• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 24, 2428006 (2022)
Bingzhi Shen, Ruomei Nie, Haipeng Jiang, Zhishuai Yang, Mingrui Song, Siqi Chen, and Xinwei Li*
Author Affiliations
  • College of Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.2428006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Bingzhi Shen, Ruomei Nie, Haipeng Jiang, Zhishuai Yang, Mingrui Song, Siqi Chen, Xinwei Li. High-Resolution Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Hybrid Convolutional Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(24): 2428006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of lightweight multi-scale pyramid hybrid pooling hybrid convolution network
    Fig. 1. Schematic of lightweight multi-scale pyramid hybrid pooling hybrid convolution network
    Classification results of different classification methods on WHU-Hi-LongKou dataset
    Fig. 2. Classification results of different classification methods on WHU-Hi-LongKou dataset
    Classification results of different classification methods on WHU-Hi-HanChuan dataset
    Fig. 3. Classification results of different classification methods on WHU-Hi-HanChuan dataset
    Classification results of different classification methods on WHU-Hi-HongHu dataset
    Fig. 4. Classification results of different classification methods on WHU-Hi-HongHu dataset
    No.Class nameNumber of training samplesNumber of test samplesNo.Class nameNumber of training samplesNumber of test samples
    C1Corn34534166C6Rice11911735
    C2Cotton848290C7Water67066386
    C3Sesame303001C8Roads and houses717053
    C4Broad-leaf soybean63262580C9Mixed weed525177
    C5Narrow-leaf soybean424109
    Table 1. Class information of the WHU-Hi-LongKou dataset
    No.Class nameNumber of training samplesNumber of test samplesNo.Class nameNumber of training samplesNumber of test samples
    C1Strawberry89543840C9Grass1899280
    C2Cowpea45522298C10Red roof21010306
    C3Soybean20610081C11Gray roof33816593
    C4Sorghum1075246C12Plastic743605
    C5Water spinach241176C13Bare soil1828934
    C6Watermelon914442C14Road37118189
    C7Greens1185785C15Bright object231113
    C8Trees35917619C16Water150873893
    Table 2. Class information of the WHU-Hi-HanChuan dataset
    No.Class nameNumber of training samplesNumber of test samplesNo.Class nameNumber of training samplesNumber of test samples
    C1Red roof28113760C12Brassica chinensis1798775
    C2Road703442C13Small Brassica chinensis45022057
    C3Bare soil43721384C14Lactuca sativa1477209
    C4Cotton3265160020C15Celtuce20982
    C5Cotton firewood1246094C16Film covered lettuce1457117
    C6Rape89143666C17Romaine lettuce602950
    C7Chinese cabbage48223621C18Carrot643153
    C8Pakchoi813973C19White radish1748538
    C9Cabbage21710602C20Garlic sprout703416
    C10Tuber mustard24812146C21Broad bean271301
    C11Brassica parachinensis22010795C22Tree813959
    Table 3. Class information of the WHU-Hi-HongHu dataset
    ParameterRes-2D-CNN3D-CNNHybridSNLHHN
    Number of parameters47911412993061715078114438
    Table 4. Number of parameters of different models
    No.ClassAccuracy /%
    Res-2D-CNN3D-CNNHybridSNLHHN
    C1Corn64.8871.9299.7999.72
    C2Cotton47.5050.1495.5598.41
    C3Sesame54.98096.0799.49
    C4Broad-leaf soybean86.0388.9499.4299.59
    C5Narrow-leaf soybeans25.2133.3391.5898.38
    C6Rice72.0743.9199.5799.84
    C7Water99.9399.5999.9199.90
    C8Roads and houses86.3572.4295.0492.53
    C9Mixed weed50.7485.5396.0196.55
    Training time /s171.49837.9955.1729.37
    Predicting time /s247.11736.4022.2725.10
    OA /%84.9679.1399.0399.12
    Kappa /%80.0073.0098.7299.33
    AA /%55.7645.2696.0397.76
    Table 5. Classification accuracy of different methods on WHU-Hi-LongKou dataset(1% samples)
    No.ClassAccuracy /%
    Res-2D-CNN3D-CNNHybridSNLHHN
    C1Strawberry89.2194.5996.8498.02
    C2Cowpea66.0190.0598.4198.72
    C3Soybean58.1960.9597.6997.27
    C4Sorghum56.8672.5699.6498.94
    C5Water spinach24.4983.7588.9897.78
    C6Watermelon22.2961.1594.1994.01
    C7Greens71.5195.0792.6694.03
    C8Trees74.7975.5696.2498.44
    C9Grass58.7671.5995.7598.04
    C10Red roof94.1697.5898.5198.89
    C11Gray roof89.4892.6296.4998.26
    C12Plastic30.8864.5496.2295.48
    C13Bare soil63.0969.9294.7095.51
    C14Road82.4182.6997.0098.27
    C15Bright object69.3361.5397.3395.83
    C16Water99.3197.6199.9599.92
    Training time /s441.682124.8358.8364.77
    Predicting time /s405.131298.8733.8635.45
    OA /%82.1680.0697.6998.43
    Kappa /%79.0776.8797.3098.16
    AA /%60.2065.9594.3596.40
    Table 6. Classification accuracy of different methods on WHU-Hi-HanChuan dataset(2% samples)
    No.ClassAccuracy /%
    Res-2D-CNN3D-CNNHybridSNLHHN
    C1Red roof95.5595.3897.9998.64
    C2Road73.5279.9890.3992.61
    C3Bare soil86.6888.4396.7399.1
    C4Cotton97.8699.0099.5799.74
    C5Cotton firewood79.0082.6195.3897.94
    C6Rape92.3288.7199.0299.57
    C7Chinese cabbage75.4184.4795.3897.11
    C8Pakchoi41.8565.7694.4795.94
    C9Cabbage98.0797.5196.5899.61
    C10Tuber mustard66.3680.9296.9797.89
    C11Brassica parachinensis74.9876.5296.4997.19
    C12Brassica chinensis62.0371.2793.4197.17
    C13Small Brassica chinensis65.3975.4196.7797.30
    C14Lactuca sativa81.8888.4097.5699.44
    C15Celtuce61.5798.5497.5765.91
    C16Film covered lettuce88.4887.4588.8698.59
    C17Romaine lettuce63.7788.3680.9598.53
    C18Carrot60.8564.0193.2796.09
    C19White radish82.3173.0496.4998.61
    C20Garlic sprout80.3761.3096.8196.62
    C21Broad bean2.7819.5493.1297.06
    C22Tree69.7466.9096.1296.12
    Training time /s674.383243.99122.16101.07
    Predicting time /s473.051519.5655.5461.31
    OA /%87.7484.8097.7098.84
    Kappa /%84.4780.9397.0998.53
    AA /%66.5366.1993.2597.35
    Table 7. Classification accuracy of different methods on WHU-Hi-HongHu dataset(2% samples)
    Bingzhi Shen, Ruomei Nie, Haipeng Jiang, Zhishuai Yang, Mingrui Song, Siqi Chen, Xinwei Li. High-Resolution Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Hybrid Convolutional Network[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(24): 2428006
    Download Citation