Author Affiliations
1Thin Film Optics Laboratory, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China2School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China3Key Laboratory of High Power Laser Materials, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China4CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China5Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Scheme of the 2D beam scanning system. The incident beam (outgoing from the first stage addressing LCOPA) into multiplexed VBGs is first deflected to each amplified angle, then the second LCOPA finely controls and fills the beam in each exit angle. The LCOPA is capable of achieving precise angular deflection of the beam within the cone-shaped range.
Fig. 2. (a) Typical schematic of volume Bragg grating recording (purple line) as well as diffraction (red line), where the angle is positive when it is turned counterclockwise from the
z-axis. (b) Schematic diagram of the beam emerging from the VBG, where the
z-axis coincides with the front surface normal of the recording medium, channel-A corresponds to the channel with no rotation angle and channel-B corresponds to the channel with a rotation angle of
.
Fig. 3. Relationship between grating thickness and diffraction efficiency as well as that between refractive index modulation and diffraction efficiency, under
and
. The red line corresponds to Equation (11).
Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of three VBGs working as an amplifier. The beam is deflected to point-M by VBG1 when the incident angle and rotation angle of the incident beam are 1.5° and 0°, respectively, and is deflected to point-N by VBG2 when the incident angle and rotation angle of the incident beam are 3° and 30°, respectively.
Fig. 5. Scheme of DE measurement of multiplexed VBGs. The sample is positioned on a motorized rotational stage and different grating channels are tested using a sample stage, which allows the sample to be rotated around the front surface normal.
Fig. 6. (a) DE and deviation angle of each channel. Experimental angle selectivity curves for the incident angle (b) and exit angle (c) of the first channel in each grating.
Fig. 7. The RIM fitting curve of the first channel of each monolithic VBG and the corresponding picture. The total RIM of a sample would be calculated by summing the RIM of each channel, which is 1.16 × 10–3 for VBG1 (a), 1.57 × 10–3 for VBG2 (b) and 1.37 × 10–3 for VBG3 (c).
| Rotation angle | Peristrophic | Number | Incident | Exit | Grating | Slant | |
---|
Grating | between | angular selectivity | of | angle in the | angle in the | period | angle | Thickness |
---|
number | channels
$\theta$
(°) |
$\mathrm{d}\theta$
(°) | channels | air
${\theta}_{\mathrm{i}}$
(°) | air
${\theta}_{\mathrm{o}}$
(°) |
$\Lambda$
(nm) |
$\varphi$
(°) |
$d$
(mm) |
---|
VBG1 | 60 | 20.94 | 6 | 1.5 | 10 | 5318.1 | 92.84 | 3 | VBG2 | 30 | 10.3 | 12 | 3 | 20 | 2685.1 | 95.62 | 3 | VBG3 | 20 | 6.67 | 18 | 4.5 | 30 | 1820.2 | 98.28 | 4 |
|
Table 1. Key parameters of the designed three VBGs.