Author Affiliations
Huazhong Institute of Electro-Optics, Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430223, Hubei, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. The process of making the optical lens. (a) Self-designed single glued lens; (b) PSF of lens at 20° FOV
Fig. 2. Deep iterative adaptive convolution
Fig. 3. Deblurring network with DIFAN
Fig. 4. Comparison of different restoration methods based on simulation dataset. (a) Original blurred image; (b) recovery results of ISD-Deblur; (c) recovery results of DeblurGAN-v2 ; (d) recovery results of proposed DIFAN; (e) ground truth images
Fig. 5. Comparison of network restoration effects based on simulation datasets at different field angles
Fig. 6. Network restoration effect of simulation data set with a plano-convex lens at 15° field of view angle
Fig. 7. Distortion correction and display-capture experiments
Fig. 8. Image pairs taken using display capture devices
Fig. 9. Experimental results. (a) The original blurred images; (b) image recovery results from the network; (c) ground truth images
DIFAN | Evaluations on the DPDD-SL dataset[24] | Computational costs |
---|
PSNR↑ | SSIM↑ | MAE↓ | LPIPS↓ | Params /106 | MACs /109 |
---|
FP | 23.88 | 0.723 | 0.041 | 0.368 | 10.57 | 364.3 | FP+DIAC | 25.78 | 0.789 | 0.035 | 0.280 | FP+DIAC+BPR | 26.37 | 0.824 | 0.032 | 0.232 | 10.47 | 419.5 | FP+DIAC+BPR+RBN | 26.94 | 0.847 | 0.029 | 0.221 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of ablation studies
Model | Evaluations on the DPDD-SL dataset | Computational costs |
---|
PSNR↑ | SSIM↑ | MAE↓ | LPIPS↓ | Params /106 | MACs /109 | Time /s |
---|
Original | 22.15 | 0.717 | 0.049 | 0.331 | | | | ISD-Deblur[28] | 23.78 | 0.75 | 0.039 | 0.369 | | | 45 | Deblur-Ganv2[7] | 26.01 | 0.82 | 0.028 | 0.319 | 33.15 | 858.5 | 2.67 | Proposed model | 26.94 | 0.847 | 0.029 | 0.221 | 10.47 | 419.5 | 0.677 |
|
Table 2. Quantitative comparisons of reconstruction performance
Experiment | Evaluations on the DPDD-SL data |
---|
PSNR↑ | SSIM↑ | MAE↓ | LPIPS↓ |
---|
15° FOV flat-convex lens | 30.5241 | 0.88427 | 0.01859 | 0.10433 | 20° FOV single glued lens | 26.9425 | 0.84679 | 0.02904 | 0.22172 | 36° FOV single glued lens | 23.6107 | 0.76617 | 0.04471 | 0.32384 |
|
Table 3. Quantitative comparison of DIFAN restoration comparison experiments under different field of view angles
Model | PSNR↑ | SSIM↑ |
---|
Original | 24.4386 | 0.6278 | Multiscale | 25.0048 | 0.6859 | Fov-GAN | 25.2653 | 0.7486 | Deblur-GAN[7] | 28.0252 | 0.7843 | RRG-GAN[16] | 30.4102 | 0.8650 | Proposed DIAN | 30.5241 | 0.8842 |
|
Table 4. Quantitative comparison of comparative experiments of different network restoration methods under 15° field of view angle of plano-convex lens