Yang Liu, De-Hua Zhang, Jing-Fei Xin, Yudong Pu, Jun Li, Tao Tao, Dejun Sun, Rui Yan, Jian Zheng. Growth of ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability induced by time-varying heat-flux perturbation[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2024, 9(1): 016603

Search by keywords or author
- Matter and Radiation at Extremes
- Vol. 9, Issue 1, 016603 (2024)

Fig. 1. Simulation setup for λ = 70 μ m and V a = 3.5 μ m/ns: (a) initial density profile; (b) temperature fluctuations at t = 0.08 ns; (c) initial profiles of ρ (solid), T (dot-dashed), and v z (dashed) along z axis.
![(a) Ratio of bubble velocity to corresponding classical value Ucl2D and (b) linear growth rate of ablative Rayleigh–Taylor instability (ARTI) induced by stationary heat-flux (SHF) perturbation for different λ with Va = 3.5 μm/ns. The linear growth rates are shown for the simulation results (red triangles) and those obtained theoretically using the improved Takabe-like formula [Eq. (1)] (pink dot-dashed line) and the formula based on stability theory [Eq. (2)] (black solid line). (c) x-averaged temperature perturbation amplitude vs z penetration distance induced by SHF perturbation for three cases with different λ at t ≈ 0.5 ns.](/richHtml/MRE/2024/9/1/016603/img_2.jpg)
Fig. 2. (a) Ratio of bubble velocity to corresponding classical value U cl 2D and (b) linear growth rate of ablative Rayleigh–Taylor instability (ARTI) induced by stationary heat-flux (SHF) perturbation for different λ with V a = 3.5 μ m/ns. The linear growth rates are shown for the simulation results (red triangles) and those obtained theoretically using the improved Takabe-like formula [Eq. (1) ] (pink dot-dashed line) and the formula based on stability theory [Eq. (2) ] (black solid line). (c) x -averaged temperature perturbation amplitude vs z penetration distance induced by SHF perturbation for three cases with different λ at t ≈ 0.5 ns.

Fig. 3. Density contours of ARTI induced by time-varying heat-flux (TVHF) perturbation for different τ with λ = 70 μ m and V a = 3.5 μ m/ns at t ≈ 5.0 ns. The perturbation periods are (a) τ = 0.05 ns, (b) τ = 0.1 ns, (c) τ = 0.2 ns, (d) τ = 0.5 ns, and (e) τ = 1.0 ns, and (f) is for SHF perturbation.

Fig. 4. Temporal evolution of bubble velocity for ARTI induced by TVHF and SHF perturbations for (a) λ = 70 μ m, (b) λ = 50 μ m, and (c) λ = 30 μ m with V a = 3.5 μ m/ns.

Fig. 5. (a) Simulation (red triangles) and theoretical (black solid line) results for linear growth rate and (b) average effective acceleration (blue dots) and ablation pressure (red squares) in linear stage of ARTI induced by TVHF perturbation for different τ with λ = 70 μ m and V a = 3.5 μ m/ns. (c) Profiles of average heat flux along z direction for three different configurations at t ≈ 2.0 ns.

Fig. 6. Linear growth rate of ARTI vs phase velocity of TVHF perturbation for different λ and V a : (a) V a = 2.0 μ m/ns; (b) V a = 3.5 μ m/ns; (c) V a = 5.0 μ m/ns. Pink circles: λ = 30 μ m; blue triangles: λ = 50 μ m; red squares: λ = 70 μ m. The red dashed line represents the corresponding characteristic sound speed in the ablation region for each V a .

Fig. 7. Average phase difference of density and temperature fluctuations traveling along x direction in ablation region with λ = 70 μ m and V a = 3.5 μ m/ns during t = 0–2 ns.

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address