• Acta Optica Sinica (Online)
  • Vol. 2, Issue 2, 0209001 (2025)
Zhiyong Tan1, Jielei Ni1, Qianyi Wei1, Jiahui Pan1..., Yuquan Zhang1, Ke Zhang1, Xiaocong Yuan1,2 and Changjun Min1,*|Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Nanophotonics Research Centre, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics & State Key Laboratory of Radio Frequency Heterogeneous Integration, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong , China
  • 2Research Center for Frontier Fundamental Studies, Zhejiang Lab , Hangzhou 311100, Zhejiang , China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOSOL240459 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhiyong Tan, Jielei Ni, Qianyi Wei, Jiahui Pan, Yuquan Zhang, Ke Zhang, Xiaocong Yuan, Changjun Min. Research Progress on In-Situ Characterization Technology of Laser Micro-Nano Fabrication (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica (Online), 2025, 2(2): 0209001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of SEM system and example of ablation imaging[47]. (a) Schematic of in-situ laser material processing workbench, where laser sources are efficiently coupled with dual-beam SEM/FIB system through lensed fiber probes; (b) snapshots of in situ laser processing based on lensed fiber and SEM (ablation example on silicon sample)
    Fig. 1. Schematic of SEM system and example of ablation imaging[47]. (a) Schematic of in-situ laser material processing workbench, where laser sources are efficiently coupled with dual-beam SEM/FIB system through lensed fiber probes; (b) snapshots of in situ laser processing based on lensed fiber and SEM (ablation example on silicon sample)
    Schematic of structured light illumination super-resolution imaging in situ characterization system and SiC surface ablation imaging results[50].(a) Schematic of the optical system combining femtosecond laser surface ablation and structured illumination profilometry for in situ monitoring of fabricated structures;comparison of (b) AFM, (c) SIP, and (d) wide-field imaging of high spatial frequency LIPSS prepared on SiC surfaces; (e)‒(g) zoomed-in plots for three modalities; (h)‒(j) measured values at three different locations in the zoomed-in plots
    Fig. 2. Schematic of structured light illumination super-resolution imaging in situ characterization system and SiC surface ablation imaging results[50].(a) Schematic of the optical system combining femtosecond laser surface ablation and structured illumination profilometry for in situ monitoring of fabricated structures;comparison of (b) AFM, (c) SIP, and (d) wide-field imaging of high spatial frequency LIPSS prepared on SiC surfaces; (e)‒(g) zoomed-in plots for three modalities; (h)‒(j) measured values at three different locations in the zoomed-in plots
    Schematic of OCT experimental setup and reconstruction results[51].(a) Diagram of experimental setup; (b) measured intensity spectra of SLD; (c) SEM image of two printed cubes; (d) 3D OCT reconstruction result of two cubes
    Fig. 3. Schematic of OCT experimental setup and reconstruction results[51].(a) Diagram of experimental setup; (b) measured intensity spectra of SLD; (c) SEM image of two printed cubes; (d) 3D OCT reconstruction result of two cubes
    Schematic of conventional reflectance imaging experimental system and experimental results[52]. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup; (b) normalized reflectance image recorded when femtosecond laser pulse excites the sapphire; (c) reflectance image and transmission interference image at 1 ps delay; (d) relative reflectance, phase change, and absorptivity at different locations at the cross section
    Fig. 4. Schematic of conventional reflectance imaging experimental system and experimental results[52]. (a) Schematic of the experimental setup; (b) normalized reflectance image recorded when femtosecond laser pulse excites the sapphire; (c) reflectance image and transmission interference image at 1 ps delay; (d) relative reflectance, phase change, and absorptivity at different locations at the cross section
    Schematic of the experimental system for ultrafast spatiotemporal imaging with a high NA objective lens and experimental results[54].(a) Schematic of experimental setup; (b) optical micrographs of sample surface irradiated by a single pump pulse with different delay times
    Fig. 5. Schematic of the experimental system for ultrafast spatiotemporal imaging with a high NA objective lens and experimental results[54].(a) Schematic of experimental setup; (b) optical micrographs of sample surface irradiated by a single pump pulse with different delay times
    Schematic of scattered light imaging system and experimental results[57]. (a) Ultra-fast pumped probe imaging setup; (b)‒(m) CCD images of Zn surface with different delay times following a pump pulse at a fluence of 1.0 J/cm2
