• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 12, 1215013 (2022)
Yingjie Xue1, Qi Chen1, Songbin Zhou2、*, Yisen Liu2, and Wei Han2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Faculty of Information Engineering and Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, Yunnan , China
  • 2Institute of Intelligent Manufacturing, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Modern Control Technology, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.1215013 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yingjie Xue, Qi Chen, Songbin Zhou, Yisen Liu, Wei Han. Mechanical Abnormal Sound Detection Based on Self-Supervised Feature Extraction[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(12): 1215013 Copy Citation Text show less
    Process of self-supervised feature extraction
    Fig. 1. Process of self-supervised feature extraction
    Power spectrum of pink noise
    Fig. 2. Power spectrum of pink noise
    Process of pink noise generation by Matlab
    Fig. 3. Process of pink noise generation by Matlab
    Flowchart of deeply separable convolution
    Fig. 4. Flowchart of deeply separable convolution
    Structure of Bottleneck module
    Fig. 5. Structure of Bottleneck module
    Structure diagram of AE
    Fig. 6. Structure diagram of AE
    Flowchart of abnormal sound detection for mechanical equipment
    Fig. 7. Flowchart of abnormal sound detection for mechanical equipment
    Time-frequency spectra of test sets of normal sound samples and abnormal sound samples
    Fig. 8. Time-frequency spectra of test sets of normal sound samples and abnormal sound samples
    Time-frequency spectra of generating abnormal samples
    Fig. 9. Time-frequency spectra of generating abnormal samples
    Visualization of original time-frequency characteristics of test samples
    Fig. 10. Visualization of original time-frequency characteristics of test samples
    Visualization of test sample self-supervised feature extraction
    Fig. 11. Visualization of test sample self-supervised feature extraction
    AUC results of six feature extraction methods for anomaly detection
    Fig. 12. AUC results of six feature extraction methods for anomaly detection
    OperatorExpansion factorChannelRepeated timesStride
    Conv2D-1612
    Bottleneck1811
    Bottleneck61622
    Bottleneck61632
    Bottleneck63242
    Bottleneck64831
    Bottleneck68032
    Bottleneck616011
    Conv2D-128011
    Avg pool-12801-
    Table 1. Network structure of MoblienetV2
    TypeNumber of samples in training setsNumber of normal samples in testing setsNumber of abnormal samples in testing sets
    Slider2804400890
    Valve3291400479
    Pump3349400456
    Fan36754001475
    Table 2. Data partition of four kinds of machine sound
    ModelSlider DAUC /%Valve DAUC /%Pump DAUC /%Fan DAUC /%Average DAUC /%
    SSFE-IF94.685.282.974.584.3
    SSFE-Kmeans93.882.780.273.782.6
    SSFE-OCSVM85.678.874.565.376.1
    SSFE-GMM94.589.987.676.887.2
    SSFE-DAGMM94.591.388.578.188.1
    SSFE-CAE94.891.289.078.288.3
    SSFE-AE95.092.788.278.088.5
    Table 3. Performance comparison of different anomaly detection models
    Yingjie Xue, Qi Chen, Songbin Zhou, Yisen Liu, Wei Han. Mechanical Abnormal Sound Detection Based on Self-Supervised Feature Extraction[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(12): 1215013
    Download Citation