Research progress on SPR-based heavy metal ion detection technology

Xiaorui LIU; Ping QIU; Qian LIU; Jiajie CHEN; Xueliang WANG; Xiaoqi DAI; Songfeng HUANG; Yonghong SHAO

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5630.202311170126

Journals >Optical Instruments >Volume 46 >Issue 4 >Page 1 > Article

Optical Instruments
Vol. 46, Issue 4, 1 (2024)

Research progress on SPR-based heavy metal ion detection technology

Xiaorui LIU¹, Ping QIU¹, Qian LIU¹, Jiajie CHEN¹..., Xueliang WANG¹, Xiaoqi DAI¹, Songfeng HUANG¹ and Yonghong SHAO^1,2,*|Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

¹College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

²Shandong Shenda Optical Technology Co., Ltd., Yantai 264000, China

show less

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5630.202311170126 Cite this Article

Xiaorui LIU, Ping QIU, Qian LIU, Jiajie CHEN, Xueliang WANG, Xiaoqi DAI, Songfeng HUANG, Yonghong SHAO. Research progress on SPR-based heavy metal ion detection technology[J]. Optical Instruments, 2024, 46(4): 1 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Kretschmann coupling structure

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 2. Three coupling structures

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 3. SPR experiment configuration structure

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 4. SPR spectroscopy based on the Kretschmann configuration

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 5. SPR spectral system

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 6. Four-layer Kretschmann structure

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 7. Comparison of MoS₂-based SPR sensor and traditional techniques in Hg²⁺ detection

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of sensing principle

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 9. Dual-channel fiber-optic sensor

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 10. Principle of LSPR photonic chemical sensor

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 11. Summary of SPR ion detection methods

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 12. Microfluidic channel λ_SPR images of spike protein solution

