• Infrared and Laser Engineering
  • Vol. 51, Issue 12, 20220238 (2022)
Xiaojie Zhang1,2,3, Wei Wei1,2,3,*, Yonghui Hou1,2, Yong Zhang1,2..., Hangxin Ji1,2, Xiaofei Li1,2, Qishuai Lu1,2, Kang Huang1,2,3 and Yuyao Liu1,2,3|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1National Astronomical Observatories/Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210042, China
  • 2CAS Key Laboratory of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics & Technology, Nanjing 210042, China
  • 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/IRLA20220238 Cite this Article
    Xiaojie Zhang, Wei Wei, Yonghui Hou, Yong Zhang, Hangxin Ji, Xiaofei Li, Qishuai Lu, Kang Huang, Yuyao Liu. Defocus diagnosis method of LAMOST spectrograph based on multi-object image definition evaluation[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(12): 20220238 Copy Citation Text show less
    Diagram of LAMOST auto-focusing camera system structure
    Fig. 1. Diagram of LAMOST auto-focusing camera system structure
    A part of the LAMOST spectrometer calibration lamp spectrum
    Fig. 2. A part of the LAMOST spectrometer calibration lamp spectrum
    (a) Normal spots; (b) Pixel depth distribution curve about normal spots in the Y direction; (c) Spots of slightly defocus; (d) Pixel depth distribution curve about spots of slightly defocus in the Y direction; (e) Spots of excessively defocus; (f) Pixel depth distribution curve about normal spots in the Y direction
    Fig. 3. (a) Normal spots; (b) Pixel depth distribution curve about normal spots in the Y direction; (c) Spots of slightly defocus; (d) Pixel depth distribution curve about spots of slightly defocus in the Y direction; (e) Spots of excessively defocus; (f) Pixel depth distribution curve about normal spots in the Y direction
    Flow chart of spots information acquisition
    Fig. 4. Flow chart of spots information acquisition
    (a) Fitting comparison of normal spots in the Y direction; (b) Fitting comparison of slghtly defocus spots in the Y direction; (c) Fitting comparison of excessively defocus spots in the Y direction
    Fig. 5. (a) Fitting comparison of normal spots in the Y direction; (b) Fitting comparison of slghtly defocus spots in the Y direction; (c) Fitting comparison of excessively defocus spots in the Y direction
    (a) FWHM distribution of all spots under the normal condition; (b) FWHM distribution of all spots in the defocus
    Fig. 6. (a) FWHM distribution of all spots under the normal condition; (b) FWHM distribution of all spots in the defocus
    Relational graph of X-RSS, Y-RSS and Δf
    Fig. 7. Relational graph of X-RSS, Y-RSS and Δf
    Diagram of defocus function model
    Fig. 8. Diagram of defocus function model
    Comparison diagram of normalized image definition evaluation curve
    Fig. 9. Comparison diagram of normalized image definition evaluation curve
    Results of defocus diagnosis
    Fig. 10. Results of defocus diagnosis
    Function modelR2 of three types of spots
    NormalSlightly defocusExcessively defocus
    Fourier10.910.970.82
    20.980.980.98
    30.990.980.98
    Polynomial10.0200
    20.520.730.82
    30.590.730.83
    Sum of sine10.620.800.82
    20.980.970.95
    30.990.980.98
    GMM10.980.970.76
    20.980.980.98
    30.990.980.98
    Table 1. R2 of three types of spots under the different terms of four functional models
    Spot typeFWHM theoretical value Function model
    GMMFourierSum of sinePolynomial
    Normal5.45.35.24.99.4
    Slightly defocus 6.56.46.66.68.4
    Excessively defocus 10.610.110.410.411.3
    Table 2. FWHM values of three types of spots under four functional models
    Defocusing distance/μm02550100125150175
    Number of spots553544537468402251150
    Table 3. The number of spots identified by spectra at different defocus amount
    MethodRMSEαβ
    Roberts1.410.1803
    DCT1.670.5503
    Entropy1.040.862
    Vollaths2.230.2202
    Multi-objective108.300.1703
    Table 4. The comparison of image definition function evaluation criterion
    Xiaojie Zhang, Wei Wei, Yonghui Hou, Yong Zhang, Hangxin Ji, Xiaofei Li, Qishuai Lu, Kang Huang, Yuyao Liu. Defocus diagnosis method of LAMOST spectrograph based on multi-object image definition evaluation[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(12): 20220238
    Download Citation