• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 44, Issue 6, 0601012 (2024)
Yinying Li1, Xiangcheng Chen1, Cuirong Yu2, Guangyao Dai1, and Songhua Wu1、3、4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Marine Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong , China
  • 2Qingdao Leice Transient Technology Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266101, Shandong , China
  • 3Laoshan Laboratory, Qingdao 266237, Shandong , China
  • 4Institute for Advanced Ocean Study, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS230805 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yinying Li, Xiangcheng Chen, Cuirong Yu, Guangyao Dai, Songhua Wu. Simulation and Error Analysis of Coherent Differential Absorption Carbon Dioxide Lidar[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(6): 0601012 Copy Citation Text show less
    Structural design drawing of CDIAL system
    Fig. 1. Structural design drawing of CDIAL system
    Flow chart of simulation of echo signal by CDIAL
    Fig. 2. Flow chart of simulation of echo signal by CDIAL
    Simulation results of echo signal. (a) Aerosol backscattering coefficient; (b) standard atmospheric model; (c) CO2 volume fraction profile; (d) simulated echo signal
    Fig. 3. Simulation results of echo signal. (a) Aerosol backscattering coefficient; (b) standard atmospheric model; (c) CO2 volume fraction profile; (d) simulated echo signal
    Variation of DAOD with drift of λon at different heights
    Fig. 4. Variation of DAOD with drift of λon at different heights
    Variation of CO2 molecular absorption cross section with wavelength
    Fig. 5. Variation of CO2 molecular absorption cross section with wavelength
    RSE introduced by wavelength shift in DAOD at different altitudes
    Fig. 6. RSE introduced by wavelength shift in DAOD at different altitudes
    Variation of DAOD with increasing temperature offset at different heights
    Fig. 7. Variation of DAOD with increasing temperature offset at different heights
    CO2 molecular absorption cross section difference
    Fig. 8. CO2 molecular absorption cross section difference
    RSE of DAOD at different altitudes induced by temperature bias
    Fig. 9. RSE of DAOD at different altitudes induced by temperature bias
    Variation of DAOD with increasing pressure offset at different heights
    Fig. 10. Variation of DAOD with increasing pressure offset at different heights
    RSE of DAOD at different altitudes induced by pressure bias
    Fig. 11. RSE of DAOD at different altitudes induced by pressure bias
    SNR of echo output varies with height under different aerosol conditions
    Fig. 12. SNR of echo output varies with height under different aerosol conditions
    Random error of CO2 volume fraction varies with height under different aerosol conditions
    Fig. 13. Random error of CO2 volume fraction varies with height under different aerosol conditions
    RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by wavelength drift
    Fig. 14. RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by wavelength drift
    RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by temperature uncertainty
    Fig. 15. RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by temperature uncertainty
    RSE of CO2 molecular number density caused by temperature uncertainty
    Fig. 16. RSE of CO2 molecular number density caused by temperature uncertainty
    RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by pressure uncertainty
    Fig. 17. RSE of volume fraction inversion caused by pressure uncertainty
    RSE of CO2 molecular number density caused by pressure uncertainty
    Fig. 18. RSE of CO2 molecular number density caused by pressure uncertainty
    RSE of CO2 volume fraction caused by measurement deviation of water vapor volume mixing ratio
    Fig. 19. RSE of CO2 volume fraction caused by measurement deviation of water vapor volume mixing ratio
    SystemItemContent
    Transmission systemLaserMOPA fiber laser
    Laser wavelength(on)/nm1572.335
    Laser wavelength(off)/nm1572.180
    Pulse energy /μJ80
    Laser linewidth /kHz<5
    Repetition frequency /kHz10
    Intermediate frequency /MHz80
    Pulse width /ns400
    Telescope diameter /mm80
    Acquisition systemDetectorBalance detector
    Responsivity /(A·W-11
    ADC sampling /(Gbit/s)1
    Bandwidth /MHz200
    Table 1. Parameters of CDIAL system
    Simulation parameterValueSimulation parameterValue
    Laser wavelength(on/off)/nm1572.335/1572.180Input impedance /Ω50
    Pulse energy /μJ80Gain1000
    Quantum efficiency0.80Number of range gates512
    Telescope diameter /mm80Local oscillator truncation efficiency /mW2
    Instrumental constant0.6026Heterodyne efficiency /%46.1
    Table 2. Simulation parameters of echo signal
    ParameterValueParameterValue
    Bandwidth /MHz200Responsivity /(A·W-11 @1550 nm
    Output impedance /Ω50Maximum output /V1.5 @50 Ω
    Detector diameter /μm75
    Table 3. Parameters of balance detector system
    Error sourceUncertainty

    Relative system

    error /%

    Absolute

    error /10-6

    Total0.451.80
    Wavelength0.5 pm0.010.04
    Temperature1 K0.411.64
    Pressure1 hPa0.110.44
    Water vapor10%0.160.64
    Table 4. Total error of system
    Yinying Li, Xiangcheng Chen, Cuirong Yu, Guangyao Dai, Songhua Wu. Simulation and Error Analysis of Coherent Differential Absorption Carbon Dioxide Lidar[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(6): 0601012
    Download Citation