Objective Quality Assessment for Three-Dimensional Meshes

Yaoyao Lin; Mei Yu; Zhouyan He; Gangyi Jiang

doi:10.3788/LOP202158.0200003

Journals >Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >Volume 58 >Issue 2 >Page 0200003 > Article

Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 58, Issue 2, 0200003 (2021)

Objective Quality Assessment for Three-Dimensional Meshes

Yaoyao Lin¹, Mei Yu^1、2、*, Zhouyan He¹, and Gangyi Jiang^1、2

Author Affiliations

¹Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China

²State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China

show less

DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0200003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts

Yaoyao Lin, Mei Yu, Zhouyan He, Gangyi Jiang. Objective Quality Assessment for Three-Dimensional Meshes[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0200003 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. Original 3D meshes of LIRIS/EPFL general-purpose. (a) Armadillo;(b) Venus;(c) Dinosaur;(d) Rockerarm

Download full size

Fig. 2. Original 3D meshes of LIRIS_Mask. (a) Armadillo;(b) Dinosaur;(c) Lion Head;(d) Bimba

Download full size

Type	Principle	Method
FR	Geometric distance	HD^[20], RMS^[21]
	Geometric Laplacian	GL1^[22], GL2^[23]
	Network structure	MSDM^[14]
	Multi-scale/structure	MSDM2^[24]
	Dihedral angle	DAME^[25]
	Curvature	TPDM^[26], Dong^[27]

Table 1. FR 3D mesh objective quality assessment method

Type	Principle	Method
RR	Global roughness	3DWPM1^[28], 3DWPM2^[29]
	Local roughness	FMPD^[30]
	Statistical distribution/Dihedral angle	KLD Gamma^[31]KLD Weibull^[31]

Table 2. RR 3D mesh objective quality assessment method

Type	Principle	Method
NR	Statistical distribution/Dihedral angle	NR-SVR^[32]
	Mean curvature/Dihedral angle	NR-SVR^[33]
	Dihedral angle	NR-SVR^[11]
	Shape index/Curvedness/Vertex scatter/Area	NR-SVR^[34]
	Graph spectral features/Spatial features	BMQA-GSES^[35]

Table 3. NR 3D mesh objective quality assessment method

Type	Method	PLCC /%	SROCC /%
FR	HD^[20]	11.4	13.8
	RMS^[21]	28.1	26.8
	GL1^[22]	35.5	33.1
	GL2^[23]	42.4	39.3
	MSDM^[14]	75.0	73.9
	MSDM2^[24]	81.4	80.4
	DAME^[25]	75.2	76.6
	TPDM^[26]	84.1	80.4
	Dong^[27]	87.7	86.6
RR	3DWPM1^[28]	61.8	69.3
	3DWPM2^[29]	49.6	49.0
	FMPD^[30]	83.5	81.9
	KLD Gamma^[31]	74.0	71.6
	KLD Weibull^[31]	74.1	71.7
NR	NR-SVR^[32]	87.8	81.5
	NR-SVR^[33]	82.7	83.6
	NR-SVR^[11]	86.8	84.6
	NR-SVR^[34]	87.8	81.9
	BMQA-GSES^[35]	90.5	87.9

Table 4. Performance comparison of different methods on LIRIS/EPFL general-purpose database

Type	Method	PLCC /%	SROCC /%
FR	HD^[20]	20.2	26.6
	RMS^[21]	41.2	48.8
	GL1^[22]	39.6	42.0
	GL2^[23]	38.3	40.1
	MSDM^[14]	69.2	65.2
	MSDM2^[24]	87.3	89.6
	DAME^[25]	58.6	68.1
	TPDM^[26]	88.6	90.0
	Dong^[27]	92.6	92.5
RR	3DWPM1^[28]	31.9	29.4
	3DWPM2^[29]	42.7	37.4
	FMPD^[30]	80.8	80.2
	KLD Gamma^[31]	64.0	74.3
	KLD Weibull^[31]	74.6	66.6
NR	NR-SVR^[32]	91.2	90.4
	NR-SVR^[33]	85.4	88.2
	NR-SVR^[11]	89.1	91.1
	NR-SVR^[34]	90.1	60.0

Table 5. Performance comparison of different methods on LIRIS_Mask database

Yaoyao Lin, Mei Yu, Zhouyan He, Gangyi Jiang. Objective Quality Assessment for Three-Dimensional Meshes[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0200003

Download Citation

Set citation alerts for the article

Tools

Set citation alerts for the article

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information