• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 19, Issue 11, 110601 (2021)
Min’an Chen, Xianqing Jin*, Shangbin Li, and Zhengyuan Xu**
Author Affiliations
  • CAS Key Laboratory of Wireless-Optical Communications, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202119.110601 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Min’an Chen, Xianqing Jin, Shangbin Li, Zhengyuan Xu. Compensation of turbulence-induced wavefront aberration with convolutional neural networks for FSO systems[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2021, 19(11): 110601 Copy Citation Text show less
    Block diagram of an AO system with deep learning for FSO communication. BS, beam splitter. Inset: AlexNet structure.
    Fig. 1. Block diagram of an AO system with deep learning for FSO communication. BS, beam splitter. Inset: AlexNet structure.
    (a) Normalized power as a function of mode count and (b) phases of the first ten Zernike modes. Test error and power penalty for different (c), (d) numbers of Zernike modes (K), (e), (f) quantization bits, and (g), (h) CNN structures. (c)–(f) D/r0 = 16. (g), (h) D/r0 = 0–16.
    Fig. 2. (a) Normalized power as a function of mode count and (b) phases of the first ten Zernike modes. Test error and power penalty for different (c), (d) numbers of Zernike modes (K), (e), (f) quantization bits, and (g), (h) CNN structures. (c)–(f) D/r0 = 16. (g), (h) D/r0 = 0–16.
    Comparison in power penalty among SPGD, SA, and AlexNet-based CNN.
    Fig. 3. Comparison in power penalty among SPGD, SA, and AlexNet-based CNN.
    Experimental setup for evaluation of a CNN-based AO system and the corresponding block diagram.
    Fig. 4. Experimental setup for evaluation of a CNN-based AO system and the corresponding block diagram.
    (a) Loss performance versus epochs for training CNN. (b) Estimated Zernike coefficients and absolute errors. (c) Wavefront aberration and (d) corresponding intensity images (D/r0 = 16).
    Fig. 5. (a) Loss performance versus epochs for training CNN. (b) Estimated Zernike coefficients and absolute errors. (c) Wavefront aberration and (d) corresponding intensity images (D/r0 = 16).
    Power penalty in the weak/strong turbulence case. Inset: power penalty versus RMS of estimated wavefront errors (D/r0 = 16).
    Fig. 6. Power penalty in the weak/strong turbulence case. Inset: power penalty versus RMS of estimated wavefront errors (D/r0 = 16).
    Min’an Chen, Xianqing Jin, Shangbin Li, Zhengyuan Xu. Compensation of turbulence-induced wavefront aberration with convolutional neural networks for FSO systems[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2021, 19(11): 110601
    Download Citation