Research Progress on Nanostructured Metal Oxides as Anode Materials for Li-ion Battery

Shiyou ZHENG; Fei DONG; Yuepeng PANG; Pan HAN; Junhe YANG

doi:10.15541/jim20200134

Journals >Journal of Inorganic Materials >Volume 35 >Issue 12 >Page 1295 > Article

Journal of Inorganic Materials
Vol. 35, Issue 12, 1295 (2020)

Research Progress on Nanostructured Metal Oxides as Anode Materials for Li-ion Battery

Shiyou ZHENG, Fei DONG, Yuepeng PANG, Pan HAN, and Junhe YANG

Author Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China

show less

DOI: 10.15541/jim20200134 Cite this Article

Shiyou ZHENG, Fei DONG, Yuepeng PANG, Pan HAN, Junhe YANG. Research Progress on Nanostructured Metal Oxides as Anode Materials for Li-ion Battery[J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2020, 35(12): 1295 Copy Citation Text

show less

(a, b) SEM images of SnO2/C-NTs; (c) Cycling performance at 500 mA/g, and (d) rate capabilities of SnO2-NTs and SnO2/C-NTs[23]

1. (a, b) SEM images of SnO₂/C-NTs; (c) Cycling performance at 500 mA/g, and (d) rate capabilities of SnO₂-NTs and SnO₂/C-NTs^[23]

Download full size | View in the Article

(a) Illustration of the synthesis principles of ultrafine SnO2 NPs immobilized in the mesopore channels of mesoporous carbon; (b) Cycle performance at 200 mA/g between 0.005 and 3 V, and (c) rate performance of electrodes based on different SnO2 content[31]

2. (a) Illustration of the synthesis principles of ultrafine SnO₂ NPs immobilized in the mesopore channels of mesoporous carbon; (b) Cycle performance at 200 mA/g between 0.005 and 3 V, and (c) rate performance of electrodes based on different SnO₂ content^[31]

Download full size | View in the Article

3. (a) SEM image, and (b) cycle performance at 100 mA/g of CuO NRAs^[42]

Download full size | View in the Article

4. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of hollow CuO@NCS composites; (b) Cycle performance of CuO@NCS at 100 mA/g^[46]

Download full size | View in the Article

5. TEM images of (a) Fe₂O₃-graphene particle-on-sheet composite, and (b-d) Fe₂O₃-graphene sheet-on-sheet composite^[57]

Download full size | View in the Article

6. (a) Illustration for the synthetic procedure, (b) TEM image, and (c) rate capabilities of Fe₃O₄@N-HPCNs^[63]

Download full size | View in the Article

7. (a) Structure diagrams of the amorphous porous CoSnO₃/Au composite nanocubes; Cycle performance of the amorphous porous CoSnO₃/Au composite nanocubes at (b) 0.2 and (c) 5 A/g^[65]

Download full size | View in the Article

8. (a) Schematic illustration for the synthetic procedure, (b) TEM image, and (c) rate capabilities of spinel Zn_xCo_3-_xO₄ hollow polyhedron^[79]

Download full size | View in the Article

Materials structure	First cyclic capacity/(mAh∙g^-1) (Current density/(A∙g^-1))	Coulombic efficiency	Cycling performance/ (mAh∙g^-1) (Current density/ (A∙g^-1), cycle number)	Rate performance/(mAh∙g^-1) (Current density/(A∙g^-1))	Ref.
SnO₂ NPs (5~20 nm)	1310 (0.1)	69%	800 (0.1, 100)	850 (1); 800 (2)	[22]
SnO₂/C-NT (15 nm)	483 (0.5)	51%	596 (0.5, 200)	683 (1); 550 (2)	[23]
SnO₂ nanosheets (7.4 nm)	1338 (0.1)	55%	763 (0.1, 300)	460 (1); 280 (2)	[24]
SnO₂ HS (50 nm)	736 (0.1)	47%	540 (0.1, 50)	550 (1); 422 (2)	[26]
SnO₂/C (50~100 nm)	998 (0.1)	69%	750 (0.1, 100)	413 (1); 325 (2)	[28]
C-SnO₂/CNT (7 nm)	1373 (1)	52%	950 (1, 100)	1100 (1); 950 (2)	[29]
SnO₂@G-SWCNT (7 nm)	1007 (0.1)	53%	785 (0.1, 100)	510 (1); 426 (2)	[30]
SnO₂@CMK-5 (4~5 nm)	694 (0.2)	71%	1039 (0.1, 100)	770 (1)	[31]
SnO₂/C (2.8 nm)	899 (1.4)	44%	560 (1.4, 100)	700 (1.4); 538 (2.8)	[32]
CuO spheres (400 nm)	590 (0.45)	66%	400 (0.45, 50)	-	[34]
CuO octahedra (5 nm)	506 (0.5)	70%	785 (0.5, 50)	488 (1); 370 (2)	[40]
CuO labyrinths (20 nm)	645 (0.1)	66%	330 (1, 100)	340 (1.3); 255 (3.4)	[41]
CuO NRAs (2~3 μm)	751 (0.1)	56%	671 (0.1, 150)	367 (1); 300 (2)	[42]
CuO spheres (10 nm)	552 (0.67)	55%	750 (0.67, 350)	650 (1.3); 600 (3.4)	[43]
CuO/MWCNT (10 nm)	462 (0.07)	69%	650 (0.07, 100)	590 (1.3); 590 (2)	[44]
Cu₂O/CuO/rGO (500 nm)	375 (0.3)	75%	570 (0.3, 100)	350 (1.3); 250 (2.7)	[45]
Cu@NCSs (45 nm)	909 (0.5)	62%	602 (0.5, 200)	760 (1); 570 (2)	[46]
Graphene/Fe₂O₃(40 nm)	1074 (0.1)	65%	800 (0.1, 50)	-	[57]
Fe₂O₃/CA (5~50 nm)	836 (0.1)	55%	635 (0.1, 100)	652 (0.4); 546 (0.8)	[58]
RG-O/Fe₂O₃ (60 nm)	1219 (0.1)	72%	1027 (0.1, 50)	970 (0.4); 760 (0.8)	[59]
Fe₃O₄@PCFs (10~60 nm)	1014 (0.2)	72%	920 (0.2, 80)	677 (1); 523 (2)	[51]
Fe₃O₄/PPy (200 nm)	493 (1)	89%	554 (1, 100)	500 (1); 330 (2)	[61]
Fe₃O₄-CNTs (50~100 nm)	845 (0.05)	77%	702 (0.05, 50)	-	[62]
Fe₃O₄@N-HPCNs (6 nm)	521 (0.1)	54%	1240 (0.1, 100)	700 (1); 600 (2)	[63]
CoMoO₄ NPs (2~10 nm)	1051 (0.2)	72%	1185 (0.2, 100)	900 (1); 850 (2)	[77]
CoSnO₃/Au cube (70 nm)	1693 (0.2)	68%	1615 (0.2, 100)	1425 (1); 1289 (2)	[65]
NiFe₂O₄ NPs (20 nm)	1177 (0.1)	79%	1390 (0.1, 20)	823 (1); 725 (3)	[70]
Zn_xCo_3-_xO₄ (10 nm)	967 (0.1)	76%	990 (0.1, 50)	1020 (0.9); 988 (2.7)	[79]
Ni_xCo_3-_xO₄ (40 nm)	1133 (0.1)	70%	1109 (0.1, 100)	864 (1); 728 (2)	[80]

Table 1. Structures and comprehensive electrochemical performances of different metal oxide anode materials

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information