• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 46, Issue 3, 0309002 (2019)
Hongyun Li1、*, Lijun Yun2、*, and Yin Gao3
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Quanzhou Institute of Technology, Jinjiang, Fujian 362200, China
  • 2 College of Information, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China
  • 3 Quanzhou Institute of Equipment Manufacturing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jinjiang, Fujian 362200, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL201946.0309002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hongyun Li, Lijun Yun, Yin Gao. Fog Image Enhancement Algorithm Based on Boundary-Limited Weighte Least Squares Filtering[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(3): 0309002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of algorithm
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of algorithm
    Scattering cube
    Fig. 2. Scattering cube
    Comparison of transmission images. (a) Original image; (b) dark channel image in Ref.[8]; (c) transmission image in Ref.[8]; (d) dehazing image in Ref.[8]; (e) boundary constraint image in Ref.[14]; (f) transmission image in Ref.[14]; (g) dehazing image in Ref.[14]; (h) boundary constraint image by proposed algorithm; (i) optimized transmission image by proposed algorithm; (j) dehazing image by proposed algorithm
    Fig. 3. Comparison of transmission images. (a) Original image; (b) dark channel image in Ref.[8]; (c) transmission image in Ref.[8]; (d) dehazing image in Ref.[8]; (e) boundary constraint image in Ref.[14]; (f) transmission image in Ref.[14]; (g) dehazing image in Ref.[14]; (h) boundary constraint image by proposed algorithm; (i) optimized transmission image by proposed algorithm; (j) dehazing image by proposed algorithm
    Qualitative comparison of results of different dehazing methods. (a) Original image; (b) Ref.[8]; (c) Ref.[14]; (d) Ref.[16]; (e) Ref.[17]; (f) Ref.[18]; (g) proposed algorithm
    Fig. 4. Qualitative comparison of results of different dehazing methods. (a) Original image; (b) Ref.[8]; (c) Ref.[14]; (d) Ref.[16]; (e) Ref.[17]; (f) Ref.[18]; (g) proposed algorithm
    Qualitative comparison of sky region and detail features of different dehazing methods. (a) Original image; (b) Ref.[8]; (c) Ref.[14]; (d) Ref.[16]; (e) Ref.[17]; (f) Ref.[18]; (g) proposed algorithm
    Fig. 5. Qualitative comparison of sky region and detail features of different dehazing methods. (a) Original image; (b) Ref.[8]; (c) Ref.[14]; (d) Ref.[16]; (e) Ref.[17]; (f) Ref.[18]; (g) proposed algorithm
    Fig. 4MethodeΨr-e+r-
    Ref.[8]0.1201.471.59
    Ref.[14]0.210.152.622.83
    BuildingRef.[16]0.0500.940.99
    Ref.[17]0.0401.111.15
    Ref.[18]0.1301.741.87
    Proposed0.1101.721.83
    Ref.[8]0.0200.920.94
    Ref.[14]0.0501.661.71
    MountainRef.[16]0.0100.890.9
    Ref.[17]0.020.231.291.31
    Ref.[18]0.020.091.231.25
    Proposed0.0301.51.53
    Ref.[8]0.0200.950.97
    Ref.[14]0.110.312.622.73
    MonitoringstationRef.[16]0.0401.11.14
    Ref.[17]0.0301.331.36
    Ref.[18]0.0701.932.00
    Proposed0.0301.571.6
    Ref.[8]0.010.051.21.21
    Ref.[14]0.010.051.591.6
    MarketRef.[16]0.010.951.071.08
    Ref.[17]0.010.971.531.54
    Ref.[18]00.131.641.64
    Proposed0.020.161.971.99
    Table 1. Image quality evaluation
    Hongyun Li, Lijun Yun, Yin Gao. Fog Image Enhancement Algorithm Based on Boundary-Limited Weighte Least Squares Filtering[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46(3): 0309002
    Download Citation