Author Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Experimental setup for realizing the rectangular SBS filter. PC, polarization controller; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; DML, directly modulated laser; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; TLS, tunable laser source; MZM, Mach–Zehnder modulator; FBG, fiber Bragg grating; ISO, isolator; EVNA, electrical vector network analyzer; PD, photodiode; ATT, optical attenuator.
Fig. 2. In-band gain ripple and average current waveform repetition period relation with different fiber lengths of 0.2, 10.2, 20.4 km.
Fig. 3. Gain profile versus frequency at different current waveform repetition periods, including (a) 100 ns, (b) 33 ns, (c) 20 ns, (d) 14.29 ns, (e) 12.5 ns, (f) 10.53 ns, (g) 9.091 ns, (h) 8.33 ns, (i) 6.25 ns, (j) 5 ns, (k) 2.5 ns, and (l) 2 ns.
Fig. 4. Relation between temporal current waveform and chirped light spectrum of DML.
Type | External modulation[13,15,19] | Direct modulation[18] |
---|
Key composition | Laser + electrical hybrid + IQ modulator + bias control + high sampling rate DAC | DML + low sampling rate DAC | Steep edges | Better selectivity | Slightly less steep | Bandwidth | Theoretic maximum at 1/2 DAC bandwidth | Limited by driving current amplitude range | Requirements for DAC | High bandwidth (double the filter bandwidth) | Relatively low bandwidth (always no more than 500 MHz despite the filter bandwidth) | High-frequency sweeping speed for short fibers | No requirements for sweeping speed | Application scenario | High precision | Cost sensitive | Narrow bandwidth | Wide bandwidth | Long fiber | Ultrashort fiber or waveguides |
|
Table 1. Comparison Between External Modulation Scheme and Direct Modulation Scheme