Author Affiliations
1School of Printing and Packaging, Wuhan University, Wuhan , Hubei 430079, China2Shenzhen Jinjia Group Co., Ltd., Shenzhen , Guangdong 518105, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Actual spectrum and mixed spectrum of offset printing ink predicted by K-M theoretical model
Fig. 2. Relationship between transmission value and spectral reflectance under different models
Fig. 3. Comparison of K/S data with different concentration for Blue1 primary ink. (a) Real K/S; (b) K/S by piecewise linear interpolation; (c) K/S by traditional normalization method
Fig. 4. Comparison of K/S data with different concentration for 550 nm Magenta ink
Fig. 5. Three gradient spectrum curves of Red2 primary ink. (a) Real spectra; (b) deduced spectra by piecewise linear interpolation; (c) deduced spectra by traditional normalization method
Fig. 6. Determination of m values for 2-, 3- and 4-primary ink blends respectively
Fig. 7. Comparison of predicted spectra by two methods and actual sample spectra. (a) Sample 1; (b) sample 2; (c) sample 3;(d) sample 4; (e) sample 5; (f) sample 6; (g) sample 7; (h) sample 8; (i) sample 9
Primary ink | Sample |
---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
---|
Blue1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 27.03 | - | - | Blue2 | - | - | 57.69 | - | 5.26 | 32.26 | 54.05 | - | - | Yellow | - | - | - | 22.22 | - | - | - | - | 80.64 | Red1 | - | 82.67 | - | - | - | - | - | 9.71 | 9.72 | Black | 9.09 | - | 42.31 | 33.33 | 31.58 | 35.48 | 8.11 | 7.49 | 2.37 | Red2 | 90.91 | 17.33 | - | - | 63.16 | - | - | 76.85 | 7.27 | Red3 | - | - | - | 44.45 | - | 32.26 | 10.81 | 5.95 | - |
|
Table 1. Mass percentage of each base color ink in the target color
Primary ink | RMSE | CGF | RPEARSON |
---|
Proposed | Normalized | Proposed | Normalized | Proposed | Normalized |
---|
Blue1 | 0.0055 | 0.0228 | 0.9999 | 0.9968 | 0.9998 | 0.9976 | Blue2 | 0.0062 | 0.0263 | 0.9998 | 0.9974 | 0.9997 | 0.9983 | Yellow | 0.0046 | 0.0101 | 1.0000 | 0.9999 | 0.9999 | 0.9997 | Red1 | 0.0043 | 0.0152 | 0.9999 | 0.9993 | 0.9998 | 0.9985 | Black | 0.0022 | 0.0254 | 0.9999 | 0.9997 | 0.9872 | 0.9734 | Red2 | 0.0036 | 0.0182 | 1.0000 | 0.9990 | 0.9999 | 0.9986 | Red3 | 0.0050 | 0.0192 | 0.9999 | 0.9988 | 0.9998 | 0.9966 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of actual spectrum of the base ink database and deduced spectra of the methods (K-M and Proposed)
Sample | | | RMSE |
---|
K-M | Proposed | K-M | Proposed | K-M | Proposed |
---|
1 | 16.768 | 0.890 | 9.140 | 0.732 | 0.052 | 0.007 | 2 | 2.143 | 1.707 | 1.836 | 0.860 | 0.023 | 0.007 | 3 | 1.943 | 1.433 | 0.868 | 1.006 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 4 | 4.885 | 2.823 | 4.019 | 2.033 | 0.010 | 0.011 | 5 | 3.808 | 1.612 | 3.095 | 1.228 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 6 | 5.151 | 1.078 | 3.035 | 0.707 | 0.221 | 0.018 | 7 | 5.405 | 5.083 | 2.823 | 4.212 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 8 | 2.203 | 2.570 | 0.944 | 1.687 | 0.032 | 0.012 | 9 | 9.423 | 1.501 | 5.477 | 0.504 | 0.060 | 0.018 | Average | 5.748 | 2.077 | 3.471 | 1.441 | 0.048 | 0.011 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of the accuracy of two ink-based mixed spectrum prediction models