• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 41, Issue 12, 1201002 (2021)
Jingwei Zhang and Zhongfeng Qiu*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Marine Science, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210044, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202141.1201002 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jingwei Zhang, Zhongfeng Qiu. Evaluation of Data Quality of FY-3D Satellite Sensor MERSI II over Marine Waters[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 1201002 Copy Citation Text show less
    Signal-to-noise ratio results of MERSI II and VIIRS
    Fig. 1. Signal-to-noise ratio results of MERSI II and VIIRS
    True-color red-green-blue composite image from MERSI II and VIIRS on March 23, 2019. (a) Image coverage; (b) MERSI II RGB composite image; (c) VIIRS RGB composite image
    Fig. 2. True-color red-green-blue composite image from MERSI II and VIIRS on March 23, 2019. (a) Image coverage; (b) MERSI II RGB composite image; (c) VIIRS RGB composite image
    Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on March 23, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 3. Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on March 23, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on March 23, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 4. Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on March 23, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Variation of fitting coefficient with 12 scenes remote sensing images on March 23, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 5. Variation of fitting coefficient with 12 scenes remote sensing images on March 23, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    EMAPE changes between MERSI II ρt data before and after linear fitting and VIIRS ρt data at different remote sensing images on March 23, 2019. (a) 1st matching scene; (b) 2nd matching scene; (c) 3rd matching scene; (d) 4th matching scene; (e) 5th matching scene; (f) 6th matching scene; (g) 7th matching scene; (h) 8th matching scene; (i) 9th matching scene; (j) 10th matching scene; (k) 11th matching scene; (l) 12th matching scene
    Fig. 6. EMAPE changes between MERSI II ρt data before and after linear fitting and VIIRS ρt data at different remote sensing images on March 23, 2019. (a) 1st matching scene; (b) 2nd matching scene; (c) 3rd matching scene; (d) 4th matching scene; (e) 5th matching scene; (f) 6th matching scene; (g) 7th matching scene; (h) 8th matching scene; (i) 9th matching scene; (j) 10th matching scene; (k) 11th matching scene; (l) 12th matching scene
    Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 7. Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 8. Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    EMAPE changes between MERSI II ρt data before and after linear fitting and VIIRS ρt data at different remote sensing images on May 29, 2019. (a) 1st matching scene; (b) 2nd matching scene; (c) 3rd matching scene; (d) 4th matching scene; (e) 5th matching scene; (f) 6th matching scene; (g) 7th matching scene; (h) 8th matching scene; (i) 9th matching scene; (j) 10th matching scene; (k) 11th matching scene; (l) 12th matching scene
    Fig. 9. EMAPE changes between MERSI II ρt data before and after linear fitting and VIIRS ρt data at different remote sensing images on May 29, 2019. (a) 1st matching scene; (b) 2nd matching scene; (c) 3rd matching scene; (d) 4th matching scene; (e) 5th matching scene; (f) 6th matching scene; (g) 7th matching scene; (h) 8th matching scene; (i) 9th matching scene; (j) 10th matching scene; (k) 11th matching scene; (l) 12th matching scene
    LandSeaMask distribution in China coastal water
    Fig. 10. LandSeaMask distribution in China coastal water
    Scatter density diagrams in Region1 from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 11. Scatter density diagrams in Region1 from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams in Region1 from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 12. Scatter density diagrams in Region1 from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams in Region2 from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 13. Scatter density diagrams in Region2 from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams in Region2 from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 14. Scatter density diagrams in Region2 from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on May 29, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams in Region3 from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on March 22, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 15. Scatter density diagrams in Region3 from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data on March 22, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams in Region3 from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on March 22, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 16. Scatter density diagrams in Region3 from MERSI II linear fitted ρt data and VIIRS ρt data on March 22, 2019. