• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 59, Issue 23, 2330003 (2022)
Yongli Bai1, Xinguo Huang1、*, Shanshan Zhang1, Xian Leng1, Yunfei Zhong1, Nan Peng2, Xiaochun Xie2, and Nan Peng1
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Packaging and Materials Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, Hunan , China
  • 2Hunan Luck Printing Co., Ltd., Changsha 410100, Hunan ,China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202259.2330003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yongli Bai, Xinguo Huang, Shanshan Zhang, Xian Leng, Yunfei Zhong, Nan Peng, Xiaochun Xie, Nan Peng. Type Identification and Concentration Quantitative Analysis of Water-Based Ink Additives Based on Visible/Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(23): 2330003 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    To address the current problem that the printability of water-based inks is difficult to detect and control accurately, a method based on visible/near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics is proposed to accurately detect the type and concentration of water-based ink additives. First, a micro-spectrometer (380-980 nm) was used to obtain spectral data of water-based ink samples containing different concentrations of alcohol, toning red, and toning yellow additives, and by extracting the characteristic bands that can completely characterize the spectral information of the samples through principal component analysis, redundant information is reduced and accurate identification of the auxiliary types is achieved. Then, the prediction models constructed by six different pretreatment methods combined with partial least squares (PLS) and interval partial least squares (iPLS) for each additive concentration were compared and discussed. The experimental results showed that the cumulative contribution rate of the first two principal components in the spectral band of 617-726 nm was as high as 99.909% by principal component analysis, and the accurate identification of water-based ink additives types was achieved. Among them, the determination coefficient and root mean square error of alcohol additive prediction model were 0.9798 and 0.0223, while the determination coefficient and root mean square error of toning yellow additive were 0.9870 and 0.0075, and the determination coefficient and root mean square error of the toning red additive were 0.9948 and 0.0038. Experimental results prove that the model established by the optimal pretreatment method combined with the iPLS method is generally better than the single PLS model, which can accurately detect the type and concentration of water-based ink additives, meet the application needs of water-based ink detection and control in the printing production process, and provide a technical basis for the later realization of online detection of water-based ink.
    Yongli Bai, Xinguo Huang, Shanshan Zhang, Xian Leng, Yunfei Zhong, Nan Peng, Xiaochun Xie, Nan Peng. Type Identification and Concentration Quantitative Analysis of Water-Based Ink Additives Based on Visible/Near-Infrared Spectroscopy[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(23): 2330003
    Download Citation