• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 18, 1811011 (2021)
Rongke Gao1, Lusha Yan1、2, Chenxiang Xu2, Dekui Li2, and Zhongyi Guo2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • 2School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.1811011 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Rongke Gao, Lusha Yan, Chenxiang Xu, Dekui Li, Zhongyi Guo. Two Key Technologies Influencing on Computational Ghost Imaging Quality[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(18): 1811011 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic diagram of pseudo-thermal light correlation imaging[37]
    Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of pseudo-thermal light correlation imaging[37]
    Schematic diagram of CGI[37]
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of CGI[37]
    Traditional correlation reconstruction algorithms. (a) Reconstruction scheme based on IGI[43]; (b) comparison of results between GI with singular value decomposition and other imaging methods[46]
    Fig. 3. Traditional correlation reconstruction algorithms. (a) Reconstruction scheme based on IGI[43]; (b) comparison of results between GI with singular value decomposition and other imaging methods[46]
    Reconstruction algorithms based on compressed sensing. (a) Imaging results based on multi-scale illumination patterns[47]; (b) comparison of imaging quality of multiple reconstruction algorithms based on randomly modulated matrix[51]
    Fig. 4. Reconstruction algorithms based on compressed sensing. (a) Imaging results based on multi-scale illumination patterns[47]; (b) comparison of imaging quality of multiple reconstruction algorithms based on randomly modulated matrix[51]
    Reconstruction algorithms based on deep learning. (a) Simulation results of GI, CSGI and DLGI[56], β represents sampling rate; (b) reconstruction results of end-to-end convolution neural network[57]; (c) structural diagram of super-resolution convolution neural network based on compressed sensing[60]; (d) GI reconstruction results calculated by deep learning framework based on dynamic decoding (Y-net)[61]
    Fig. 5. Reconstruction algorithms based on deep learning. (a) Simulation results of GI, CSGI and DLGI[56], β represents sampling rate; (b) reconstruction results of end-to-end convolution neural network[57]; (c) structural diagram of super-resolution convolution neural network based on compressed sensing[60]; (d) GI reconstruction results calculated by deep learning framework based on dynamic decoding (Y-net)[61]
    Optimization schemes of Hadamard matrix based on traditional correlation reconstruction algorithms. (a) Scheme of single-pixel imaging with spatial dynamic resolution[63]; (b) Hadamard matrix sorting based on “Russian doll”[64]; (c) scheme of multi-resolution progressive correlation imaging and imaging results [65]
    Fig. 6. Optimization schemes of Hadamard matrix based on traditional correlation reconstruction algorithms. (a) Scheme of single-pixel imaging with spatial dynamic resolution[63]; (b) Hadamard matrix sorting based on “Russian doll”[64]; (c) scheme of multi-resolution progressive correlation imaging and imaging results [65]
    Optimization schemes of Hadamard matrix based on compressed sensing class reconstruction algorithms. (a) Diagram of illumination pattern based on the idea of origami[69]; (b) Hadamard matrix sorting based on “cutting cake”[70]; (c) four kinds of Hadamard matrix sorting[71]; (d) comparisons of imaging quality for different kinds of illumination patterns at different sampling rates[72]
    Fig. 7. Optimization schemes of Hadamard matrix based on compressed sensing class reconstruction algorithms. (a) Diagram of illumination pattern based on the idea of origami[69]; (b) Hadamard matrix sorting based on “cutting cake”[70]; (c) four kinds of Hadamard matrix sorting[71]; (d) comparisons of imaging quality for different kinds of illumination patterns at different sampling rates[72]
    Energy sorting diagrams of Hadamard matrix[73]
    Fig. 8. Energy sorting diagrams of Hadamard matrix[73]
    Schemes of traditional reconstruction algorithms based on optimized orthogonal transformation matrix. (a) Illumination patterns of HSPI, 4-step FSPI and 3-step binary FSPI[77]; (b) fast FSPI scheme via binary illumination[78]; (c) computational weighted FSPI scheme via binary illumination[79]
    Fig. 9. Schemes of traditional reconstruction algorithms based on optimized orthogonal transformation matrix. (a) Illumination patterns of HSPI, 4-step FSPI and 3-step binary FSPI[77]; (b) fast FSPI scheme via binary illumination[78]; (c) computational weighted FSPI scheme via binary illumination[79]
    Reconstruction algorithms based on deep learning. (a) Structure of deep convolutional auto-encoding network[83]; (b) FSPI results based on deep neural networks[84]; (c) FSPI results based on generating adversarial networks[85]
    Fig. 10. Reconstruction algorithms based on deep learning. (a) Structure of deep convolutional auto-encoding network[83]; (b) FSPI results based on deep neural networks[84]; (c) FSPI results based on generating adversarial networks[85]
    IndexSampling ratio below 1%Sampling ratio below 10%Samplingratio of 100%
    GICSGIDLGIGICSGIDLGIGICSGIDLGI
    RMSE[57]HighMediumLowHighMediumLowHighMediumLow
    SSIM[57]LowMediumHighLowMediumHighLowMediumHigh
    PSNR[60]LowMediumHighLowMediumHighLowMediumHigh
    Table 1. Performance comparisons of different reconstruction algorithms under random illumination patterns
    Illumination patternYearAlgorithmPSNRSSIMSNR
    Hadamard[67]2013Compressed sensingLowLow
    “Russian Dolls” Hadamard ordering[64]2017Correlation algorithmMediumMedium
    Haar transform Hadamard ordering[68]2019FWHTHighHighHigh
    Origami pattern[69]2019Compressed sensingHighHigh
    Illumination patternYearAlgorithmPSNRSSIMSNR
    Multi-resolution Hadamard derivative pattern[65]2019Correlation algorithmHigh
    “Cake cutting” Hadamard ordering[70]2019Compressed sensingHighHigh
    High frequency ordering[71]2020TVAL3/ NESTALowLow
    Total gradient ascending order[72]2020TVAL3LowLow
    Total variation ascending Hadamard basis[72]2020TVAL3HighHigh
    Hadamard[73]2020Deep learningHighHigh
    Table 2. Comparisons of construction methods of different illumination pattern and reconstruction performance
    Rongke Gao, Lusha Yan, Chenxiang Xu, Dekui Li, Zhongyi Guo. Two Key Technologies Influencing on Computational Ghost Imaging Quality[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(18): 1811011
    Download Citation