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data after masking sun glint. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Fig. 17. Scatter density diagrams from MERSI II and VIIRS ρt data after masking sun glint. (a) At 412 nm waveband; (b) at 443 nm waveband; (c) at 490 nm waveband; (d) at 555 nm waveband; (e) at 670 nm waveband; (f) at 746 nm waveband; (g) at 865 nm waveband
    Difference between the solar azimuth angle and the solar zenith angle of MERSI II and VIIRS varies with 12 remote sensing images
    Fig. 18. Difference between the solar azimuth angle and the solar zenith angle of MERSI II and VIIRS varies with 12 remote sensing images
    Difference between the sensor azimuth angle and the sensor zenith angle of MERSI II and VIIRS varies with 12 remote sensing images
    Fig. 19. Difference between the sensor azimuth angle and the sensor zenith angle of MERSI II and VIIRS varies with 12 remote sensing images
    ChannelnumberCentralwavelength /nmSpectralbandwidth /nmSpatialresolution /m
    147050250
    255050250
    365050250
    486550250
    5138020/301000
    61640501000
    72130501000
    8412201000
    9443201000
    10490201000
    11555201000
    12670201000
    13709201000
    14746201000
    15865201000
    16905201000
    17936201000
    18940501000
    191030201000
    Table 1. Band setting information of MERSI II in solar reflection band
    ChannelnumberCentralwavelength /nmSpectralbandwidth /nmSpatialresolution /m
    M141020750
    M244318750
    M3 (B)48610750
    M4 (G)55120750
    M5 (B, R)67120750
    M674515750
    M7 (G)86239750
    M8123820750
    M9137815750
    M10 (R)160160750
    M11225750750
    M123700180750
    M134050160750
    M148500300750
    M15107631000750
    M1612013950750
    I1 (B)64080375
    I2 (G)86530375
    I3 (R)161060375
    I43740380375
    I5114501900375
    Table 2. Band setting information of VIIRS
    No.Western PacificNo.China coastal
    DateLatitude and longitude inthe lower left cornerDateLatitude and longitude inthe lower left corner
    123 Mar. 2019*11.2°N, 135.4°E(M)10.7°N, 131.8°E(V)1316 Feb. 201934.7°N, 105.3°E(M)32.3°N, 89.9°E(V)
    230 May 2019*15.6°N, 130.0°E(M)7.0°N, 127.1°E(V)1421 Feb. 201933.0°N, 105.3°E(M)31.3°N, 89.3°E(V)
    310 Jun. 2019*14.7°N, 157.8°E(M)6.7°N, 154.2°E(V)1513 Mar. 201927.4°N, 98.0°E(M)27.4°N, 86.4°E(V)
    423 Aug. 201915.9°N, 157.2°E(M)12.6°N, 160.8°E(V)1617 Mar. 201925.8°N, 97.7°E(M)21.3°N, 109.9°E(V)
    531 Aug. 201923.3°N, 166.3°E(M)21.7°N, 168.1°E(V)1722 Mar. 201923.1°N, 104.2°E(M)20.3°N, 109.0°E(V)
    606 Sep. 201919.1°N, 172.1°E(M)24.0°N, 169.8°E(V)1825 Mar. 201922.5°N, 97.1°E(M)32.3°N, 88.3°E(V)
    704 Oct. 201910.4°N, 133.0°E(M)12.0°N, 132.5°E(V)1901 Apr. 201930.5°N, 98.4°E(M)18.4°N, 107.0°E(V)
    830 Oct. 20195.4°N, 158.3°E(M)8.5°N, 156.4°E(V)2003 Apr. 201927.9°N, 105.1°E(M)27.1°N, 85.1°E(V)
    918 Nov. 20192.2°N, 149.2°E(M)0.6°N, 148.3°E(V)2120 May 2019*30.1°N,91.1°E(M)30.9°N, 90.1°E(V)
    1027 Dec. 201910.7°N, 130.4°E(M)9.6°N, 127.3°E(V)2221 May 201924.8°N, 104.4°E(M)24.3°N, 112.6°E(V)
    1128 Dec. 201913.1°N, 159.5°E(M)11.4°N, 156.6°E(V)2329 May 2019*27.9°N, 96.2°E(M)25.5°N, 86.7°E(V)
    1229 Dec. 201910.4°N, 165.5°E(M)15.0°N, 159.6°E(V)2431 May 201924.7°N, 93.3°E(M)21.7°N, 111.2°E(V)
    Table 3. Quasi-real-time matching image information of MERSI II and VIIRS in the Western Pacific and China coastal water
    MODIS /AquaVIIRS/SNPPMERSI II /FY-3D
    λ /nmLt-typicalλ /nmRSN-VIIRSλ /nmRSN-MERSI IILt-MERSI IIRSNMERSI II*Lt-typRaSN
    4128.074101362.4±212.1412915.5±98.56.19907.34.49300(402)
    4436.984431359.1±204.1443818±96.16.01827.94.19300(387)
    4885.234861365.1±212.5490813.4±90.74.62780.93.21300(383)
    5552.855511107.2±150.1555484.5±60.12.44461.63.68500(440)
    6671.27671625.9±61.7670257.4±27.51.05246.62.78500(338)
    7480.75745431.7±40.9746192.7±18.50.62177.32.4500(280)
    8690.41862300.7±25.786599.6±22.60.33100.71.78500(240)
    16400.031160127.3±3.4164028.3±2.60.136.60.73200(41)
    21300.0082257213029.9±2.10.04940.40.12100(26)
    Table 4. Signal-to-noise ratio results of MERSI II and VIIRS
    Jingwei Zhang, Zhongfeng Qiu. Evaluation of Data Quality of FY-3D Satellite Sensor MERSI II over Marine Waters[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(12): 1201002
    Download Citation