Author Affiliations
1School of Aviation Operations and Services, Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China2School of Geographic Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130024, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. SENet structure
Fig. 2. Band selection model structure
Fig. 3. True color image and ground truth map of Botswana data set. (a) True color image; (b) ground truth map
Fig. 4. True color image and ground truth map of Indian Pines data set. (a) True color image; (b) ground truth map
Fig. 5. SENet structure in the experiment
Fig. 6. Overall classification accuracy, training loss, and band weight changes in the Botswana data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) training loss; (c) band weight thermal map
Fig. 7. Overall classification accuracy, training loss and band weight changes on the Indian Pines data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) training loss; (c) band weight thermal map
Fig. 8. Overall classification accuracy, average classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of each algorithm in the Botswana data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) average classification accuracy; (c) Kappa coefficient
Fig. 9. Average spectral divergence of each algorithm on the Botswana data set
Fig. 10. Overall classification accuracy, average classification accuracy and Kappa coefficient of each algorithm in the Indian Pines data set. (a) Overall classification accuracy; (b) average classification accuracy; (c) Kappa coefficient
Fig. 11. Average spectral divergence of each algorithm on the Indian Pines data set
Module | Layer | Input size | Output size | Activation |
---|
| Input | | 1×1×b | | Attention module | FC-1(fully connected layer) | 1×1×b | 1×1×(b/16) | ReLU | | FC-2(fully connected layer) | 1×1×(b/16) | 1×1×b | Sigmoid | | Encoder-1(autoencoder) | 1×1×b | 1×1×256 | | | BN-1(batch normalization) | 1×1×256 | 1×1×256 | ReLU | | Encoder-2(autoencoder) | 1×1×256 | 1×1×128 | | | BN-2(batch normalization) | 1×1×128 | 1×1×128 | ReLU | | Encoder-3(autoencoder) | 1×1×128 | 1×1×64 | | | BN-3(batch normalization) | 1×1×64 | 1×1×64 | ReLU | Reconstruction module | Encoder-4(autoencoder) | 1×1×64 | 1×1×64 | | | BN-4(batch normalization) | 1×1×64 | 1×1×64 | ReLU | | Decoder-1(autoencoder) | 1×1×64 | 1×1×128 | | | BN-5(batch normalization) | 1×1×128 | 1×1×128 | ReLU | | Decoder-2(autoencoder) | 1×1×128 | 1×1×256 | | | BN-6(batch normalization) | 1×1×256 | 1×1×256 | ReLU | | Decoder-3(autoencoder) | 1×1×256 | 1×1×b | Sigmoid | Classification module | Latent vector | 1×1×64 | 1×1×64 | | | FC-3(fully connected layer) | 1×1×64 | Number of class | Softmax |
|
Table 1. Data size and activation function change in the model
Item | Botswana | Indian Pines |
---|
Shooting area | Okavango Delta, Botswana | Indiana, USA | Imaging spectrometer | Hyperion | AVIRIS | Spectral range /nm | 400-2500 | 400-2500 | Number of wavelengths (remove strong noise and water vapor band) | 145 | 200 | Image size /(pixel×pixel) | 1476×256 | 145×145 | Spatial resolution /m | 30 | 20 | Sample size | 3248 | 10249 | Object types | 14 | 16 |
|
Table 2. Hyperspectral image data set
γ | Botswana | Indian Pines | |
---|
OA /% | AA /% | Kappa | OA /% | AA /% | Kappa |
---|
0.1 | 88.9 | 89.5 | 0.873 | 73.1 | 71.4 | 0.708 | 0.3 | 89.3 | 89.8 | 0.886 | 73.6 | 71.5 | 0.706 | 0.5 | 88.6 | 87.1 | 0.869 | 74.3 | 70.4 | 0.712 | 0.7 | 87.2 | 86.8 | 0.853 | 72.1 | 69.5 | 0.698 | 0.9 | 85.3 | 86.7 | 0.839 | 69.7 | 66.1 | 0.664 |
|
Table 3. Experimental results of two data sets with different weight coefficients