Optical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201917.041702 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yun Cao, Jichuan Xiong, Xuefeng Liu, Zhiying Xia, Weize Wang, N. P. Yadav, Weiping Liu. Sensing of ultrasonic fields based on polarization parametric indirect microscopic imaging[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(4): 041702 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of a change in polarization status of light through a solid sample in which an ultrasonic wave propagates. Under the influence of the ultrasonic wave (wavelength λu) propagation, the solid is compressed and rarified depending on location and time, which produces nonuniform stress and strain fields. This leads to an anisotropic distribution of the refractive index and produces a phase difference δ of light through the 3D infinitesimal volume element. The phase difference can be detected by our PIMI system.
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of a change in polarization status of light through a solid sample in which an ultrasonic wave propagates. Under the influence of the ultrasonic wave (wavelength λu) propagation, the solid is compressed and rarified depending on location and time, which produces nonuniform stress and strain fields. This leads to an anisotropic distribution of the refractive index and produces a phase difference δ of light through the 3D infinitesimal volume element. The phase difference can be detected by our PIMI system.
    Experimental setup of ultrasonic field sensing. It consists of an ultrasonic excitation system and a PIMI system. The excitation system was employed to generate ultrasonic waves in the sample, and the PIMI system was used to image and characterize the ultrasonic field by extracting variations of optical properties of the sample with and without ultrasonic excitation.
    Fig. 2. Experimental setup of ultrasonic field sensing. It consists of an ultrasonic excitation system and a PIMI system. The excitation system was employed to generate ultrasonic waves in the sample, and the PIMI system was used to image and characterize the ultrasonic field by extracting variations of optical properties of the sample with and without ultrasonic excitation.
    PIMI images under different ultrasonic conditions (a)–(c) without and (d)–(f) with ultrasonic excitation. (a) and (d) Average of polarization intensities Idp, (b) and (e) polarization phase difference sin δ, (c) and (f) polarization angle of slow axis Φ.
    Fig. 3. PIMI images under different ultrasonic conditions (a)–(c) without and (d)–(f) with ultrasonic excitation. (a) and (d) Average of polarization intensities Idp, (b) and (e) polarization phase difference sinδ, (c) and (f) polarization angle of slow axis Φ.
    PIMI images of the Stokes parameters under different ultrasonic conditions (a)–(d) without and (e)–(h) with ultrasonic excitation. (a), (e) S0; (b), (f) S1; (c), (g) S2; (d), (h) S3.
    Fig. 4. PIMI images of the Stokes parameters under different ultrasonic conditions (a)–(d) without and (e)–(h) with ultrasonic excitation. (a), (e) S0; (b), (f) S1; (c), (g) S2; (d), (h) S3.
    Difference between PIMI images without ultrasonic excitation and those with ultrasonic excitation. (a) sin δ, (b) Φ, and (c) S1.
    Fig. 5. Difference between PIMI images without ultrasonic excitation and those with ultrasonic excitation. (a) sinδ, (b) Φ, and (c) S1.
    Image of Φ under different ultrasonic phases. (a) Phase 0, (b) phase π/4, (c) extracted intensity curves along the line in (a) and (b), (d) difference between (a) and Fig. 3(c), (e) difference between (b) and Fig. 3(c), (f) extracted intensity curves along the line in (d) and (e).
    Fig. 6. Image of Φ under different ultrasonic phases. (a) Phase 0, (b) phase π/4, (c) extracted intensity curves along the line in (a) and (b), (d) difference between (a) and Fig. 3(c), (e) difference between (b) and Fig. 3(c), (f) extracted intensity curves along the line in (d) and (e).
    PIMI images under different ultrasonic conditions (a)–(c) without and (d)–(f) with ultrasonic excitation: (a) and (d) sin δ, (b) and (e) Φ, (c) and (f) S1. Difference between the PIMI images without ultrasonic excitation and those with ultrasonic excitation: (g) sin δ, (h) Φ, and (i) S1.
    Fig. 7. PIMI images under different ultrasonic conditions (a)–(c) without and (d)–(f) with ultrasonic excitation: (a) and (d) sinδ, (b) and (e) Φ, (c) and (f) S1. Difference between the PIMI images without ultrasonic excitation and those with ultrasonic excitation: (g) sinδ, (h) Φ, and (i) S1.
    Yun Cao, Jichuan Xiong, Xuefeng Liu, Zhiying Xia, Weize Wang, N. P. Yadav, Weiping Liu. Sensing of ultrasonic fields based on polarization parametric indirect microscopic imaging[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2019, 17(4): 041702
    Download Citation