• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 44, Issue 1, 0106020 (2024)
Zhihong Liang1, Kaiwen Deng1, Yunlong Ma2, Minghua Wang1, Debo Liu2, Huiqiang Wu2, and Yishou Wang1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian , China
  • 2Beijing Institute of Astronautical Systems Engineering, Beijing 100076, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS231457 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zhihong Liang, Kaiwen Deng, Yunlong Ma, Minghua Wang, Debo Liu, Huiqiang Wu, Yishou Wang. An Adaptive Post-Processing Algorithm for Strain Reading Anomalies in Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(1): 0106020 Copy Citation Text show less
    Types of SRAs for DOFS. (a) Pressure vs. time; (b) normal strain response; (c) HL-SRAs; (d) HF-SRAs
    Fig. 1. Types of SRAs for DOFS. (a) Pressure vs. time; (b) normal strain response; (c) HL-SRAs; (d) HF-SRAs
    SRAs processing method with AGTOM
    Fig. 2. SRAs processing method with AGTOM
    Reinforced composite tank. (a) Geometric size; (b) structural shape; (c) structural surface; (d) structural interior
    Fig. 3. Reinforced composite tank. (a) Geometric size; (b) structural shape; (c) structural surface; (d) structural interior
    Testing flowchart
    Fig. 4. Testing flowchart
    DOFS network design. (a) Design drawing of sensor network; (b) actual layout diagram
    Fig. 5. DOFS network design. (a) Design drawing of sensor network; (b) actual layout diagram
    Original strain results (with SRAs)
    Fig. 6. Original strain results (with SRAs)
    Original strain results (without SRAs). (a) Strain results in length position 0-400 mm; (b) strain results at length position of 100 mm
    Fig. 7. Original strain results (without SRAs). (a) Strain results in length position 0-400 mm; (b) strain results at length position of 100 mm
    Original strain results (with SRAs). (a) Case Ⅰ HL-SRAs; (b) case Ⅱ HL-SRAs; (c) case Ⅲ HL-SRAs; (d) case IV HL-SRAs; (e) case Ⅰ HF-SRAs; (f) case Ⅱ HF-SRAs; (g) case Ⅲ HF-SRAs; (h) case Ⅳ HF-SRAs
    Fig. 8. Original strain results (with SRAs). (a) Case Ⅰ HL-SRAs; (b) case Ⅱ HL-SRAs; (c) case Ⅲ HL-SRAs; (d) case IV HL-SRAs; (e) case Ⅰ HF-SRAs; (f) case Ⅱ HF-SRAs; (g) case Ⅲ HF-SRAs; (h) case Ⅳ HF-SRAs
    Comparison of post-processing results for different methods (HL-SRAs). (a) Case Ⅰ HL-SRAs; (b) case Ⅱ HL-SRAs; (c) case Ⅲ HL-SRAs; (d) case Ⅳ HL-SRAs
    Fig. 9. Comparison of post-processing results for different methods (HL-SRAs). (a) Case Ⅰ HL-SRAs; (b) case Ⅱ HL-SRAs; (c) case Ⅲ HL-SRAs; (d) case Ⅳ HL-SRAs
    Comparison of post-processing results for different methods (HF-SRAs). (a) Case Ⅰ HF-SRAs; (b) case Ⅱ HF-SRAs; (c) case Ⅲ HF-SRAs; (d) case Ⅳ HF-SRAs
    Fig. 10. Comparison of post-processing results for different methods (HF-SRAs). (a) Case Ⅰ HF-SRAs; (b) case Ⅱ HF-SRAs; (c) case Ⅲ HF-SRAs; (d) case Ⅳ HF-SRAs
    TypeDBIkST
    Case Ⅰ HL-SRAs0.00142115.72
    Case Ⅱ HL-SRAs0.00153126.85
    Case Ⅲ HL-SRAs0.01162277.02
    Case Ⅳ HL-SRAs0.02961056.72
    Case Ⅰ HF-SRAs0.00272263.85
    Case Ⅱ HF-SRAs0.00812120.65
    Case Ⅲ HF-SRAs0.00262478.16
    Case Ⅳ HF-SRAs0.00262126.68
    Table 1. Adaptive thresholds for different typical cases
    TypeRaw dataPICMGTMAGTOM
    Case Ⅰ HL-SRAs0.4130.3830.9960.994
    Case Ⅱ HL-SRAs0.3070.5120.9920.984
    Case Ⅲ HL-SRAs0.4370.2180.7980.971
    Case Ⅳ HL-SRAs0.3400.4540.9200.965
    Case Ⅰ HF-SRAs0.8370.8840.8550.933
    Case Ⅱ HF-SRAs-0.008-0.2240.8830.929
    Case Ⅲ HF-SRAs0.4410.7760.8320.917
    Case Ⅳ HF-SRAs0.2480.1070.7570.954
    Table 2. PCC results for post-processed curves and strain curves without SRAs
    Zhihong Liang, Kaiwen Deng, Yunlong Ma, Minghua Wang, Debo Liu, Huiqiang Wu, Yishou Wang. An Adaptive Post-Processing Algorithm for Strain Reading Anomalies in Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(1): 0106020
    Download Citation