• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 43, Issue 6, 0601004 (2023)
Zheyuan Fan1、2, Yuanyuan Wang2、*, Weijun Li2, Mingzhou Yu1, and Yuner Pang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
  • 2School of Earth Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS221291 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zheyuan Fan, Yuanyuan Wang, Weijun Li, Mingzhou Yu, Yuner Pang. Difference in Optical Properties of Black Carbon Aerosols Simulated by Different Numerical Models[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 0601004 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of experimental methods
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of experimental methods
    Transmission electron microscope images of loose and compact BC single particles with different mixing structures. (a1)-(a3) Loose BC particles; (b1)-(b3) compact BC particles
    Fig. 2. Transmission electron microscope images of loose and compact BC single particles with different mixing structures. (a1)-(a3) Loose BC particles; (b1)-(b3) compact BC particles
    BC single particle models constructed by EMBS with different coating thickness and coating degree. (a) BC single particle models with Df=1.8; (b) BC single particle models with Df=2.6
    Fig. 3. BC single particle models constructed by EMBS with different coating thickness and coating degree. (a) BC single particle models with Df=1.8; (b) BC single particle models with Df=2.6
    Eabs of BC single particles with different mixing structures calculated by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods. (a) Eabs obtained by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=1.8; (b) Eabs obtained by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=2.6
    Fig. 4. Eabs of BC single particles with different mixing structures calculated by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods. (a) Eabs obtained by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=1.8; (b) Eabs obtained by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=2.6
    SSA of BC single particles with different mixing structures calculated by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods. (a) SSA of DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=1.8; (b) SSA of DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=2.6
    Fig. 5. SSA of BC single particles with different mixing structures calculated by DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods. (a) SSA of DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=1.8; (b) SSA of DDA, MSTM, and Mie methods when Df=2.6
    Absorption cross section Cabs and absorption efficiency Qabs of BC single particles without coating (Df=2.6). (a) Absorption cross section Cabs of BC; (b) absorption efficiency Qabs of BC
    Fig. 6. Absorption cross section Cabs and absorption efficiency Qabs of BC single particles without coating (Df=2.6). (a) Absorption cross section Cabs of BC; (b) absorption efficiency Qabs of BC
    Eabs, Cabs, and SSA of BC single particles (Df=2.6, Dp/Dc=2.3, and F=1.00). (a) Eabs; (b) Cabs; (c) SSA
    Fig. 7. Eabs, Cabs, and SSA of BC single particles (Df=2.6, Dp/Dc=2.3, and F=1.00). (a) Eabs; (b) Cabs; (c) SSA
    Eabs, Cabs, and SSA when Df =2.6, Dp/Dc=2.3, and F=0.50. (a) Eabs; (b) Cabs; (c) SSA
    Fig. 8. Eabs, Cabs, and SSA when Df =2.6, Dp/Dc=2.3, and F=0.50. (a) Eabs; (b) Cabs; (c) SSA
    Zheyuan Fan, Yuanyuan Wang, Weijun Li, Mingzhou Yu, Yuner Pang. Difference in Optical Properties of Black Carbon Aerosols Simulated by Different Numerical Models[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2023, 43(6): 0601004
    Download Citation