• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 15, 152801 (2019)
Li Yuan1, Jishou Yuan1、*, and Dezheng Zhang2
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Automation and Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2 School of Computer and Communications Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.152801 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Li Yuan, Jishou Yuan, Dezheng Zhang. Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on DeepLab-v3+[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(15): 152801 Copy Citation Text show less
    System diagram of remote sensing image classification based on DeepLab-v3+
    Fig. 1. System diagram of remote sensing image classification based on DeepLab-v3+
    Diagrams of abtrous convolution[11]. (a) Sparse feature extraction; (b) dense feature extraction
    Fig. 2. Diagrams of abtrous convolution[11]. (a) Sparse feature extraction; (b) dense feature extraction
    Structure of atrous spatial pyramid pooling
    Fig. 3. Structure of atrous spatial pyramid pooling
    Structure of encoder-decoder module
    Fig. 4. Structure of encoder-decoder module
    Example of dataset. (a) Original images; (b) labels
    Fig. 5. Example of dataset. (a) Original images; (b) labels
    Loss curve
    Fig. 6. Loss curve
    64 feature maps obtained from the first convolution layer
    Fig. 7. 64 feature maps obtained from the first convolution layer
    Segmentation effect by DeepLab-v3+; (a) Original image; (b) segmentation result by DeepLab-v3+
    Fig. 8. Segmentation effect by DeepLab-v3+; (a) Original image; (b) segmentation result by DeepLab-v3+
    Comparison of loss of different models
    Fig. 9. Comparison of loss of different models
    Comparison of segmentation results of DeepLab-v3+ and other models. (a) Original images; (b) segmentation results of FCN; (c) segmentation results of U-Net; (d) segmentation results of DeepLab-v3+
    Fig. 10. Comparison of segmentation results of DeepLab-v3+ and other models. (a) Original images; (b) segmentation results of FCN; (c) segmentation results of U-Net; (d) segmentation results of DeepLab-v3+
    Segmentation results of DeepLab-v3+ and other models on GID dataset. (a) Original image; (b) segmentation result of FCN; (c) segmentation result of U-Net; (d) segmentation result of DeepLab-v3+
    Fig. 11. Segmentation results of DeepLab-v3+ and other models on GID dataset. (a) Original image; (b) segmentation result of FCN; (c) segmentation result of U-Net; (d) segmentation result of DeepLab-v3+
    ParameterValue
    base_lr0.0001
    lr_decay5
    batch_size10
    weight_decay0.0001
    max_iter100
    Table 1. Training parameters
    ModelMIoUTime /h
    FCN0.50681.9
    U-Net0.50743.1
    DeepLab-v3+0.57431.2
    Table 2. Precision and running time of DeepLab-v3+ and other models
    ModelMIoU
    FCN0.5606
    U-Net0.5782
    DeepLab-v3+0.6426
    Table 3. Precision of DeepLab-v3+ and other models on GID dataset
    Li Yuan, Jishou Yuan, Dezheng Zhang. Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on DeepLab-v3+[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(15): 152801
    Download Citation