Author Affiliations
1School of Management, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710100, China2Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710038, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Atmospheric scattering model
Fig. 2. Analysis results of color attenuation prior of “distant mountain” and “red building”. (a) Haze images; (b) black and white difference images; (c) relationship curves between brightness and saturation difference and scene depth
Fig. 3. Different algorithms process “distant mountain”, “road” and “building” smog images and corresponding visible edges. (a)(b) Input haze images; (c)(d) Ref. [5]; (e)(f) proposed algorithm
Fig. 4. Different algorithms process “wheatgrass”, “hill” and “orange” haze images and corresponding visible edges. (a)(b) Input haze images; (c)(d) Ref. [12]; (e)(f) proposed algorithm
Fig. 5. Different algorithms process “street”, “forest” and “village” smog images and corresponding visible edges. (a)(b) Input haze images; (c)(d) Ref. [13]; (e)(f) proposed algorithm
Fig. 6. Different algorithms process “goose”, “small building” and “mountain forest” smog images and corresponding visible edges. (a)(b) Input haze images; (c)(d) Ref. [8]; (e)(f) proposed algorithm
Fig.3 | VDI | HR |
---|
Ref. [5] | Proposedalgorithm | Ref. [5] | Proposedalgorithm |
---|
Distantmountain | 0.4376 | 0.5832 | 0.6817 | 0.8673 | Road | 0.3391 | 0.6997 | 0.4538 | 0.7261 | Building | 0.5248 | 0.6613 | 0.6254 | 0.8392 |
|
Table 1. Comparison of VDI and HR in Fig. 3 with different algorithms
Fig.4 | VDI | HR |
---|
Ref. [12] | Proposedalgorithm | Ref. [12] | Proposedalgorithm |
---|
Wheatgrass | 0.3194 | 0.6582 | 0.5833 | 0.7761 | Hill | 0.5288 | 0.7917 | 0.6702 | 0.8714 | Orange | 0.4570 | 0.6746 | 0.6091 | 0.8418 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of VDI and HR in Fig. 4 with different algorithms
Fig.5 | VDI | HR |
---|
Ref. [13] | Proposedalgorithm | Ref. [13] | Proposedalgorithm |
---|
Street | 0.4277 | 0.7301 | 0.6375 | 0.8399 | Forest | 0.4591 | 0.6228 | 0.6027 | 0.7924 | Village | 0.4370 | 0.6419 | 0.6518 | 0.9067 |
|
Table 3. Comparison of VDI and HR in Fig. 5 with different algorithms
Fig.6 | VDI | HR |
---|
Ref. [8] | Proposedalgorithm | Ref. [8] | Proposedalgorithm |
---|
Goose | 0.4136 | 0.6813 | 0.5195 | 0.7367 | Smallbuilding | 0.5288 | 0.7291 | 0.6830 | 0.8166 | Mountainforest | 0.4930 | 0.6205 | 0.4729 | 0.7804 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of VDI and HR in Fig. 6 with different algorithms