Author Affiliations
1Key Laboratory on Adaptive Optics, The Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610209, China2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Experimental platform. (a) Physical image; (b) size of the laser rangefinder; (c) size of the pan-tilt
Fig. 2. Framework of our system
Fig. 3. 3D point cloud obtained by our system
Fig. 4. Variance of 760 sets of data
Fig. 5. Flow chart of our algorithm
Fig. 6. Experimental data. (a) Planar imaging scene; (b) planar imaging point cloud; (c) angular imaging scene; (d) angular imaging point cloud; (e) early experiment scene; (f) unprocessed point cloud
Fig. 7. Outdoor imaging scene
Fig. 8. Outdoor imaging result
Fig. 9. Schematic diagram of the interval between two adjacent points
Fig. 10. Fitting graph of straight. (a) Straight line1; (b) straight line2
Types of target object | Wall distance | Yellow box distance |
---|
Ruler measurement | 307.20 | 269.70 | Laser rangefinder measurement | 319.90 | 280.66 | Measurement error | 12.70 | 10.96 |
|
Table 1. Distance measurement error unit:cm
Measurement data | Yellow box size |
---|
Length | Height |
---|
Ruler measurement | 20.00 | 14.00 | Laser rangefinder measurement | 20.70 | 14.40 | Measurement error | 0.70 | 0.40 |
|
Table 2. Size measurement error of the object unit:cm
Measurement data | Cube angular |
---|
Angle | 90.00 | Point cloud fitting angle | 85.73 | Fitting error | -4.27 |
|
Table 3. Angle fitting error unit: (°)
Measurement data | Wall distance measurement | Box length measurement |
---|
Early experimental measurement error | 11.52 | 12.59 | Final experimental measurement error | 4.13 | 3.50 | Error reduction | 64.15 | 72.20 |
|
Table 4. Accuracy at the beginning of the experiment and after treatment unit:%