Author Affiliations
1School of Missile Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi’an 710025, China2School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China3School of Science, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Test and thermal map processing flow chart
Fig. 2. Testing specimen
Fig. 3. Dynamic curve of impact response parameters with time
Fig. 4. Test results of 1#-4# specimen by ultrasonic C-scan
Fig. 5. Infrared thermal wave detection schematic diagram
Fig. 6. Active infrared thermal wave detection system
Fig. 7. Test results of 1# specimen (TS-15J) by pulse thermography
Fig. 8. Test results of 3# specimen (TP-15J) by pulse thermography
Fig. 9. Test results of 2# specimen (TS-30J) by pulse thermography
Fig. 10. Test results of 4# specimen (TP-30J) by pulse thermography
Fig. 11. Temperature change of 1# specimen after pulse excitation
Fig. 12. Test results of 1# specimen (TS-15J) by ultrasonic thermalgraphy
Fig. 13. Test results of 3# specimen (TP-15J) by ultrasonic thermalgraphy
Fig. 14. Test results of 2# specimen (TS-30J) by ultrasonic thermalgraphy
Fig. 15. Test results of 4# specimen (TP-30J) by ultrasonic thermalgraphy
Fig. 16. Time sequence change characteristics of 1#-4# specimen
Fig. 17. Schematic diagram of region growing algorithm
Fig. 18. Extraction and segmentation results of heat image damage by pulse infrared detection
Fig. 19. Extraction and segmentation results of heat image damage by pulse uitrasonic infrared detection
Sample number | Damage area/mm2 | | Relative error | Pulse | Ultrasonic | C-scanning | Pulse | Ultrasonic | 1# | 875.29 | 1048.16 | 1077.72 | | 18.7% | 2.74% | 2# | 1068.70 | 1476.83 | 1523.96 | 29.8% | 3.09% | 3# | 63.75 | 791.69 | 831.56 | 92.3% | 4.79% | 4# | 209.65 | 1084.70 | 1281.74 | 83.6% | 15.3% |
|
Table 1. The delamination damage area and its relative error of TP/TS specimens under pulse/ultrasonic detection method