• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 8, Issue 12, A91 (2020)
Leran Lu1, Quynh Le-Van2, Lydie Ferrier3, Emmanuel Drouard1, Christian Seassal1, and Hai Son Nguyen1、4、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Université de Lyon, Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon, INL/CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, 36 avenue Guy de Collongue, 69130 Ecully, France
  • 2College of Engineering and Computer Science, VinUniversity, Hanoi 14000, Vietnam
  • 3Université de Lyon, Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon, INL/CNRS, INSA-Lyon, 7 avenue Jean Capelle, 69621 Villeurbanne, France
  • 4Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.404743 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Leran Lu, Quynh Le-Van, Lydie Ferrier, Emmanuel Drouard, Christian Seassal, Hai Son Nguyen. Engineering a light–matter strong coupling regime in perovskite-based plasmonic metasurface: quasi-bound state in the continuum and exceptional points[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(12): A91 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Sketch of the Kretschmann–Raether configuration to investigate guided modes in a stack consisting of encapsulated perovskite thin film of thickness h on a silver substrate. (b), (c), (d) Results of transfer matrix calculations corresponding to the case h=30 nm: (b), (c) angle-resolved reflectivity spectra in TM-polarized light of (b) passive and (c) active structures; (d) field distribution of the SPP mode shown in (b). (e)–(k) Results of transfer matrix calculations corresponding to the case h=150 nm: (e)–(h) angle-resolved reflectivity spectra in (e), (g) TM and (f), (h) TE-polarized light of (e), (f) passive and (g), (h) active structures; (i)–(k) field distribution of modes shown in (e) and (f).
    Fig. 1. (a) Sketch of the Kretschmann–Raether configuration to investigate guided modes in a stack consisting of encapsulated perovskite thin film of thickness h on a silver substrate. (b), (c), (d) Results of transfer matrix calculations corresponding to the case h=30  nm: (b), (c) angle-resolved reflectivity spectra in TM-polarized light of (b) passive and (c) active structures; (d) field distribution of the SPP mode shown in (b). (e)–(k) Results of transfer matrix calculations corresponding to the case h=150  nm: (e)–(h) angle-resolved reflectivity spectra in (e), (g) TM and (f), (h) TE-polarized light of (e), (f) passive and (g), (h) active structures; (i)–(k) field distribution of modes shown in (e) and (f).
    (a) Design of the perovskite metasurface. (b), (d), (e), (f) Folded dispersion of different guided modes extracted from Figs. 1(b), 1(e), 1(f) with period a=300 nm. (c), (g), (h) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for (c) h=30 nm and (g), (h) h=150 nm. All of these calculations are carried out with a=300 nm, η=0.3, and f=0.9.
    Fig. 2. (a) Design of the perovskite metasurface. (b), (d), (e), (f) Folded dispersion of different guided modes extracted from Figs. 1(b), 1(e), 1(f) with period a=300  nm. (c), (g), (h) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for (c) h=30  nm and (g), (h) h=150  nm. All of these calculations are carried out with a=300  nm, η=0.3, and f=0.9.
    (a)–(c) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for the passive metasurface of (a) f=0.16, (b) f=0.29, and (c) f=0.57. All of these calculations are carried out with a=300 nm, η=1, and h=30 nm. (d), (e) Field distribution of the dark and bright modes. (f) Ratio of radiative quality factors as a function of kx for different values of the filling fraction f. (g), (h) Spectral position and quality factor of the dark and bright modes at kx=0 as functions of the filling fraction f.
    Fig. 3. (a)–(c) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for the passive metasurface of (a) f=0.16, (b) f=0.29, and (c) f=0.57. All of these calculations are carried out with a=300  nm, η=1, and h=30  nm. (d), (e) Field distribution of the dark and bright modes. (f) Ratio of radiative quality factors as a function of kx for different values of the filling fraction f. (g), (h) Spectral position and quality factor of the dark and bright modes at kx=0 as functions of the filling fraction f.
    (a)–(c) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for the passive metasurface of (a) f=0.4 and a=270 nm, (b) f=0.51 and a=267 nm, (c) f=0.7 and a=261 nm. All of these calculations are carried out with η=0.3 and h=150 nm. (d), (e) Field distribution of the dark and bright modes. (f) Quality factor of the bright and dark modes in (c) as a function of kx. (e), (f) Spectral position and quality factor of the dark and bright modes at kx=kEP=0.177 μm−1 as functions of the filling fraction f. In these calculations, the period a is fixed at 265 nm. (i) Dip amplitude of the reflectivity resonance as a function of the spectral detuning to EP.
    Fig. 4. (a)–(c) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for the passive metasurface of (a) f=0.4 and a=270  nm, (b) f=0.51 and a=267  nm, (c) f=0.7 and a=261  nm. All of these calculations are carried out with η=0.3 and h=150  nm. (d), (e) Field distribution of the dark and bright modes. (f) Quality factor of the bright and dark modes in (c) as a function of kx. (e), (f) Spectral position and quality factor of the dark and bright modes at kx=kEP=0.177  μm1 as functions of the filling fraction f. In these calculations, the period a is fixed at 265 nm. (i) Dip amplitude of the reflectivity resonance as a function of the spectral detuning to EP.
    (a)–(c) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for the active metasurface of (a) f=0.4 and a=270 nm, (b) f=0.51 and a=267 nm, (c) f=0.7 and a=261 nm. All of these calculations are carried out with η=0.3 and h=150 nm. (d) Quality factor of the dark and bright polaritons in (c) as a function of kx. (g), (h) Spectral position and quality factor of the dark and bright polaritons at kx=kEP=0.13 μm−1 as functions of the filling fraction f. In these calculations, the period a is fixed at 265 nm.
    Fig. 5. (a)–(c) Angle-resolved reflectivity spectra obtained from RCWA calculations for the active metasurface of (a) f=0.4 and a=270  nm, (b) f=0.51 and a=267  nm, (c) f=0.7 and a=261  nm. All of these calculations are carried out with η=0.3 and h=150  nm. (d) Quality factor of the dark and bright polaritons in (c) as a function of kx. (g), (h) Spectral position and quality factor of the dark and bright polaritons at kx=kEP=0.13  μm1 as functions of the filling fraction f. In these calculations, the period a is fixed at 265 nm.
    Leran Lu, Quynh Le-Van, Lydie Ferrier, Emmanuel Drouard, Christian Seassal, Hai Son Nguyen. Engineering a light–matter strong coupling regime in perovskite-based plasmonic metasurface: quasi-bound state in the continuum and exceptional points[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(12): A91
    Download Citation