• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 40, Issue 20, 2015001 (2020)
Shangtai Gu1、*, ling Wang1、**, Yanxin Ma2, and Chao Ma1
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Electronic Science, National University of Defense Technology, PLA, Changsha, Hunan 410073, China
  • 2College of Meteorology and Oceanography, National University of Defense Technology, PLA, Changsha, Hunan 410073, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202040.2015001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Shangtai Gu, ling Wang, Yanxin Ma, Chao Ma. Local Feature Description of LiDAR Point Cloud Data Based on Hierarchical Mercator Projection[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 2015001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of hierarchical Mercator projection
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of hierarchical Mercator projection
    Plane of hierarchical Mercator projection (5 layers)
    Fig. 2. Plane of hierarchical Mercator projection (5 layers)
    Flow chart of hierarchical Mercator projection (3 layers)
    Fig. 3. Flow chart of hierarchical Mercator projection (3 layers)
    Influence of the number of Mercator projection layers on the recognition performance of the algorithm (Bologna dataset)
    Fig. 4. Influence of the number of Mercator projection layers on the recognition performance of the algorithm (Bologna dataset)
    Influence of the number of Mercator projection layers on the recognition performance of the algorithm (3DMatch dataset)
    Fig. 5. Influence of the number of Mercator projection layers on the recognition performance of the algorithm (3DMatch dataset)
    PRC of different feature extraction algorithms. (a) Noise variance is 0.3 times point cloud resolution; (b) noise variance is 0.5 times point cloud resolution; (c) noise variance is 0.8 times point cloud resolution; (d) noise variance is 1.5 times point cloud resolution rate
    Fig. 6. PRC of different feature extraction algorithms. (a) Noise variance is 0.3 times point cloud resolution; (b) noise variance is 0.5 times point cloud resolution; (c) noise variance is 0.8 times point cloud resolution; (d) noise variance is 1.5 times point cloud resolution rate
    Number of layersRuntime /sAverage accuracy /%
    11034.83590.0381
    3758.03630.3251
    5690.62500.5222
    10598.67000.7456
    20602.92230.8804
    30835.46650.8767
    501278.12520.7408
    10013052.37270.6823
    Table 1. Runtime and average precision of hierarchical Mercator projection (Bologna dataset)
    Number of layersRuntime /sAverage accuracy /%
    14732.56920.0433
    33069.17230.1214
    51135.24170.3044
    10625.36450.5471
    20858.36940.7182
    3025685.23600.5958
    Table 2. Runtime and average precision of hierarchical Mercator projection (3DMatch dataset)
    AlgorithmRun- time /sAverage accuracy in different noise /%
    0.30.50.81.5
    TriS655.64980.9790.8850.6000.803
    Sgh11100.85730.9860.9740.7770.142
    RoPS1593.71441.0000.9960.9990.994
    SHOT854.80460.9970.9940.9620.006
    MaSH219.63540.9990.8280.1510.027
    SDASS122.61091.0000.9400.1650.035
    Toldi25.05740.9940.9830.3630.803
    LFSH308.22090.8810.5070.1200.029
    DLFS913.49140.8560.6900.5750.077
    HMec-20557.45171.0001.0001.0000.995
    Table 3. Average accuracy and operation time of different feature extraction algorithms
    Shangtai Gu, ling Wang, Yanxin Ma, Chao Ma. Local Feature Description of LiDAR Point Cloud Data Based on Hierarchical Mercator Projection[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(20): 2015001
    Download Citation