Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators

Zhitong Cui; Wei Chen; Yayun Dong; Xin Nie; Wei Wu; Feng Qin

doi:10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406

Journals >High Power Laser and Particle Beams >Volume 34 >Issue 2 >Page 023002 > Article

High Power Laser and Particle Beams
Vol. 34, Issue 2, 023002 (2022)

Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators

Zhitong Cui, Wei Chen, Yayun Dong, Xin Nie, Wei Wu, and Feng Qin

Author Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China

show less

DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406 Cite this Article

Zhitong Cui, Wei Chen, Yayun Dong, Xin Nie, Wei Wu, Feng Qin. Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(2): 023002 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Requirements of calibration setup and waveform in CS115

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 2. Circuit model of the calibration platform in CS115

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 3. Measured and simulated VSWR of FCC-BCICF-1

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 4. Direct output and calibration waveform under reference setup in simulation

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 5. Simulated calibration waveform with different L₀ of pulsed current source

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 6. Simulated calibration waveforms with different L_eq

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 7. Simulated calibration waveforms with different R_eq

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 8. Simulated calibration waveforms with different L_f and C_f

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 9. Regions of current injection probe indicators according to the ferrite-core impedance

Download full size | View in the Article

		rise time/ns	fall time/ns	V_RE/kV	V_FE/kV	F_DR/%
impulse generator output with 50 Ω load		0.7	1.1	1	1	0
L₀=32 nH, R_eq=216 Ω, L_eq=17.5 μH		1.2	1.4	0.59	0.49	17
inductance of the generator	L₀=46 nH	1.3	1.7	0.58	0.49	16
inductance of the generator	L₀=60 nH	1.5	2.1	0.56	0.49	13
R_eq of the injection probe model	R_eq=8 Ω	1.3	1.5	0.13	0.12	8
	R_eq=32 Ω	1.3	1.5	0.34	0.30	12
	R_eq=120 Ω	1.2	1.4	0.54	0.46	15
	R_eq=480 Ω	1.2	1.4	0.64	0.53	17
L_eq of the injection probe model	L_eq=2 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.27	54
	L_eq=5 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.40	32
	L_eq=12.5 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.47	20
	L_eq=30 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.51	14

Table 1. Indicators of calibration waveform with different L₀ , L_eq and R_eq

	C_eq=10 pF		C_eq=20 pF		C_eq=30 pF		C_eq=40 pF		C_eq=50 pF
	t_r/ns	t_p/ns	t_r/ns	t_p/ns	t_r/ns	t_p/ns	t_r/ns	t_p/ns	t_r/ns	t_p/ns
R_eq=8 Ω	1.3	1.4	1.3	1.5	1.3	1.5	1.4	1.6	1.4	1.6
R_eq=32 Ω	1.2	1.4	1.3	1.5	1.4	1.6	1.6	1.8	1.8	2.0
R_eq=120 Ω	1.2	1.4	1.3	1.5	1.6	1.8	1.9	2.2	2.4	2.6
R_eq=216 Ω	1.1	1.3	1.4	1.5	1.7	1.9	2.1	2.3	2.6	2.9
R_eq=400 Ω	1.0	1.3	1.4	1.5	1.7	1.9	2.2	2.4	2.8	3.0

Table 2. The rise time and fall time of calibration waveform with different R_eq and C_eq

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information