• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 21, 2128002 (2020)
Shihao Guan1, Guang Yang1、*, Shan Lu2, and Yanyu Fu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Aviation Operations and Services, Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • 2School of Geographic Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.2128002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shihao Guan, Guang Yang, Shan Lu, Yanyu Fu. Multi-Objective Optimization of Hyperspectral Band Selection Based on Attention Mechanism[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 2128002 Copy Citation Text show less
    SENet structure
    Fig. 1. SENet structure
    Band selection model structure
    Fig. 2. Band selection model structure
    True color image and ground truth map of Botswana data set. (a) True color image; (b) ground truth map
    Fig. 3. True color image and ground truth map of Botswana data set. (a) True color image; (b) ground truth map
    True color image and ground truth map of Indian Pines data set. (a) True color image; (b) ground truth map
    Fig. 4. True color image and ground truth map of Indian Pines data set. (a) True color image; (b) ground truth map
    SENet structure in the experiment
    Fig. 5. SENet structure in the experiment
    Overall classification accuracy, training loss, and band weight changes in the Botswana data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) training loss; (c) band weight thermal map
    Fig. 6. Overall classification accuracy, training loss, and band weight changes in the Botswana data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) training loss; (c) band weight thermal map
    Overall classification accuracy, training loss and band weight changes on the Indian Pines data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) training loss; (c) band weight thermal map
    Fig. 7. Overall classification accuracy, training loss and band weight changes on the Indian Pines data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) training loss; (c) band weight thermal map
    Overall classification accuracy, average classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of each algorithm in the Botswana data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) average classification accuracy; (c) Kappa coefficient
    Fig. 8. Overall classification accuracy, average classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of each algorithm in the Botswana data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) average classification accuracy; (c) Kappa coefficient
    Average spectral divergence of each algorithm on the Botswana data set
    Fig. 9. Average spectral divergence of each algorithm on the Botswana data set
    Overall classification accuracy, average classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of each algorithm in the Indian Pines data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) average classification accuracy; (c) Kappa coefficient
    Fig. 10. Overall classification accuracy, average classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of each algorithm in the Indian Pines data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) average classification accuracy; (c) Kappa coefficient
    Average spectral divergence of each algorithm on the Indian Pines data set
    Fig. 11. Average spectral divergence of each algorithm on the Indian Pines data set
    ModuleLayerInput sizeOutput sizeActivation
    Input1×1×b
    Attention moduleFC-1(fully connected layer)1×1×b1×1×(b/16)ReLU
    FC-2(fully connected layer)1×1×(b/16)1×1×bSigmoid
    Encoder-1(autoencoder)1×1×b1×1×256
    BN-1(batch normalization)1×1×2561×1×256ReLU
    Encoder-2(autoencoder)1×1×2561×1×128
    BN-2(batch normalization)1×1×1281×1×128ReLU
    Encoder-3(autoencoder)1×1×1281×1×64
    BN-3(batch normalization)1×1×641×1×64ReLU
    Reconstruction moduleEncoder-4(autoencoder)1×1×641×1×64
    BN-4(batch normalization)1×1×641×1×64ReLU
    Decoder-1(autoencoder)1×1×641×1×128
    BN-5(batch normalization)1×1×1281×1×128ReLU
    Decoder-2(autoencoder)1×1×1281×1×256
    BN-6(batch normalization)1×1×2561×1×256ReLU
    Decoder-3(autoencoder)1×1×2561×1×bSigmoid
    Classification moduleLatent vector1×1×641×1×64
    FC-3(fully connected layer)1×1×64Number of classSoftmax
    Table 1. Data size and activation function change in the model
    ItemBotswanaIndian Pines
    Shooting areaOkavango Delta, BotswanaIndiana, USA
    Imaging spectrometerHyperionAVIRIS
    Spectral range /nm400-2500400-2500
    Number of wavelengths (remove strong noise and water vapor band)145200
    Image size /(pixel×pixel)1476×256145×145
    Spatial resolution /m3020
    Sample size324810249
    Object types1416
    Table 2. Hyperspectral image data set
    γBotswanaIndian Pines
    OA /%AA /%KappaOA /%AA /%Kappa
    0.188.989.50.87373.171.40.708
    0.389.389.80.88673.671.50.706
    0.588.687.10.86974.370.40.712
    0.787.286.80.85372.169.50.698
    0.985.386.70.83969.766.10.664
    Table 3. Experimental results of two data sets with different weight coefficients
    Shihao Guan, Guang Yang, Shan Lu, Yanyu Fu. Multi-Objective Optimization of Hyperspectral Band Selection Based on Attention Mechanism[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(21): 2128002
    Download Citation