• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 18, Issue 6, 062201 (2020)
Hongbo Shang1、2, Luwei Zhang1、2、3、*, Chunlai Liu1, Ping Wang1, Yongxin Sui1、2, and Huaijiang Yang1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202018.062201 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hongbo Shang, Luwei Zhang, Chunlai Liu, Ping Wang, Yongxin Sui, Huaijiang Yang. Optimization based on sensitivity for material birefringence in projection lens[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(6): 062201 Copy Citation Text show less
    Distribution of the first ±9 OZP terms.
    Fig. 1. Distribution of the first ±9 OZP terms.
    Layout of the NA 0.93 optical system.
    Fig. 2. Layout of the NA 0.93 optical system.
    Birefringence map. (a) Element 1, RMS value is 0.54 nm/cm and PV value is 1.16 nm/cm; (b) element 11, RMS value is 0.52 nm/cm and PV value is 1.26 nm/cm; (c) element 17, RMS value is 0.61 nm/cm and PV value is 1.49 nm/cm.
    Fig. 3. Birefringence map. (a) Element 1, RMS value is 0.54 nm/cm and PV value is 1.16 nm/cm; (b) element 11, RMS value is 0.52 nm/cm and PV value is 1.26 nm/cm; (c) element 17, RMS value is 0.61 nm/cm and PV value is 1.49 nm/cm.
    OZP coefficients of elements 1, 11, and 17.
    Fig. 4. OZP coefficients of elements 1, 11, and 17.
    Retardation pupil before optimization. (a) Field 1, RMS value is 7.80 nm; (b) field 2, RMS value is 7.07 nm; (c) field 3, RMS value is 6.29 nm.
    Fig. 5. Retardation pupil before optimization. (a) Field 1, RMS value is 7.80 nm; (b) field 2, RMS value is 7.07 nm; (c) field 3, RMS value is 6.29 nm.
    OZP coefficients of the retardation pupil before optimization.
    Fig. 6. OZP coefficients of the retardation pupil before optimization.
    Retardation pupil after optimization. (a) Field 1, RMS value is 2.25 nm; (b) field 2, RMS value is 2.45 nm; (c) field 3, RMS value is 2.77 nm.
    Fig. 7. Retardation pupil after optimization. (a) Field 1, RMS value is 2.25 nm; (b) field 2, RMS value is 2.45 nm; (c) field 3, RMS value is 2.77 nm.
    OZP coefficients of the retardation pupil after optimization.
    Fig. 8. OZP coefficients of the retardation pupil after optimization.
    Comparison of convergence between the PSO and NLS methods.
    Fig. 9. Comparison of convergence between the PSO and NLS methods.
    jOZjjOZj
    1(1001)43(2ρ21)(1001)
    1(0110)43(2ρ21)(0110)
    22ρ(cosθsinθsinθcosθ)56ρ2(cos2θsin2θsin2θcos2θ)
    22ρ(cosθsinθsinθcosθ)56ρ2(cos2θsin2θsin2θcos2θ)
    32ρ(sinθcosθcosθsinθ)66ρ2(sin2θcos2θcos2θsin2θ)
    32ρ(sinθcosθcosθsinθ)66ρ2(sin2θcos2θcos2θsin2θ)
    Table 1. First ±6 Terms of OZP
    ParameterSpecification
    Central wavelength193.368 nm
    NA0.93
    Magnification0.25
    Object height56 mm
    Resolution65 nm
    Element number22
    Table 2. Projection Lens Parameters
    Element numberRotation angle (°)Element numberRotation angle (°)
    1−122.487712−28.1719
    2151.930113−130.8673
    3−18.55761498.6486
    4−58.056415163.6454
    5−166.28421681.236
    618.62961753.6626
    7−40.816618−41.0608
    822.018119139.3792
    9−26.450420−102.1568
    10−8.562421161.3852
    11163.331522135.8173
    Table 3. Rotation Angles for Each Lens Element After Optimization
    Hongbo Shang, Luwei Zhang, Chunlai Liu, Ping Wang, Yongxin Sui, Huaijiang Yang. Optimization based on sensitivity for material birefringence in projection lens[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2020, 18(6): 062201
    Download Citation