• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 22, Issue 2, 021901 (2024)
Ziqi Zeng1, Shixin You1, Zixiang Yang1, Chenzhi Yuan1, Chenglong You2, and Ruibo Jin1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Hubei Key Laboratory of Optical Information and Pattern Recognition, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
  • 2Quantum Photonics Laboratory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202422.021901 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Ziqi Zeng, Shixin You, Zixiang Yang, Chenzhi Yuan, Chenglong You, Ruibo Jin. Controllable transitions among phase-matching conditions in a single nonlinear crystal[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2024, 22(2): 021901 Copy Citation Text show less
    Calculated poling period of the PPKTP crystal as a function of pump wavelength under different phase-matching conditions. The black horizontal line represents the 10 µm poling period. In this calculation, we assume the degenerate case of λs = λi = 2λp, and the temperature of the crystal is set at 25°C. As shown in (a), three phase-matching conditions are satisfied near λp = 405 nm. In (b), we show a zoomed-in plot for pump wavelengths between 400 and 410 nm. Here, these shadowed regions represent the temperature tuning range of each phase-matching condition. For each region, the upper bound and lower bound are at 25°C and 150°C, respectively.
    Fig. 1. Calculated poling period of the PPKTP crystal as a function of pump wavelength under different phase-matching conditions. The black horizontal line represents the 10 µm poling period. In this calculation, we assume the degenerate case of λs = λi = 2λp, and the temperature of the crystal is set at 25°C. As shown in (a), three phase-matching conditions are satisfied near λp = 405 nm. In (b), we show a zoomed-in plot for pump wavelengths between 400 and 410 nm. Here, these shadowed regions represent the temperature tuning range of each phase-matching condition. For each region, the upper bound and lower bound are at 25°C and 150°C, respectively.
    Experimental setup for observing controllable transitions among different SPDC processes. Here, we used two lasers at 405 and 315 nm. We control the power and polarization of the pump beam, and we also control the temperature of the PPKTP crystal. The properties of these SPDC processes are characterized using a time interval analyzer and a single-photon level spectrometer. HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarizing beam splitter; SPFs, short-pass filters; L, lens; DM, dichroic mirror; LPFs, long-pass filters; M, mirror; SMFC, single-mode-fiber coupler; SMF, single-mode fiber; FBS, fiber beam splitter; D, detector.
    Fig. 2. Experimental setup for observing controllable transitions among different SPDC processes. Here, we used two lasers at 405 and 315 nm. We control the power and polarization of the pump beam, and we also control the temperature of the PPKTP crystal. The properties of these SPDC processes are characterized using a time interval analyzer and a single-photon level spectrometer. HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarizing beam splitter; SPFs, short-pass filters; L, lens; DM, dichroic mirror; LPFs, long-pass filters; M, mirror; SMFC, single-mode-fiber coupler; SMF, single-mode fiber; FBS, fiber beam splitter; D, detector.
    Measured properties of our versatile biphoton source. (a)–(d) Spectra of the biphotons for different crystal temperatures; (e)–(h) tuning curves of the four observed SPDCs. Here, we report the center wavelengths of the signal and idler photons at different temperatures. (i)–(l) FWHMs of the signal and idler photons at different temperatures. We note that the values in (e)–(l) were obtained by fitting each spectrum to a Gaussian distribution. (m)–(p) Simulated JSIs of the biphotons.
    Fig. 3. Measured properties of our versatile biphoton source. (a)–(d) Spectra of the biphotons for different crystal temperatures; (e)–(h) tuning curves of the four observed SPDCs. Here, we report the center wavelengths of the signal and idler photons at different temperatures. (i)–(l) FWHMs of the signal and idler photons at different temperatures. We note that the values in (e)–(l) were obtained by fitting each spectrum to a Gaussian distribution. (m)–(p) Simulated JSIs of the biphotons.
    Poling OrderPhase-MatchingPolarizationPump (nm)Signal (nm)Idler (nm)d(z) (pm/V)Λ (µm)
    FirstType-0ZZZ550.821101.651101.652d33 / π = 10.7610
    Type-IZYY1070.912141.822141.822d32 / π = 2.77
    Type-IIYYZ404.63809.27809.272d24 / π = 2.32
    ThirdType-0ZZZ401.92803.84803.842d33 / 3π = 3.59
    Type-IZYY505.211010.411010.412d32 / 3π = 0.92
    Type-IIYYZ338.73677.45677.452d24 / 3π = 0.77
    FifthType-0ZZZ354.97709.94709.942d33 / 5π = 2.15
    Type-IZYY407.37814.73814.732d32 / 5π = 0.55
    Type-IIYYZ311.43622.86622.862d24 / 5π = 0.46
    Table 1. Comparison of the Nine SPDC Processesa
    Poling period10 µm
    Pump wavelength404.3 nm404.3 nm408.8 nm315 nm
    Phase-matchingType-IIType-IType-0Type-II
    PolarizationH → H + VV → H + HV → V + VH → H + V
    Poling order1st5th3rd5th
    Tuning range30°C → 150°C50°C → 70°C50°C → 120°C30°C → 150°C
    Degenerate temperature126.8°C57.2°C58.4°C62.8°C
    SC/CC (kcps)1300/45385/155400/167N/A
    Theoretical d(z) (pm/V)2d24 /π = 2.322d32 / 5π = 0.552d33 / 3π = 3.592d24 / 5π = 0.46
    Table 2. Comparison of the Four SPDC Processesa
    Ziqi Zeng, Shixin You, Zixiang Yang, Chenzhi Yuan, Chenglong You, Ruibo Jin. Controllable transitions among phase-matching conditions in a single nonlinear crystal[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2024, 22(2): 021901
    Download Citation