Fig. 1. Flow chart of RGB-D data stitching
Fig. 2. Super-pixel warping
Fig. 3. Schematic of overlap interpolation
Fig. 4. Schematic of black hole interpolation
Fig. 5. Small FOV RGB-D data acquired under four viewpoints. (a) The first view RGB image; (b) the first view depth map; (c) the second view RGB image; (d) the second view depth map; (e) the third view RGB image; (f) the third view depth map; (g) the fourth view RGB image; (h) the fourth view depth map
Fig. 6. Large FOV RGB image
Fig. 7. Spatial information clustering results of RGB-D data in RGB images and depth images of the first view and the fourth view. (a) Result of the first view RGB image segmentation; (b) result of the first view depth image segmentation; (c) result of the fourth view RGB image segmentation; (d) result of the fourth view depth image segmentation
Fig. 8. Depth map segmentation results with different number of sub-blocks. (a) 20 blocks; (b) 100 blocks
Fig. 9. Depth map segmentation result with =1
Fig. 10. Depth map segmentation results with different . (a) =0.1; (b) =8.5; (c)(d) corresponding local enlargement
Fig. 11. Comparison of overlap and black hole interpolations. (a) Overlap and black hole after direct coordinate transformation; (b) result obtained by only overlap interpolation; (c) result obtained by overlap and black hole interpolations
Fig. 12. Results of RGB-D data stitching based on spatial information clustering. (a) Result of RGB image stitching; (b) result of depth image stitching
Fig. 13. Result of RGB stitching based on global homography transformation
Fig. 14. Results of image stitching with different number of grids. (a) 49 grids; (b) 1600 grids
Parameter | Proposed method | Global homography | Grid split |
---|
PSNR | 19.2632 | 17.6843 | 17.4831 | SSIM | 0.8567 | 0.8483 | 0.8359 |
|
Table 1. Quantitative evaluation of different methods