• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 7, 0712003 (2023)
Cuili Mao1、2 and Rongsheng Lu1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui, China
  • 2School of Intelligent Manufacturing, Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473004, Henan, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP212939 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Cuili Mao, Rongsheng Lu. A New Method for 3D Shape Reconstruction with a High Dynamic Range Surface[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(7): 0712003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Captured fringe intensity distribution. (a) Unsaturated fringe pattern; (b) saturated fringe pattern
    Fig. 1. Captured fringe intensity distribution. (a) Unsaturated fringe pattern; (b) saturated fringe pattern
    Grating fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes
    Fig. 2. Grating fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes
    Gray distribution curves of a line of fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes
    Fig. 3. Gray distribution curves of a line of fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes
    Unwrapped phase values of a line with different fringes
    Fig. 4. Unwrapped phase values of a line with different fringes
    Grating fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes when signal-to-noise ratio is 30 dB
    Fig. 5. Grating fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes when signal-to-noise ratio is 30 dB
    Unwrapping phase error curves with different intensity amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios. (a)-(d) Signal-to-noise ratios are 25, 30, 35, and 40 dB, respectively
    Fig. 6. Unwrapping phase error curves with different intensity amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios. (a)-(d) Signal-to-noise ratios are 25, 30, 35, and 40 dB, respectively
    Standard deviation curves of phase error with different signal-to-noise ratios and fringe amplitudes
    Fig. 7. Standard deviation curves of phase error with different signal-to-noise ratios and fringe amplitudes
    Experimental system
    Fig. 8. Experimental system
    Fringe patterns with different amplitudes obtained from experiments
    Fig. 9. Fringe patterns with different amplitudes obtained from experiments
    Unwrapped phases of different fringe amplitudes at f = 4
    Fig. 10. Unwrapped phases of different fringe amplitudes at f = 4
    Phase error curves of different fringe amplitudes
    Fig. 11. Phase error curves of different fringe amplitudes
    Phase error curves excluding intensity amplitude of 255
    Fig. 12. Phase error curves excluding intensity amplitude of 255
    Standard deviation curve of phase error with different projection fringe amplitudes
    Fig. 13. Standard deviation curve of phase error with different projection fringe amplitudes
    Measured object with high dynamic range
    Fig. 14. Measured object with high dynamic range
    Captured fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes of projected fringe. (a) Imax=200; (b) Imax=250
    Fig. 15. Captured fringe patterns with different intensity amplitudes of projected fringe. (a) Imax=200; (b) Imax=250
    3D point cloud of measured object surface. (a) When projecting low amplitude fringes; (b) when projecting high amplitude fringes; (c) fused measurements
    Fig. 16. 3D point cloud of measured object surface. (a) When projecting low amplitude fringes; (b) when projecting high amplitude fringes; (c) fused measurements
    Signal-to-noise ratio /dBFringe amplitude
    100120140160180200220255
    250.07240.07810.06610.05910.08340.04210.07240.0524
    300.03530.03520.03550.03480.03500.03510.03490.0350
    350.02040.01990.02010.02020.01990.02000.01970.0199
    400.01240.01230.01210.01180.01180.01170.01170.0115
    Table 1. Standard deviation of phase error under different projection fringe amplitudes and signal-to-noise ratios
    Fringe intensity amplitude100120140160180200220255
    Standard deviation0.06150.06180.06190.06180.06160.06290.06240.0740
    Table 2. Standard deviation of phase errors under different fringe intensity amplitudes
    rr<0.60.6r1r>1r<0.6,0.6r10.6r1,r>1r<0.6,0.6r1,r>1
    Amplitude255250200250250,200250,200
    Table 3. Best fringe intensity amplitude with different r
    Cuili Mao, Rongsheng Lu. A New Method for 3D Shape Reconstruction with a High Dynamic Range Surface[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(7): 0712003
    Download Citation