• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 60, Issue 1, 0114002 (2023)
Rujian Sun1、*, Ziwen Cao1, Xiaoguang Ma2, Zhigang Che1, Shikun Zou1, and Junfeng Wu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Surface Engineering, AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing 100024, China
  • 2Material Research Center, AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing, 100024, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP212826 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Rujian Sun, Ziwen Cao, Xiaoguang Ma, Zhigang Che, Shikun Zou, Junfeng Wu. Residual Stress and Fatigue Property of Laser Shock Peening 2050 Aluminum-Lithium Alloy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(1): 0114002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic of laser shock peening and its microstructural evolution in the peened region[8]
    Fig. 1. Schematic of laser shock peening and its microstructural evolution in the peened region[8]
    Design of hole fatigue specimen
    Fig. 2. Design of hole fatigue specimen
    Residual stress specimen after laser shock strengthening. (a) Round spot peening; (b) square spot peening
    Fig. 3. Residual stress specimen after laser shock strengthening. (a) Round spot peening; (b) square spot peening
    Evolution of range value with four different factors in the round spot peening case
    Fig. 4. Evolution of range value with four different factors in the round spot peening case
    Changing of K values at three different levels with regards to four different factors in the round spot peening case. (a) Laser power density; (b) overlapping rate; (c) impact times; (d) specimen thickness
    Fig. 5. Changing of K values at three different levels with regards to four different factors in the round spot peening case. (a) Laser power density; (b) overlapping rate; (c) impact times; (d) specimen thickness
    Evolution of range value with four different factors in the square spot peening case
    Fig. 6. Evolution of range value with four different factors in the square spot peening case
    Changing of K values at three different levels with regards to four different factors in the square spot peening case. (a) Laser power density; (b) overlapping rate; (c) impact times; (d) specimen thickness
    Fig. 7. Changing of K values at three different levels with regards to four different factors in the square spot peening case. (a) Laser power density; (b) overlapping rate; (c) impact times; (d) specimen thickness
    Residual stress test results of round spot with laser power density of 5.30 GW·cm-2, overlapping rate of 50%, and peened twice
    Fig. 8. Residual stress test results of round spot with laser power density of 5.30 GW·cm-2, overlapping rate of 50%, and peened twice
    Fatigue lives of round spot with laser power density of 5.30 GW·cm-2, overlapping rate of 50%, and peened twice
    Fig. 9. Fatigue lives of round spot with laser power density of 5.30 GW·cm-2, overlapping rate of 50%, and peened twice
    ElementCuLiMgMnAgZrFeSiTiAl
    Mass fraction /%3.2-3.90.7-1.30.2-0.60.2-0.50.2-0.70.06-0.14≤0.01≤0.1≤0.01Bal.
    Table 1. Chemical composition of 2050 aluminum-lithium alloy
    2050 aluminum-lithium alloyValue
    Density /(g·cm-32.7
    Yield strength /MPa462
    Ultimate tensile strength /MPa551
    Elongation /%11
    Young’s modulus /GPa76
    Poisson’s ratio0.38
    Table 2. Physical and mechanical properties of 2050 aluminum-lithium alloy
    LevelFactors
    ABCD
    Laser power density /(GW·cm-2Overlapping rate /%Impact timesSpecimen thickness /mm
    15.3015%12.5
    210.6133%24.0
    315.9250%315.0
    Table 3. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiment for residual stress analysis
    NumberFactors
    ABCDResidual stress /MPa
    11111
    21222
    31333
    42213
    52121
    62332
    73312
    83123
    93231
    K1
    K2
    K3
    Range
    Table 4. Design of orthogonal experiment table for residual stress analysis
    NumberFactors
    ABCDResidual stress /MPa
    11111-91.06
    21222-204.66
    31333-320.42
    42213-246.42
    52121-58.54
    62332-140.54
    73312-122.62
    83123-241.40
    93231-17.06
    K1-616.14-578.88-460.10-74.60
    K2-445.50-280.26-504.60-467.82
    K3-381.08-583.58-478.02-808.24
    Range-235.06-303.32-44.50-733.64
    Table 5. Residual stress along L direction in round spot peening case
    NumberFactors
    ABCDResidual stress /MPa
    11111-50.50
    21222-182.78
    31333-317.08
    42213-243.78
    52121-68.40
    62332-132.76
    73312-142.60
    83123-243.04
    932316.26
    K1-550.36-537.32-436.88-61.14
    K2-444.94-244.92-494.22-458.14
    K3-379.38-592.44-443.58-803.90
    Range-170.98-347.52-57.34-742.76
    Table 6. Residual stress along T direction in round spot peening case
    NumberFactors
    ABCDResidual stress /MPa
    11111-124.66
    21222-232.14
    31333-326.20
    42213-281.36
    52121-93.06
    62332-212.04
    73312-185.04
    83123-319.34
    93231-18.72
    K1-683.00-725.36-591.06-110.78
    K2-586.46-343.92-644.54-629.22
    K3-523.10-723.28-556.96-926.90
    Range-159.90-379.36-53.48-816.12
    Table 7. Residual stress along L direction in square spot peening case
    NumberFactors
    ABCDResidual stress /MPa
    11111-111.08
    21222-263.44
    31333-354.48
    42213-270.24
    52121-114.74
    62332-193.16
    73312-175.84
    83123-322.26
    93231-42.06
    K1-729.00-703.58-557.16-155.80
    K2-578.14-420.24-700.44-632.44
    K3-540.16-723.48-589.70-946.98
    Range-188.84-303.24-143.28-791.18
    Table 8. Residual stress along T direction in square spot peening case
    Rujian Sun, Ziwen Cao, Xiaoguang Ma, Zhigang Che, Shikun Zou, Junfeng Wu. Residual Stress and Fatigue Property of Laser Shock Peening 2050 Aluminum-Lithium Alloy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2023, 60(1): 0114002
    Download Citation