• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 5, Issue 2, 97 (2017)
Chunsheng Li1, Xinyou Qiu1, and Xun Li2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
  • 2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K2, Canada
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000097 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Chunsheng Li, Xinyou Qiu, Xun Li. Hybrid optical wavelength demultiplexer and power combiner for TWDM PON[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(2): 97 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram for illustration of the proposed structure: while the downstream signal (from F to F′) passes through a conventional AWG, the upstream signal (from F′ to A) sees an optical power (beam) combiner.
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram for illustration of the proposed structure: while the downstream signal (from F to F) passes through a conventional AWG, the upstream signal (from F to A) sees an optical power (beam) combiner.
    (a) Schematic (top) view of the hybrid optical wavelength demultiplexer and power combiner; inset 1, cross-sectional view of the Si photonic wire; inset 2, a schematic (top) view of the equivalent AWs and the modifications. (b) Illustration of the proposed structure (excluding the structure for combing the separated input ports into one): while the downstream signal (from F to F′) passes through a conventional AWG, the upstream signal (from F′ to A1/A2) sees an optical power (beam) combiner; inset 3, field distribution with an interference pattern at the input port of the AWs for the upstream signal; inset 4, a zoomed-in view of part 2 of the AWs, where ΔL′ and dA are the equivalent unit length difference and unit width, respectively; inset 5, interference fringes at the output channels for the upstream signal, where dO is the interference fringe gap matching to the gap between the output waveguides.
    Fig. 2. (a) Schematic (top) view of the hybrid optical wavelength demultiplexer and power combiner; inset 1, cross-sectional view of the Si photonic wire; inset 2, a schematic (top) view of the equivalent AWs and the modifications. (b) Illustration of the proposed structure (excluding the structure for combing the separated input ports into one): while the downstream signal (from F to F) passes through a conventional AWG, the upstream signal (from F to A1/A2) sees an optical power (beam) combiner; inset 3, field distribution with an interference pattern at the input port of the AWs for the upstream signal; inset 4, a zoomed-in view of part 2 of the AWs, where ΔL and dA are the equivalent unit length difference and unit width, respectively; inset 5, interference fringes at the output channels for the upstream signal, where dO is the interference fringe gap matching to the gap between the output waveguides.
    Electric field patterns in the (a) first FPR and (b) second FPR for the downstream signal at center wavelength λ0 when the device is working as a wavelength demultiplexer, and electric field patterns in the (c) first FPR and (d) second FPR for the upstream signal when the device is working as a power combiner.
    Fig. 3. Electric field patterns in the (a) first FPR and (b) second FPR for the downstream signal at center wavelength λ0 when the device is working as a wavelength demultiplexer, and electric field patterns in the (c) first FPR and (d) second FPR for the upstream signal when the device is working as a power combiner.
    (a) Spectral response of the downstream wavelength demultiplexer and (b) the field distribution at output channels for the upstream optical power combiner at wavelength λ1=1303.3 nm.
    Fig. 4. (a) Spectral response of the downstream wavelength demultiplexer and (b) the field distribution at output channels for the upstream optical power combiner at wavelength λ1=1303.3  nm.
    Spectral response of channels 23 to 27 (with noise) in the wavelength demultiplexer for the downstream signal.
    Fig. 5. Spectral response of channels 23 to 27 (with noise) in the wavelength demultiplexer for the downstream signal.
    Field distribution (with noise) at the output channels of the upstream optical power combiner at wavelength λ1=1303.3 nm.
    Fig. 6. Field distribution (with noise) at the output channels of the upstream optical power combiner at wavelength λ1=1303.3  nm.
    Material and Structural ParametersValues
    Silicon refractive index for λ03.476
    Silicon refractive index for λ13.503
    Silica refractive index for λ01.444
    Silica refractive index for λ11.447
    Output waveguide number NO32
    Array waveguide number NA95
    Output waveguide separation dO (μm)1.4
    Array waveguide separation dA (μm)2.4
    Input/Output/array waveguide width dW (μm)0.4
    Rowland circle diameter D (μm)168.2
    Diffraction order m23
    Free spectral range (FSR) (nm)30.6
    AW length difference (part 1) ΔL (μm)23.4
    AW length difference (part 2) ΔL (μm)1.0
    Splitting input waveguide position off demultiplexing input waveguide X (μm)19.8
    Splitting input waveguide position off demultiplexing input waveguide Z (μm)12.6
    Y branch angle (°)2
    1310/1550-nm demultiplexers length (μm)312.0
    1310/1550-nm demultiplexers width (μm)3.2
    Estimated whole device chip size (μm2)900×2500
    Table 1. Material and Structural Parameters of the Device
    Chunsheng Li, Xinyou Qiu, Xun Li. Hybrid optical wavelength demultiplexer and power combiner for TWDM PON[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(2): 97
    Download Citation