1. SEM images of mesoporous carbon obtained at template/pitch mass ratios of (a, b) 0.6, (c, d) 0.8, (e, f) 1.0, and (g, h) 1.2
2. TEM images of mesoporous carbon along (a-d) [100] and (e-h) [001] orientations obtained at template/pitch mass ratios of (a, e) 0.6, (b, f) 0.8, (c, g) 1.0 and (d, h) 1.2
3. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) BJH pore size distributions of mesoporous carbon obtained from various addition amounts of SBA-15
4. Small-angle XRD patterns of mesoporous carbon obtained from various addition amounts of SBA-15
5. (a, b) SEM and (c, d) TEM images of POMC1.0-800-F
6. Small-angle XRD patterns of mesoporous carbon prepared under different heating rates
7. SEM images of mesoporous carbon obtained under carbonization temperatures of (a, b) 700, (c, d) 800, (e, f) 900 and (g, h) 1000 ℃
8. TEM images of mesoporous carbon obtained under carbonization temperatures of (a, e) 700, (b, f) 800, (c, g) 900 and (d, h) 1000 ℃
9. (a) TG and DTG curves, (b) cycling performance at 0.2C rate, (c) EIS spectra and (d) rate performance of sample POMCt/60S, (e) CV curves and (f) long cycling performance at 0.2C rate of sample POMC900/60S
S1. Apparent viscosity vs. temperature correlation curves of methylnaphthalene pitch T290
S2. Synthesis of methylnaphthalene pitch
S3. XRD patterns of mesoporous carbon prepared under various carbonization temperatures in the (a) low-angle and (b) wide-angle regions
S4. Solid-state 13C-NMR spectra of methylnaphthalene pitch T290
S5. FT-IR spectra of T290 and derived carbon prepared under various carbonization temperatures
S6. UV-Vis absorption spectra of the Li2S6 solution before and after adding POMC prepared under various carbonization temperatures (inset: digital image of pure Li2S6 solution and Li2S6 solutions after adding POMC for 2 h)
Elemental analysis/wt% | SPa/℃
| CYb/wt%
| Solubility/wt% |
---|
C | H | Br(diff.) | H/C | TS | TI-THFS | THFI-QS | QI |
---|
93.65 | 4.63 | 1.72 | 0.59 | 278 | 56.3 | 89.8 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 0 |
|
Table 1. General physical properties of methylnaphthalene pitch T290
Sample | SBET/(m2·g-1)
| Vtotal/(cm3·g-1)
| Davea/nm
| d100b/nm
| a0c/nm
| Wall thicknessd/nm
|
---|
SBA-15e | 488 | 1.24 | 8.31 | 10.23 | 11.81 | 3.50 | POMC0.6-800 | 654 | 0.94 | 3.84 | 9.71 | 11.21 | 7.37 | POMC0.8-800 | 653 | 0.94 | 3.85 | 9.71 | 11.21 | 7.36 | POMC1.0-800 | 703 | 1.05 | 4.11 | 9.48 | 10.95 | 6.84 | POMC1.2-800 | 684 | 0.98 | 4.10 | 8.73 | 10.08 | 5.98 | POMC1.0-800-F | 681 | 0.93 | 3.85 | 8.72 | 10.07 | 6.22 | POMC1.0-700 | 749 | 1.16 | 4.12 | 9.46 | 10.92 | 6.80 | POMC1.0-900 | 675 | 1.00 | 3.84 | 9.28 | 10.72 | 6.88 | POMC1.0-1000 | 676 | 0.95 | 3.85 | 8.71 | 10.06 | 6.21 |
|
Table 1. Porous structural parameters of mesoporous carbon obtained under different process conditions
Pitch | Aliphatic carbons/% | Aromatic carbons/% | fa |
---|
CH3a | CH2b | Cchainc | Car1d | Car2e |
---|
T290 | 2.31 | 3.09 | 7.83 | 59.49 | 27.28 | 0.87 |
|
Table 2. Distributions of aliphatic and aromatic carbons in methylnaphthalene pitch T290
Carbon-based sulfur host | Precursor | Sulfur content
/wt%
| Initial capacity
/(mAh·g-1)
| Retention | Rate performance
/(mAh·g-1)
| Ref. |
---|
Hierarchical structure ordered mesoporous carbon | Phenolic resin | 60 | 1138 at 0.1C | ~70% after 80 cycles | 761 at 2.7C | [30] | Core-shell structure ordered meso@microporous carbon | Sucrose | 60 | 1037 at 0.5C | ~81% after 200 cycles | 605 at 2C | [31] | Hierarchical microporous-mesoporous carbon | Phenolic resin | 60 | 939 at 0.3C | ~78% after 150 cycles | 561 at 2C | [33] | Mesoporous hollow carbon | Petroleum pitch | 70 | 1071 at 0.5C | ~91% after 100 cycles | 450 at 3C | [34] | Ordered mesoporous carbon | Methylnaphthalene pitch | 60 | 1095 at 0.2C | ~78% after 100 cycles | 651 at 2C,
556 at 3C | This
work
|
|
Table 3. Comparison of electrochemical performance of POMC with similar carbon hosts for Li-S batteries