• Matter and Radiation at Extremes
  • Vol. 9, Issue 1, 016603 (2024)
Yang Liu1,2, De-Hua Zhang1, Jing-Fei Xin1, Yudong Pu3..., Jun Li4, Tao Tao5, Dejun Sun1, Rui Yan1,6,a) and Jian Zheng5,6,7|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 2Deep Space Exploration Laboratory, Hefei 230026, China
  • 3Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621900, China
  • 4Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China
  • 5Department of Plasma Physics and Fusion Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 6Collaborative Innovation Center of IFSA (CICIFSA), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 7CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai 201800, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1063/5.0157344 Cite this Article
    Yang Liu, De-Hua Zhang, Jing-Fei Xin, Yudong Pu, Jun Li, Tao Tao, Dejun Sun, Rui Yan, Jian Zheng. Growth of ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability induced by time-varying heat-flux perturbation[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2024, 9(1): 016603 Copy Citation Text show less
    Simulation setup for λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns: (a) initial density profile; (b) temperature fluctuations at t = 0.08 ns; (c) initial profiles of ρ (solid), T (dot-dashed), and vz (dashed) along z axis.
    Fig. 1. Simulation setup for λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns: (a) initial density profile; (b) temperature fluctuations at t = 0.08 ns; (c) initial profiles of ρ (solid), T (dot-dashed), and vz (dashed) along z axis.
    (a) Ratio of bubble velocity to corresponding classical value Ucl2D and (b) linear growth rate of ablative Rayleigh–Taylor instability (ARTI) induced by stationary heat-flux (SHF) perturbation for different λ with Va = 3.5 μm/ns. The linear growth rates are shown for the simulation results (red triangles) and those obtained theoretically using the improved Takabe-like formula [Eq. (1)] (pink dot-dashed line) and the formula based on stability theory [Eq. (2)] (black solid line). (c) x-averaged temperature perturbation amplitude vs z penetration distance induced by SHF perturbation for three cases with different λ at t ≈ 0.5 ns.
    Fig. 2. (a) Ratio of bubble velocity to corresponding classical value Ucl2D and (b) linear growth rate of ablative Rayleigh–Taylor instability (ARTI) induced by stationary heat-flux (SHF) perturbation for different λ with Va = 3.5 μm/ns. The linear growth rates are shown for the simulation results (red triangles) and those obtained theoretically using the improved Takabe-like formula [Eq. (1)] (pink dot-dashed line) and the formula based on stability theory [Eq. (2)] (black solid line). (c) x-averaged temperature perturbation amplitude vs z penetration distance induced by SHF perturbation for three cases with different λ at t ≈ 0.5 ns.
    Density contours of ARTI induced by time-varying heat-flux (TVHF) perturbation for different τ with λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns at t ≈ 5.0 ns. The perturbation periods are (a) τ = 0.05 ns, (b) τ = 0.1 ns, (c) τ = 0.2 ns, (d) τ = 0.5 ns, and (e) τ = 1.0 ns, and (f) is for SHF perturbation.
    Fig. 3. Density contours of ARTI induced by time-varying heat-flux (TVHF) perturbation for different τ with λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns at t ≈ 5.0 ns. The perturbation periods are (a) τ = 0.05 ns, (b) τ = 0.1 ns, (c) τ = 0.2 ns, (d) τ = 0.5 ns, and (e) τ = 1.0 ns, and (f) is for SHF perturbation.
    Temporal evolution of bubble velocity for ARTI induced by TVHF and SHF perturbations for (a) λ = 70 μm, (b) λ = 50 μm, and (c) λ = 30 μm with Va = 3.5 μm/ns.
    Fig. 4. Temporal evolution of bubble velocity for ARTI induced by TVHF and SHF perturbations for (a) λ = 70 μm, (b) λ = 50 μm, and (c) λ = 30 μm with Va = 3.5 μm/ns.
    (a) Simulation (red triangles) and theoretical (black solid line) results for linear growth rate and (b) average effective acceleration (blue dots) and ablation pressure (red squares) in linear stage of ARTI induced by TVHF perturbation for different τ with λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns. (c) Profiles of average heat flux along z direction for three different configurations at t ≈ 2.0 ns.
    Fig. 5. (a) Simulation (red triangles) and theoretical (black solid line) results for linear growth rate and (b) average effective acceleration (blue dots) and ablation pressure (red squares) in linear stage of ARTI induced by TVHF perturbation for different τ with λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns. (c) Profiles of average heat flux along z direction for three different configurations at t ≈ 2.0 ns.
    Linear growth rate of ARTI vs phase velocity of TVHF perturbation for different λ and Va: (a) Va = 2.0 μm/ns; (b) Va = 3.5 μm/ns; (c) Va = 5.0 μm/ns. Pink circles: λ = 30 μm; blue triangles: λ = 50 μm; red squares: λ = 70 μm. The red dashed line represents the corresponding characteristic sound speed in the ablation region for each Va.
    Fig. 6. Linear growth rate of ARTI vs phase velocity of TVHF perturbation for different λ and Va: (a) Va = 2.0 μm/ns; (b) Va = 3.5 μm/ns; (c) Va = 5.0 μm/ns. Pink circles: λ = 30 μm; blue triangles: λ = 50 μm; red squares: λ = 70 μm. The red dashed line represents the corresponding characteristic sound speed in the ablation region for each Va.
    Average phase difference of density and temperature fluctuations traveling along x direction in ablation region with λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns during t = 0–2 ns.
    Fig. 7. Average phase difference of density and temperature fluctuations traveling along x direction in ablation region with λ = 70 μm and Va = 3.5 μm/ns during t = 0–2 ns.
    Yang Liu, De-Hua Zhang, Jing-Fei Xin, Yudong Pu, Jun Li, Tao Tao, Dejun Sun, Rui Yan, Jian Zheng. Growth of ablative Rayleigh-Taylor instability induced by time-varying heat-flux perturbation[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2024, 9(1): 016603
    Download Citation