• Chinese Physics C
  • Vol. 44, Issue 1, (2020)
Yu Bai1、*, Chun-Hui Chen1、*, Ya-Quan Fang1、*, Gang Li1、*, Man-Qi Ruan1、*, Jing-Yuan Shi1、2, Bo Wang1、2, Pan-Yu Kong1、2, Bo-Yang Lan1, and Zhan-Feng Liu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3160, USA
  • 1Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences3Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 1School of Physics, Southeast University1School of Physics, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
  • 2Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Northeastern University5Department of Physics, College of Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
  • 2School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University6School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
  • 2School of physics and astronomy, the University of Manchester4School of physics and astronomy, the University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, M13 9PL, UK
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/1/013001 Cite this Article
    Yu Bai, Chun-Hui Chen, Ya-Quan Fang, Gang Li, Man-Qi Ruan, Jing-Yuan Shi, Bo Wang, Pan-Yu Kong, Bo-Yang Lan, Zhan-Feng Liu. Measurements of decay branching fractions of in associated production at the CEPC *[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2020, 44(1): Copy Citation Text show less
    (color online) 3D-fit result projected on three dimension: (a) fit result projected on recoil mass distribution in channel, (b) fit result projected on recoil mass distribution in channel, (c) fit result projected on B-likeness distribution in channel, (d) fit result projected on B-likeness distribution in channel, (e) fit result projected on C-likeness distribution in channel, (f) fit result projected on C-likeness distribution in channel.
    Fig. 1. (color online) 3D-fit result projected on three dimension: (a) fit result projected on recoil mass distribution in channel, (b) fit result projected on recoil mass distribution in channel, (c) fit result projected on B-likeness distribution in channel, (d) fit result projected on B-likeness distribution in channel, (e) fit result projected on C-likeness distribution in channel, (f) fit result projected on C-likeness distribution in channel.
    (color online) Toy MC test result in terms of pull of signal strength in each channel. The pull distributions are fitted with Gaussian function.
    Fig. 2. (color online) Toy MC test result in terms of pull of signal strength in each channel. The pull distributions are fitted with Gaussian function.
    channel
    signals background other Higgs backgroundirreducible backgroundother SM background
    original2.45×1041.10×1041.01×1061.05×1064.96×108
    lepton pair selection without recoil mass cut1.51×1046.56×1032271.09×1042.79× 104
    jets pair selection and lepton pair recoil mass cut for fit region1.32×1041.80×1031087.75×10343.6
    signal region1.31× 1041.80× 10396.15.78× 10338.4
    channel
    signals background other Higgs backgroundirreducible backgroundother SM background
    original2.63× 1041.17× 1041.01× 1061.62× 1064.95× 108
    lepton pair selection without recoil mass cut9.17× 1033.53× 1031289.00× 1037.11× 104
    jets pair selection and recoil lepton pair mass cut of fit region7.14× 10391756.18.63× 10369.4
    signal region7.13× 10391336.44.14× 10367.4
    Table 1. Event yields of cut flow. Signal events are combined. and background refers to the background which Higgs are produced associated with and , but decay to final states other than . 'Other Higgs background' stands for the Higgs production process different from the signal. 'Irreducible SM background' is the jet pair process without Higgs productions. 'Other SM background' includes all the other background processes. The 'fit region' will be described in Section 5.
    Higgs boson production
    Higgs boson decay
    statistic uncertainty1.1%10.5%5.4%1.6%14.7%10.5%
    fixed background−0.2%+4.1%7.6%−0.2%+4.1%7.6%
    +0.1%−4.2%+0.1%−4.2%
    event selection+0.7%+0.4%+0.7%+0.7%+0.4%+0.7%
    −0.2%−1.1%−1.7%−0.2%−1.1%−1.7%
    flavor tagging−0.4%+3.7%+0.2%−0.4%+3.7%+0.2%
    +0.2%−5.0%−0.7%+0.2%−5.0%−0.7%
    combined systematic uncertainty+0.7%+5.5%+7.6%+0.7%+5.5%+7.6%
    −0.5%−6.6%−7.8%−0.5%−6.6%−7.8%
    Table 2. Uncertainties on , and .
    Yu Bai, Chun-Hui Chen, Ya-Quan Fang, Gang Li, Man-Qi Ruan, Jing-Yuan Shi, Bo Wang, Pan-Yu Kong, Bo-Yang Lan, Zhan-Feng Liu. Measurements of decay branching fractions of in associated production at the CEPC *[J]. Chinese Physics C, 2020, 44(1):
    Download Citation