Journals
Advanced Photonics
Photonics Insights
Advanced Photonics Nexus
Photonics Research
Advanced Imaging
View All Journals
Chinese Optics Letters
High Power Laser Science and Engineering
Articles
Optics
Physics
Geography
View All Subjects
Conferences
CIOP
HPLSE
AP
View All Events
News
About CLP
Search by keywords or author
Login
Registration
Login in
Registration
Search
Search
Articles
Journals
News
Advanced Search
Top Searches
metasurface
laser
polarization
nir
lithium niobate
optical coherence tomography
Journals >
Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >
Volume 57 >
Issue 22 >
Page 221104 > Article
Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
Vol. 57, Issue 22, 221104 (2020)
Effect of Deconvolution Algorithm on Quality of Imaging Through Scattering Layers
Ming She
*
Author Affiliations
Party and Government Offices, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China
show less
DOI:
10.3788/LOP57.221104
Cite this Article
Set citation alerts
Ming She. Effect of Deconvolution Algorithm on Quality of Imaging Through Scattering Layers[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(22): 221104
Copy Citation Text
EndNote(RIS)
BibTex
Plain Text
show less
Fig. 1.
Principle diagram of deconvolution-based imaging through scattering layers
Download full size
Fig. 2.
Speckles detected by system. (a) Speckle
I
detected when object is number "5"; (b) speckle PSF detected when object is replaced by pinhole
Download full size
Fig. 3.
Image reconstruction results by cross-correlation deconvolution algorithm
Download full size
Fig. 4.
Image reconstruction results by Wiener filtering algorithm
Download full size
Fig. 5.
Image reconstruction results by regularized deconvolution algorithm
Download full size
Fig. 6.
Image reconstruction results by Lucy-Richardson algorithm
Download full size
N
e
MSE
PSNR /dB
SSIM
1
4.1347
0.0023
26.3277
0.0833
2
4.3687
0.0033
24.7762
0.0624
3
4.7376
0.0071
21.4597
0.0359
5
5.3122
0.0205
16.8862
0.021
10
6.0096
0.0629
12.0133
0.0122
Table 1.
Quality evaluation indexes of images reconstructed by cross-correlation deconvolution algorithm
N
e
MSE
PSNR /dB
SSIM
1
6.1395
0.1016
9.9303
0.0123
2
6.4261
0.1568
8.0459
0.0105
3
6.5963
0.2102
6.7743
0.0083
5
6.7679
0.2614
5.8264
0.0054
10
6.7586
0.2524
5.9783
0.0024
Table 2.
Quality evaluation indexes of images reconstructed by Wiener filtering algorithm
N
e
MSE
PSNR /dB
SSIM
1
6.1395
0.1016
9.9303
0.0123
2
6.4261
0.1568
8.046
0.0105
3
6.5963
0.2102
6.7741
0.0083
5
6.7679
0.2614
5.8262
0.0054
10
6.7586
0.2525
.9782
0.0024
Table 3.
Quality evaluation indexes of images reconstructed by regularized deconvolution algorithm
N
e
MSE
PSNR /dB
SSIM
1
6.1235
0.1115
9.5262
0.0019
2
5.6775
0.0723
11.406
0.0025
3
5.7138
0.0658
11.8174
0.0026
5
5.7838
0.0718
11.4362
0.0023
10
5.8628
0.0773
11.1175
0.002
Table 4.
Quality evaluation indexes of images reconstructed by Lucy-Richardson algorithm
Abstract
Get PDF(in Chinese)
Figures&Tables (10)
Equations (0)
References (31)
Cited By (1)
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Ming She. Effect of Deconvolution Algorithm on Quality of Imaging Through Scattering Layers[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(22): 221104
Download Citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTex
Plain Text
Set citation alerts for the article
Tools
Share
Set citation alerts for the article
Save the article for my favorites
Paper Information
Category: Imaging Systems
Received: Mar. 3, 2020
Accepted: Apr. 17, 2020
Published Online: Oct. 24, 2020
The Author Email: She Ming (sheming@nuaa.edu.cn)
DOI:
10.3788/LOP57.221104
Recommended Topics
laser devices and laser physics
Lasers and Laser Optics
Laser physics
laser manufacturing
Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address
Cancel
Confirm