    Fig. 6. Schematic of scattered light imaging system and experimental results[57]. (a) Ultra-fast pumped probe imaging setup; (b)‒(m) CCD images of Zn surface with different delay times following a pump pulse at a fluence of 1.0 J/cm2
    Schematic of ultrafast elliptical polarization imaging system and experimental results[59].(a) Device diagram of PPE system; (b) ablation images of molybdenum samples at different delays and angles
    Fig. 7. Schematic of ultrafast elliptical polarization imaging system and experimental results[59].(a) Device diagram of PPE system; (b) ablation images of molybdenum samples at different delays and angles
    Schematic of time-resolved LIBS device and experimental results[60].(a) Experimental setup of time-resolved LIBS; (b) time-resolved spectral measurements (left) and time-resolved emission imaging (right)
    Fig. 8. Schematic of time-resolved LIBS device and experimental results[60].(a) Experimental setup of time-resolved LIBS; (b) time-resolved spectral measurements (left) and time-resolved emission imaging (right)
    Experimental setup and results of ultrafast quasi-3D imaging[61].(a) Experimental setup and image processing steps for ultrafast quasi-3D imaging; (b) views of ultrafast transmission, reflection dynamics, and 3D reconstruction after different fluences of laser excitation
    Fig. 9. Experimental setup and results of ultrafast quasi-3D imaging[61].(a) Experimental setup and image processing steps for ultrafast quasi-3D imaging; (b) views of ultrafast transmission, reflection dynamics, and 3D reconstruction after different fluences of laser excitation
    Schematic of real-time diffraction imaging system for DLIP processing and experimental results[64].(a) Experimental setup for DLIP irradiation combined with time-resolved reflectance and diffraction measurements; (b)(c) time-resolved measurements of relative reflectance R (blue curve) and diffraction efficiency D (red curve) by DLIP irradiation at two different laser energy densities,the bottom shows the time profile and position of excitation pulse (purple curve), and the vertical dashed line indicates the curing time; (d)(e) pseudo-color plots showing the evolution of relative reflectivity R and diffraction efficiency D with time for DLIP excitation at different energy densities
    Fig. 10. Schematic of real-time diffraction imaging system for DLIP processing and experimental results[64].(a) Experimental setup for DLIP irradiation combined with time-resolved reflectance and diffraction measurements; (b)(c) time-resolved measurements of relative reflectance R (blue curve) and diffraction efficiency D (red curve) by DLIP irradiation at two different laser energy densities,the bottom shows the time profile and position of excitation pulse (purple curve), and the vertical dashed line indicates the curing time; (d)(e) pseudo-color plots showing the evolution of relative reflectivity R and diffraction efficiency D with time for DLIP excitation at different energy densities
    Schematic of SPSIM system and experimental results[65]. (a) Schematic of surface ablation imaging process; (b) schematic of SPSLM system and optical layout; (c) original images and corresponding reconstructed surface topographies of silicon surface ablated by a single pump pulse, captured at time delays from -0.5 to 2.5 ps
    Fig. 11. Schematic of SPSIM system and experimental results[65]. (a) Schematic of surface ablation imaging process; (b) schematic of SPSLM system and optical layout; (c) original images and corresponding reconstructed surface topographies of silicon surface ablated by a single pump pulse, captured at time delays from -0.5 to 2.5 ps
    Schematic of CSMUP system and experimental results[69].(a) System configuration diagram of CSMUP for femtosecond laser ablation measurements; (b) single laser ablation dynamics measurement results of silicon under 400 nm femtosecond laser irradiation taken by CSMUP
    Fig. 12. Schematic of CSMUP system and experimental results[69].(a) System configuration diagram of CSMUP for femtosecond laser ablation measurements; (b) single laser ablation dynamics measurement results of silicon under 400 nm femtosecond laser irradiation taken by CSMUP
    Schematic of STAMP system and experimental results[70].(a) Diagram of AOPDF-based ultrafast imaging system; (b) evolution of the shock and ionization fronts (external shock wave) as well as the contact fronts; (c) gas dynamics during laser ablation on glass
    Fig. 13. Schematic of STAMP system and experimental results[70].(a) Diagram of AOPDF-based ultrafast imaging system; (b) evolution of the shock and ionization fronts (external shock wave) as well as the contact fronts; (c) gas dynamics during laser ablation on glass