Download full size | View in the Article

离子	检测限	灵敏度	动态范围（线性响应范围）	备注	活性层/识别元素
Hg²⁺	10⁻⁶ mol/L		0～25 µmol/L		柠檬酸盐包覆的金纳米颗粒PVA复合材料^[24]
Hg²⁺		0.29^◦/（mg·L⁻¹）	0.1～5 mg/L	SNR 1.53	Au/Ag/Au/壳聚糖–氧化石墨烯传感器^[18]
Hg²⁺	26 pmol/L（0.005 µg/L）		0.05～100 nmol/L	回归系数：0.99	牛血清白蛋白和汞特异性适配体^[37]
Hg²⁺	1 pmol/L	190^◦/RIU	10⁻¹⁰～10⁻⁸ mol/L	SNR：3	超结构二硫化钼纳米片作为传感层^[23]
Hg²⁺	8 nmol/L		8～100 nmol/L	回归系数：0.98SNR：3	4–巯基吡啶（4-mercaptopyridine, 4MPY）功能化金纳米颗粒（Au NPs/4-MPY）作为信号放大标签^[26]
Hg²⁺		0.558 6 nm/（mg·L⁻¹）	0～30 µmol/L		壳聚糖（CS）/聚丙烯酸（PAA）多层敏感膜^[27]
Hg²⁺		0.006 57°/（mg·L⁻¹）	低于10 mg/L		石墨烯氧化物/聚酰胺胺（GO/PAMAM）树枝状共聚物复合薄膜^[16]
Hg²⁺	3.073 pmol/L		10⁻¹¹～10⁻³ mol/L		倾斜光纤布拉格光栅（TFBG）等离子传感器^[32]
Hg²⁺	0.01 mg/L				壳聚糖/磁赤铁矿（Cs/Fe₂O₃）复合薄膜^[19]
Cu²⁺	0.24 µg/L		0.5～35 µg/L		银纳米颗粒^[33]
Cu²⁺		3.271°/（mg·L⁻¹）	0.01～0.5 mg/L		十六烷基三甲基溴化铵和氧化石墨烯复合改性的纳米晶纤维素（CTA-NCC/GO）薄膜^[15]
Cu²⁺	0.105 4 µmol/L	0.0117 nm/（µmg·L⁻¹）	0.2～50 µmol/L和50～500 µmol/L		壳聚糖（CS）/聚丙烯酸（PAA）双层^[28]
Cu²⁺		0.249 nm/（µ mg·L⁻¹）			壳聚糖（CS）和聚丙烯酸（PAA）对具有较厚Ag的通道进行叠层（LBL）功能化^[30]
Cu²⁺	18 ug/L	0.7271/（ mg·L⁻¹）	1～5 mg/L		银/金/改性壳聚糖（MCS）复合膜^[20]
Cu²⁺Pb²⁺	4.06×10⁻¹² g/L8.18×10⁻¹⁰ g/L	4.07×10⁵ nm/（mg·L⁻¹）	0～1 000 µg/L0～1 000 mg/L		铜层和银层分别涂有铅离子和铜离子印迹纳米粒子层^[25]
Pb²⁺		0.20^◦/（mg·L⁻¹）	0.1～5 mg/L	SNR 1.53	Au/Ag/Au/壳聚糖–氧化石墨烯传感器^[18]
Pb²⁺	10⁻¹⁰ mol/L		10⁻¹⁰～10⁻⁵ mol/L	线性相关系数98%	电化学表面等离子体共振（EC-SPR）光纤传感器^[29]
Pb²⁺		2.05^◦/（mg·L⁻¹）	0.1～5 mg/L	回归系数98%	壳聚糖–氧化石墨烯（CS-GO）SPR传感器中实现金–银–金纳米结构^[17]
Pb²⁺	0.011 µg/L		0.011 μg/L～5 000 mg/L		聚间苯二胺–共苯胺-2-磺酸（poly（mPD-co-ASA））共聚物纳米粒子功能化的自组装金纳米岛（SAMAuNIs）为特异性受体^[35]
Pb²⁺		0.452^◦/RIU			纳米复合膜^[13]
Pb²⁺	0.3 μg/L				还原石墨烯氧化物/赤铁矿（rGO/Fe₂O₃）^[14]
Pb²⁺	100 μg/L		100 μg/L～2 mg/L	线性回归系数0.96	单分散的二氧化硅金核壳纳米结构（SiO₂@Au NSs）^[36]
Pb²⁺	0.001 mg/L	1.2 nm/（µg·L⁻¹）			磁赤铁矿/还原氧化石墨烯（γ-Fe₂O₃/rGO）纳米复合材料^[31]
Ca²⁺		355.525^◦/RIU			二维蓝色磷烯/二硫化钼（即BlueP/MoS₂）异质结构作为与分析物相互作用的层^[22]
Fe³⁺	0.5 mg/L	0.113 96^◦/（mg·L⁻¹）	0～1 mg/L，1～10 mg/L		壳聚糖/羟基功能化石墨烯量子点（Cs/HGQDs）薄膜^[21]
As³⁺	0.01 µg/L		0.025～0.75 µg/L	线性相关系数0.991 5	特异性核酸适体（aptamers，Apt）反应与纳米催化放大信号相结合^[38]

Table 1. Comparison of detection limit, sensitivity, and other metrics for SPR-based heavy ion detection methods

SPR传感技术	系统复杂程度	成像速度	灵敏度/RIU	动态范围/RIU
强度调制 SPR	简单	Video rate	2.24 × 10⁻⁶	0.003 7
波长调制 SPR	复杂	0.2 s^[40]	1.17 × 10⁻⁶	0.037
相位调制 SPR	中等	1 s^[48]	9.79 × 10⁻⁷	0.003 7
角度调制 SPR	中等	0.5 s^[49]	1.52 × 10⁻⁶	0.046

Table 2. SPR imaging sensing technology including its detection speed and other metrics

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information

微信扫一扫：分享

微信扫一扫：分享