Author Affiliations
School of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou , Jiangsu 221116, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Overview of the proposed method
Fig. 2. Texture distortion blocks of DIBR image and corresponding Benford’s law feature values. (a) Reference block and black hole block; (b) geometric distortion block; (c) blurry block; (d) incorrect texture block; (e) corresponding feature value
Fig. 3. Traditional images with different distortion levels and corresponding Benford’s law feature values. (a) First-level Gaussian blur; (b) second-level Gaussian blur; (c) third-level Gaussian blur; (d) fourth-level Gaussian blur; (e) feature values extracted from six traditional images with different distortion levels
Fig. 4. The first digit probability of DCT coefficients of images with different quality
Fig. 5. DCT coefficients divided along the three directions of 45°, 90°, and 135°
Fig. 6. MSCN coefficients with different distortion
Fig. 7. Result of different training ratios
Fig. 8. Results of different distortion types and different sequences. (a) Results of six conventional distorted images; (b) results of nine sequences of images
Dataset | Number of sequences | Number of DIBR algorithms | Number of other distortions | Number of images |
---|
IVC | 3 | 7 | None | 84 | IETR | 10 | 7 | None | 140 | MCL-3D | 9 | 4 | 6 | 693 |
|
Table 1. Information of databases used in the experiments
Method | Type | IVC dataset | | IETR dataset | | MCL-3D dataset |
---|
PLCC | SRCC | RMSE | | PLCC | SRCC | RMSE | | PLCC | SRCC | RMSE | |
---|
Bosc | R | 0.5841 | 0.4903 | 0.5408 | | | | | | 0.4536 | 0.4330 | 2.2980 | | 3DSwIM | 0.6864 | 0.6125 | 0.4842 | | | | | | 0.6519 | 0.5683 | 1.9729 | | ST-SIAQ | 0.6914 | 0.6746 | 0.4812 | | 0.3345 | 0.4232 | 0.2336 | | 0.7133 | 0.7034 | 1.8233 | | MP-PSNR | 0.6729 | 0.6272 | 0.4925 | | 0.5753 | 0.5507 | 0.2032 | | 0.7831 | 0.7899 | 1.6179 | | MW-PSNR | 0.6200 | 0.5739 | 0.5224 | | 0.5301 | 0.4845 | 0.2106 | | 0.7654 | 0.7721 | 1.6743 | | SC-IQA | 0.8496 | 0.7640 | 0.3511 | | 0.6856 | 0.6423 | 0.1805 | | 0.8194 | 0.8247 | 1.4913 | | LOGS | 0.8256 | 0.7812 | 0.3601 | | 0.6687 | 0.6683 | 0.1845 | | 0.7614 | 0.7579 | 1.6873 | | APT | NR | 0.7307 | 0.7157 | 0.4546 | | 0.4225 | 0.4187 | 0.2252 | | 0.6433 | 0.6200 | 1.9870 | | MNSS | 0.7700 | 0.7850 | 0.4120 | | 0.3387 | 0.2281 | 0.2333 | | 0.3766 | 0.3531 | 2.4101 | | NIQSV | 0.6346 | 0.6167 | 0.5146 | | 0.1759 | 0.1473 | 0.2446 | | 0.6460 | 0.5792 | 1.9820 | | NIQSV+ | 0.7114 | 0.6668 | 0.4679 | | 0.2095 | 0.2190 | 0.2429 | | 0.6138 | 0.6213 | 2.0375 | | Proposed method | 0.8416 | 0.7768 | 0.4802 | | 0.5185 | 0.4132 | 0.2073 | | 0.9093 | 0.8907 | 1.1043 | |
|
Table 2. Comparison of different algorithms on three datasets
Feature | IVC | | IETR | | MCL-3D |
---|
PLCC | SRCC | RMSE | | PLCC | SRCC | RMSE | | PLCC | SRCC | RMSE |
---|
Benford’s law | 0.7927 | 0.5951 | 0.5435 | | 0.5400 | 0.3842 | 0.2000 | | 0.7156 | 0.7137 | 1.8287 | DCT coefficients of variation | 0.2829 | -0.1096 | 0.7402 | | 0.1451 | -0.0257 | 0.2334 | | 0.7302 | 0.6678 | 1.7579 | GGD | 0.7135 | -0.4372 | 0.6230 | | 0.3314 | 0.1319 | 0.2341 | | 0.8488 | 0.8301 | 1.4001 |
|
Table 3. Separate experiment of three features