• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 12, 1212007 (2019)
Yurong Zhang, Ying Chang, and Wanrong Gao*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronic Engineering and Optoelectronic Technique, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.1212007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yurong Zhang, Ying Chang, Wanrong Gao. Effect of Light Polarization State on Phase Delay Measurement Induced by Tissue Birefringence in Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging System[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1212007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of PS-OCT system
    Fig. 1. Schematic of PS-OCT system
    Diagram of relationship among Δ,b, and x'
    Fig. 2. Diagram of relationship among Δ,b, and x'
    Relationship among error, incident azimuth angle, and phase retardation of sample when θ1=0°. (a) Relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is linear polarization; (b) relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is elliptical polarization; (c) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polarization is linear polarization; (d) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polariz
    Fig. 3. Relationship among error, incident azimuth angle, and phase retardation of sample when θ1=0°. (a) Relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is linear polarization; (b) relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is elliptical polarization; (c) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polarization is linear polarization; (d) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polariz
    Relationship among error, incident azimuth angle, and phase retardation of sample when θ1=45°. (a) Relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is linear polarization; (b) relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is elliptical polarization; (c) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polarization is linear polarization; (d) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polari
    Fig. 4. Relationship among error, incident azimuth angle, and phase retardation of sample when θ1=45°. (a) Relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is linear polarization; (b) relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is elliptical polarization; (c) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polarization is linear polarization; (d) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polari
    Relationship among error, incident azimuth angle, and phase retardation of sample when θ1=60°. (a) Relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is linear polarization; (b) relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is elliptical polarization; (c) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polarization is linear polarization; (d) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polari
    Fig. 5. Relationship among error, incident azimuth angle, and phase retardation of sample when θ1=60°. (a) Relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is linear polarization; (b) relationship between error and incident azimuth when incident polarization is elliptical polarization; (c) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polarization is linear polarization; (d) relationship between error and phase retardation when incident polari
    Schematic of PS-OCT imaging system
    Fig. 6. Schematic of PS-OCT imaging system
    Diagrams of intensity and phase retardation with 90° and 135° linearly polarized incident light. (a) Intensity with 90° linearly polarized incident light; (b) phase retardation with 90° linearly polarized incident light; (c) intensity with 135° linearly polarized incident light; (d) phase retardation with 135° linearly polarized incident light
    Fig. 7. Diagrams of intensity and phase retardation with 90° and 135° linearly polarized incident light. (a) Intensity with 90° linearly polarized incident light; (b) phase retardation with 90° linearly polarized incident light; (c) intensity with 135° linearly polarized incident light; (d) phase retardation with 135° linearly polarized incident light
    Diagrams of intensity and phase retardation with circularly and elliptically polarized incident light. (a) Intensity with circularly polarized incident light; (b) phase retardation with circularly polarized incident light; (c) intensity with 60° elliptically polarized incident light; (d) phase retardation with 60° elliptically polarized incident light
    Fig. 8. Diagrams of intensity and phase retardation with circularly and elliptically polarized incident light. (a) Intensity with circularly polarized incident light; (b) phase retardation with circularly polarized incident light; (c) intensity with 60° elliptically polarized incident light; (d) phase retardation with 60° elliptically polarized incident light
    Yurong Zhang, Ying Chang, Wanrong Gao. Effect of Light Polarization State on Phase Delay Measurement Induced by Tissue Birefringence in Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging System[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1212007
    Download Citation