• Chinese Physics B
  • Vol. 29, Issue 9, (2020)
Feng Tang and Nan Zhao
Author Affiliations
  • Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/aba5fb Cite this Article
    Feng Tang, Nan Zhao. Quantum noise of a harmonic oscillator under classical feedback control[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(9): Copy Citation Text show less
    The block diagram of the close-loop control of a quantum sensor system. The open-loop transfer function of the oscillator is denoted by G. A second order filter F with filter time constant τ is applied to suppress high frequency noise. A PI-controller C is used to adjust the output frequency ωo so as to trace the variation of the input frequency ωi. The control parameter Kp represents the proportional term and Ki stands for the integral term. The quantum phase white noise Δϕ will be a disturbance to the output of the PI-controller. Finally, the phase shift ϕ is the output of the sensor, followed by the high-frequency-noise-filtered phase shift ϕ∼.
    Fig. 1. The block diagram of the close-loop control of a quantum sensor system. The open-loop transfer function of the oscillator is denoted by G. A second order filter F with filter time constant τ is applied to suppress high frequency noise. A PI-controller C is used to adjust the output frequency ωo so as to trace the variation of the input frequency ωi. The control parameter Kp represents the proportional term and Ki stands for the integral term. The quantum phase white noise Δϕ will be a disturbance to the output of the PI-controller. Finally, the phase shift ϕ is the output of the sensor, followed by the high-frequency-noise-filtered phase shift ϕ.
    Schematic diagram of bandwidth improvement by PID feedback. These curves are depicted in the log–log coordinates, where A(n)(ω¯) and A(d)(ω¯) represent the numerator and denominator of A∼(ω¯), respectively. The numbers +2 and +4 indicate that the terms proportional to ω¯2 and ω¯4 are dominant in those frequency intervals. The number –2 indicates that the functions decay as 1/ω¯2 in those frequency intervals.
    Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of bandwidth improvement by PID feedback. These curves are depicted in the log–log coordinates, where A(n)(ω¯) and A(d)(ω¯) represent the numerator and denominator of A(ω¯), respectively. The numbers +2 and +4 indicate that the terms proportional to ω¯2 and ω¯4 are dominant in those frequency intervals. The number –2 indicates that the functions decay as 1/ω¯2 in those frequency intervals.
    Demonstrations of the resonant and non-resonant behaviors of the close-loop frequency responses Aclose(ω). The black curve represent the regime ki ≪ kp, while the red curve present resonant behavior with ki>kic. In this graph, kp = 100 and ki = (1 + kp)2.
    Fig. 3. Demonstrations of the resonant and non-resonant behaviors of the close-loop frequency responses Aclose(ω). The black curve represent the regime kikp, while the red curve present resonant behavior with ki>kic. In this graph, kp = 100 and ki = (1 + kp)2.
    Comparisons of frequency responses with filter F present or not. The black curve represents the frequency response of the open-loop system G. The pink and green curves describe the close-loop frequency responses of Φ1(s) = CGF/(1 + CGF) and Φ2(s) = CG/(1 + CG) when the filter F is present or not, respectively. The blue and red curves correspond to the frequency responses of A1(s) = CF/(1 + CGF) and A2(s) = A(s), respectively. The parameters used in this graph are T2 = 10 s, τ = 10−4 s, kp = 1000 and ki = 100.
    Fig. 4. Comparisons of frequency responses with filter F present or not. The black curve represents the frequency response of the open-loop system G. The pink and green curves describe the close-loop frequency responses of Φ1(s) = CGF/(1 + CGF) and Φ2(s) = CG/(1 + CG) when the filter F is present or not, respectively. The blue and red curves correspond to the frequency responses of A1(s) = CF/(1 + CGF) and A2(s) = A(s), respectively. The parameters used in this graph are T2 = 10 s, τ = 10−4 s, kp = 1000 and ki = 100.
    (a) The block diagram of the noise transfer. The noise Δϕ(s), which is here the Laplace transformation of Δϕ(t), causes a output frequency fluctuation in the PI controller, as represented by ωn(s) in the above diagram. (b) The power spectral density Sn1/2(ω) of the noise output ωn(t). The red curve is depicted with kp = 2000, which is twice over that of the black one. Other parameters used are ki = 100, T2 = 10 s, τ/T2 = 10−5, and T2g = 103.
    Fig. 5. (a) The block diagram of the noise transfer. The noise Δϕ(s), which is here the Laplace transformation of Δϕ(t), causes a output frequency fluctuation in the PI controller, as represented by ωn(s) in the above diagram. (b) The power spectral density Sn1/2(ω) of the noise output ωn(t). The red curve is depicted with kp = 2000, which is twice over that of the black one. Other parameters used are ki = 100, T2 = 10 s, τ/T2 = 10−5, and T2g = 103.
    Feng Tang, Nan Zhao. Quantum noise of a harmonic oscillator under classical feedback control[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(9):
    Download Citation