Author Affiliations
1College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China2School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of experimental methods
Fig. 2. Transmission electron microscope images of loose and compact BC single particles with different mixing structures. (a1)-(a3) Loose BC particles; (b1)-(b3) compact BC particles
Fig. 3. BC single particle models constructed by EMBS with different coating thickness and coating degree. (a) BC single particle models with Df=1.8; (b) BC single particle models with Df=2.6
Fig. 4. Eabs of BC single particles with different mixing structures calculated by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods. (a) Eabs obtained by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=1.8; (b) Eabs obtained by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=2.6
Fig. 5. SSA of BC single particles with different mixing structures calculated by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods. (a) SSA of DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=1.8; (b) SSA of DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=2.6
Fig. 6. Absorption cross section Cabs and absorption efficiency Qabs of BC single particles without coating (Df=2.6). (a) Absorption cross section Cabs of BC; (b) absorption efficiency Qabs of BC
Fig. 7. Eabs, Cabs, and SSA of BC single particles (Df=2.6, Dp/Dc=2.3, and F=1.00). (a) Eabs; (b) Cabs; (c) SSA
Fig. 8. Eabs, Cabs, and SSA when Df =2.6, Dp/Dc=2.3, and F=0.50. (a) Eabs; (b) Cabs; (c) SSA