• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 39, Issue 2, 0215001 (2019)
Zhe Zhang*, Jin Sun, and Liutao Yang
Author Affiliations
  • College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211106, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201939.0215001 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhe Zhang, Jin Sun, Liutao Yang. Tracking Algorithm Based on Correlation Filter Fusing with Keypoint Matching[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 0215001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Framework of long-term tracking with CFMK
    Fig. 1. Framework of long-term tracking with CFMK
    Response fusion of multiple features
    Fig. 2. Response fusion of multiple features
    Tracking results for nine kinds of trackers on different databases. (a) Tracking success rate and (b) tracking precisionfor OTB-13 database; (c) tracking success rate and (d) tracking precision for OTB-15 database
    Fig. 3. Tracking results for nine kinds of trackers on different databases. (a) Tracking success rate and (b) tracking precisionfor OTB-13 database; (c) tracking success rate and (d) tracking precision for OTB-15 database
    Comparison of tracking success rate for each algorithm under eleven kinds of scenes. (a) In-plane rotation; (b) low resolution; (c) object occlusion; (d) out of view; (e) out-of-plane rotation; (f) scale variation; (g) fast motion; (h) background clutter; (i) motion blur; (j) object deformation; (k) illumination variation
    Fig. 4. Comparison of tracking success rate for each algorithm under eleven kinds of scenes. (a) In-plane rotation; (b) low resolution; (c) object occlusion; (d) out of view; (e) out-of-plane rotation; (f) scale variation; (g) fast motion; (h) background clutter; (i) motion blur; (j) object deformation; (k) illumination variation
    Tracking result graphs in partial sequences for six kinds of tracking algorithms. (a) BlurOwl; (b) Liquor; (c) Box; (d) Jogging 1; (e) Jogging 2; (f) Tigger
    Fig. 5. Tracking result graphs in partial sequences for six kinds of tracking algorithms. (a) BlurOwl; (b) Liquor; (c) Box; (d) Jogging 1; (e) Jogging 2; (f) Tigger
    Value of KMean DPMean OP
    OTB-13OTB-15OTB-13OTB-15
    10.8850.7960.6420.569
    20.8710.7880.6300.562
    30.8740.7960.6330.569
    40.8710.7950.6320.568
    50.8710.7950.6330.567
    Table 1. Mean DP and OP on different databases for proposed algorithm under different values of K
    AlgorithmMean FPS (OTB-15) /(frame·s-1)Mean DPMean OP
    OTB-13OTB-15OTB-13OTB-15
    CSK440.410.5450.5180.3980.382
    KCF98.490.7040.6750.5000.470
    DSST46.440.7370.6930.5540.520
    LCT24.180.8480.7620.5930.527
    SKSCF39.290.8640.7720.6230.549
    STAPLE76.700.7820.7840.5930.578
    SRDCF5.420.8380.7890.6260.598
    BACF32.120.8490.8170.6450.616
    Proposed29.830.8850.7960.6420.569
    Table 2. Mean tracking performance parameters on different databases for nine kinds of tracking algorithms
    Zhe Zhang, Jin Sun, Liutao Yang. Tracking Algorithm Based on Correlation Filter Fusing with Keypoint Matching[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 0215001
    Download Citation