Author Affiliations
1 School of Electronics and Information Technology, Communication University of Zhejiang, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China2 Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. ECEF coordinate system
Fig. 2. ECEF coordinate and NED coordinate sysems
Fig. 3. NED and AC coordinate systems
Fig. 4. Structural diagram of airborne electro-optical platform
Fig. 5. Schematic of target projection on detector
Fig. 6. Flow chart of extended Kalman filtering
Fig. 7. Flight path and measurement points in simulation
Fig. 8. Simulation test. (a) Geo-location results; (b) geo-location errors
Fig. 9. Influence of initial position guess on target geo-location accuracy
Fig. 10. Influence of flight path on target geo-location accuracy. (a) Flight paths; (b) target geo-location error under different flight paths
Fig. 11. Influence of error parameter on target geo-location accuracy. (a) Position error; (b) line of sight direction error
Fig. 12. Flight test. (a) Small-scale airborne electro-optical platform; (b) flight path
Fig. 13. Flight test. (a) Geo-location results; (b) geo-location errors
Symbol | Standard deviation |
---|
| φA /(°) | 0.0001(10 m) | Aircraft geographical position | λA /(°) | 0.00014(10 m) | | hA /m | 10 | | ψ /(°) | 0.08 | Aircraft attitude | θ /(°) | 0.03 | | κ /(°) | 0.03 | Shock absorber | δroll /(°) | 0.50 | | δpitch /(°) | 0.50 | Gimbal angle | α /(°) | 0.01 | | β /(°) | 0.01 |
|
Table 1. Error parameters in simulation