Author Affiliations
1Aviation Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Surface Engineering, AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing 100024, China2Material Research Center, AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute, Beijing, 100024, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Schematic of laser shock peening and its microstructural evolution in the peened region
[8] Fig. 2. Design of hole fatigue specimen
Fig. 3. Residual stress specimen after laser shock strengthening. (a) Round spot peening; (b) square spot peening
Fig. 4. Evolution of range value with four different factors in the round spot peening case
Fig. 5. Changing of K values at three different levels with regards to four different factors in the round spot peening case. (a) Laser power density; (b) overlapping rate; (c) impact times; (d) specimen thickness
Fig. 6. Evolution of range value with four different factors in the square spot peening case
Fig. 7. Changing of K values at three different levels with regards to four different factors in the square spot peening case. (a) Laser power density; (b) overlapping rate; (c) impact times; (d) specimen thickness
Fig. 8. Residual stress test results of round spot with laser power density of 5.30 GW·cm-2, overlapping rate of 50%, and peened twice
Fig. 9. Fatigue lives of round spot with laser power density of 5.30 GW·cm-2, overlapping rate of 50%, and peened twice
Element | Cu | Li | Mg | Mn | Ag | Zr | Fe | Si | Ti | Al |
---|
Mass fraction /% | 3.2-3.9 | 0.7-1.3 | 0.2-0.6 | 0.2-0.5 | 0.2-0.7 | 0.06-0.14 | ≤0.01 | ≤0.1 | ≤0.01 | Bal. |
|
Table 1. Chemical composition of 2050 aluminum-lithium alloy
2050 aluminum-lithium alloy | Value |
---|
Density /(g·cm-3) | 2.7 | Yield strength /MPa | 462 | Ultimate tensile strength /MPa | 551 | Elongation /% | 11 | Young’s modulus /GPa | 76 | Poisson’s ratio | 0.38 |
|
Table 2. Physical and mechanical properties of 2050 aluminum-lithium alloy
Level | Factors |
---|
A | B | C | D |
---|
Laser power density /(GW·cm-2) | Overlapping rate /% | Impact times | Specimen thickness /mm |
---|
1 | 5.30 | 15% | 1 | 2.5 | 2 | 10.61 | 33% | 2 | 4.0 | 3 | 15.92 | 50% | 3 | 15.0 |
|
Table 3. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiment for residual stress analysis
Number | Factors |
---|
A | B | C | D | Residual stress /MPa |
---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | | K1 | | | | | | K2 | | | | | | K3 | | | | | | Range | | | | | |
|
Table 4. Design of orthogonal experiment table for residual stress analysis
Number | Factors |
---|
A | B | C | D | Residual stress /MPa |
---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -91.06 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -204.66 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | -320.42 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -246.42 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -58.54 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | -140.54 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | -122.62 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -241.40 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -17.06 | K1 | -616.14 | -578.88 | -460.10 | -74.60 | | K2 | -445.50 | -280.26 | -504.60 | -467.82 | | K3 | -381.08 | -583.58 | -478.02 | -808.24 | | Range | -235.06 | -303.32 | -44.50 | -733.64 | |
|
Table 5. Residual stress along L direction in round spot peening case
Number | Factors |
---|
A | B | C | D | Residual stress /MPa |
---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -50.50 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -182.78 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | -317.08 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -243.78 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -68.40 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | -132.76 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | -142.60 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -243.04 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6.26 | K1 | -550.36 | -537.32 | -436.88 | -61.14 | | K2 | -444.94 | -244.92 | -494.22 | -458.14 | | K3 | -379.38 | -592.44 | -443.58 | -803.90 | | Range | -170.98 | -347.52 | -57.34 | -742.76 | |
|
Table 6. Residual stress along T direction in round spot peening case
Number | Factors |
---|
A | B | C | D | Residual stress /MPa |
---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -124.66 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -232.14 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | -326.20 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -281.36 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -93.06 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | -212.04 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | -185.04 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -319.34 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -18.72 | K1 | -683.00 | -725.36 | -591.06 | -110.78 | | K2 | -586.46 | -343.92 | -644.54 | -629.22 | | K3 | -523.10 | -723.28 | -556.96 | -926.90 | | Range | -159.90 | -379.36 | -53.48 | -816.12 | |
|
Table 7. Residual stress along L direction in square spot peening case
Number | Factors |
---|
A | B | C | D | Residual stress /MPa |
---|
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -111.08 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -263.44 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | -354.48 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -270.24 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -114.74 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | -193.16 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | -175.84 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -322.26 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | -42.06 | K1 | -729.00 | -703.58 | -557.16 | -155.80 | | K2 | -578.14 | -420.24 | -700.44 | -632.44 | | K3 | -540.16 | -723.48 | -589.70 | -946.98 | | Range | -188.84 | -303.24 | -143.28 | -791.18 | |
|
Table 8. Residual stress along T direction in square spot peening case