    System schematic and experimental results of CS-CMUI[73].(a) Experimental setup of CS-CMUI; (b) schematic of ITO laser ablation; (c)(e) spatiotemporal intensity and phase evolution during ITO ablation; (d) relative transmittance ΔT=T (green dashed line) calculated from 2D intensity image in Fig.14(c), correlated with the corresponding result of streak camera 1D measurement (orange line)
    Fig. 14. System schematic and experimental results of CS-CMUI[73].(a) Experimental setup of CS-CMUI; (b) schematic of ITO laser ablation; (c)(e) spatiotemporal intensity and phase evolution during ITO ablation; (d) relative transmittance ΔT=T (green dashed line) calculated from 2D intensity image in Fig.14(c), correlated with the corresponding result of streak camera 1D measurement (orange line)
    Characterization techniqueSpatial resolutionTime resolutionAdvantageDisadvantage
    Geometric quantityin-situ characterizationScanning electron microscope (SEM)46-49<1 nmHigh spatial resolution for microstructure morphology observationRequires vacuum environment, complicated sample preparation, not suitable for dynamic observation, not applicable to insulated samples
    Structure illumination microscopy (SIM)50121‒160 nmPushing the limits of optical diffraction for high-resolution 3D imagingComplex system and time-consuming calculations
    Optical coherence tomography (OCT)511.9 μm(transverse); 2.7 μm(axial)Non-invasive 3D imaging with real-time monitoring for imaging the internal structure of transparent materialsLower horizontal resolution
    Ultrafast characterization based on multipulse pump-probeConventional reflectance imaging5220 μmSub-picosecondThe system is simple to build and suitable for preliminary analysis or high frequency measurementsLimited information, usually only reveals surface light reflection intensity
    High NA objective lens for ultra-fast imaging54200‒300 nmPicosecondHigh-resolution capture of dynamic processes with enhanced signal-to-noise ratioSmaller field of view, complex system configuration, limited depth of focus
    Scattered light imaging571 μm10 psProvides near-zero background and high contrast ratioSensitive to sample surface conditions and high system accuracy requirements
    Ultrafast elliptical polarization technique590.8 μmSub-picosecondAcquisition of complex refractive indices at sub-picosecond time resolution for measurement of optical parameters in dynamic processesComplex system with high system accuracy requirements
    Ultrafast characterization based on multipulse pump-probeTime-resolved LIBS spectroscopy60Submicron2 nsHighly accurate chemical composition analysis for fine area elemental analysisNot suitable for heat sensitive samples, cannot handle complex backgrounds
    Quasi-3D ultrafast imaging61Submicron10 fsObtaining a more complete picture of the plasma state and dynamic processes through dual viewsHigh system cost, complex data processing, not a complete substitute for real 3D imaging
    Real-time diffraction imaging for direct laser interference patterning processing62-63SubmicronNanosecondHigh-resolution real-time 3D surface structure dynamic visualizationIt mainly provides information on surface morphology, making it difficult to gain insight into the internal changes of the material
    Single probe structured light microscopy(SPSIM)65478 nm (transverse);22 nm (axial)256 fsSingle frame imaging, large field of view, 3D imaging capabilityInability to achieve spatial super-resolution
    Single pulse ultrafast imagingChirped spectral mapping ultrafast photography(CSMUP)69-70SubmicronPicosecond to femtosecondSingle-shot imaging records ultrafast processes for irreversible eventsLimited spatial resolution due to camera filters
    Sequentially timed all-optical mapping photography(STAMP)71SubmicronSub-picosecond to picosecondCapture multiple time points in a single exposure for non-repeatable phenomenaDependence of frame rate and time resolution, difficult to get both
    Compressive sensing based coherent modulation ultrafast imaging technique (CS-CMUI)7313.92 μmNanosecondSimultaneous acquisition of intensity and phase information for precise imaging of dynamic scenesSpatial resolution is limited by camera performance, requires high-precision system calibration and high detector requirements
    Table 1. Spatio-temporal resolution metrics and advantages and disadvantages of various laser micro-nano fabrication characterization techniques
    Zhiyong Tan, Jielei Ni, Qianyi Wei, Jiahui Pan, Yuquan Zhang, Ke Zhang, Xiaocong Yuan, Changjun Min. Research Progress on In-Situ Characterization Technology of Laser Micro-Nano Fabrication (Invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica (Online), 2025, 2(2): 0209001
    Download Citation