• Chinese Journal of Lasers
  • Vol. 51, Issue 1, 0102001 (2024)
Dichen Li1、2、*, Hang Zhang1、2、**, and Jianglong Cai1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
  • 2School of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/CJL231215 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dichen Li, Hang Zhang, Jianglong Cai. Development of Refractory High Entropy Alloys by Laser Additive Manufacturing: Regulating Material Properties and Manufacturing Processes (Invited)[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(1): 0102001 Copy Citation Text show less
    Typical thermal cracks[35-37]. (a)(b) Solidification cracks with irregular dendritic morphology; (c)(d) liquefaction cracks without dendritic characteristics; (e)(f) solidification cracks; (g)(h) morphology and dislocation maps of the liquefaction crack region; (i)‒(k) single pass of LPBFed AA7075 alloy shows different pool shapes and thermal crack sensitivities
    Fig. 1. Typical thermal cracks[35-37]. (a)(b) Solidification cracks with irregular dendritic morphology; (c)(d) liquefaction cracks without dendritic characteristics; (e)(f) solidification cracks; (g)(h) morphology and dislocation maps of the liquefaction crack region; (i)‒(k) single pass of LPBFed AA7075 alloy shows different pool shapes and thermal crack sensitivities
    Typical pores[32,57-58]. (a) Unfused and metallurgical pores; (b) keyhole pore; (c) shrinkage pores; (d) schematic diagrams of pore formation mechanism in LDED process
    Fig. 2. Typical pores[32,57-58]. (a) Unfused and metallurgical pores; (b) keyhole pore; (c) shrinkage pores; (d) schematic diagrams of pore formation mechanism in LDED process
    Principle of high flux forming[74]
    Fig. 3. Principle of high flux forming[74]
    High entropy alloy phase with high flux forming[74]. (a) XRD patterns; (b) measured composition versus predicted composition; (c) SEM image and elemental mapping
    Fig. 4. High entropy alloy phase with high flux forming[74]. (a) XRD patterns; (b) measured composition versus predicted composition; (c) SEM image and elemental mapping
    Backscatter image of sample section and grain direction of welded structure section obtained by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)
    Fig. 5. Backscatter image of sample section and grain direction of welded structure section obtained by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD)
    Tensile property curves of TiNbCrVNi alloy[90]
    Fig. 6. Tensile property curves of TiNbCrVNi alloy[90]
    Cross-section morphology of thin-walled parts under different process parameters[84]. (a) 2.8 J/mm; (b) 3.2 J/mm; (c) 3.6 J/mm; (d) 4.0 J/mm; (e) 4.4 J/mm
    Fig. 7. Cross-section morphology of thin-walled parts under different process parameters[84]. (a) 2.8 J/mm; (b) 3.2 J/mm; (c) 3.6 J/mm; (d) 4.0 J/mm; (e) 4.4 J/mm
    Performance test results of the samples under different processing parameters[84]. (a) Average microhardness of alloy cross-section; (b) engineering stress-strain curves of the alloy under compression at room temperature
    Fig. 8. Performance test results of the samples under different processing parameters[84]. (a) Average microhardness of alloy cross-section; (b) engineering stress-strain curves of the alloy under compression at room temperature
    LPBF forming process and geometric relationship between parameters[72]. (a) Simplified LPBF forming process. Geometric relationship between the layer thickness c and the channel spacing d for the following cases: (b) ml¯ <c, (c) ml¯ >c, and (d) ml¯ =c
    Fig. 9. LPBF forming process and geometric relationship between parameters[72]. (a) Simplified LPBF forming process. Geometric relationship between the layer thickness c and the channel spacing d for the following cases: (b) ml¯ <c, (c) ml¯ >c, and (d) ml¯ =c
    Temperature distribution in the micro-region (4 mm×2 mm×1 mm) around the 200 s laser spot of LPBF process[92]
    Fig. 10. Temperature distribution in the micro-region (4 mm×2 mm×1 mm) around the 200 s laser spot of LPBF process[92]
    LPBF formed samples[89]
    Fig. 11. LPBF formed samples[89]
    Tensile samples formed by LPBF(after polishing)[89]
    Fig. 12. Tensile samples formed by LPBF(after polishing)[89]
    Original sample formed by LDED[76]
    Fig. 13. Original sample formed by LDED[76]
    Warping deformation of HEA formed by LPBF without improvement[92]
    Fig. 14. Warping deformation of HEA formed by LPBF without improvement[92]
    Samples formed by improved LPBF forming [92]
    Fig. 15. Samples formed by improved LPBF forming [92]
    Z-shape (left) and strip (right) scanning strategies[93]
    Fig. 16. Z-shape (left) and strip (right) scanning strategies[93]
    Nb3Ta3Mo(Ti2Ni)3 high entropy alloy impeller entity formed by LPBF[93]
    Fig. 17. Nb3Ta3Mo(Ti2Ni)3 high entropy alloy impeller entity formed by LPBF[93]
    ProcessCompositionCompressive yield strength Rec/MPaCompressive strength Rmc /MPaCompressive strain εtc /%Ref.
    SEBMWTaRe(in building direction)1181±711571±7116.60±1.8379
    SEBMWTaRe(perpendicular to building direction)1343±191762±4019.45±1.0579
    LDEDTaMoNb87411405.880
    LDEDW0.16TaMoNb8008402.580
    LDEDW0.33TaMoNb8108953.280
    LDEDW0.53TaMoNb8088903.480
    LPBFNbMoTaW119612374.681
    LPBF(NbMoTaW)99.5C0.517251728781
    LDEDTiZrNbHfTa(Stock 1)1460±30~19002282
    LDEDTiZrNbHfTa(Stock 2)1105±10>4082
    LDEDTiZrNb795±4>4082
    LDEDTi27Zr27Nb27Hf9.5Ta9.5910±50>4082
    LDEDTi42Zr22Nb22Hf7Ta7840±30>4082
    LPBFNbMoTa1252.561282.941571
    LPBFNbMoTaTi1201.481380.272371
    LPBFNbMoTaNi1350.191356.191171
    LPBFNbMoTaTi0.5Ni0.51750.462277.791571
    LPBFWTaMoNbV1391±16683
    LDEDCNTs/CoCrMoNbTi0.42110.52.3984
    LPBFRHEA011277.351597.629.587
    LPBFAl10Nb15Ta5Ti30Zr4014001700>4585
    LDEDAlMo0.5NbTa0.5TiZr2000236886
    LPBFNbMoTaTiNi1728275321.7588
    LPBFNbMoTaTiNi(HT1200)1502259633.5588
    LPBFNb3Ta3(Ti2Ni)4395±36>5089
    LPBFNb3Ta3Mo(Ti2Ni)3915±47>5089
    LPBFNb3Ta3Mo2(Ti2Ni)21285±56244727.1±2.689
    Table 1. Compression properties of AMed RHEAs
    ProcessCompositionTensile yield strength Re /MPaTensile strength Rm /MPaElongation after fracture A /%Ref.
    LPBFNbMoTaTiNi12050.8288
    LPBFNbMoTaTiNi(HT1100)11051.188
    LPBFNb3Ta3(Ti2Ni)4671±311036±179.2±0.689
    LPBFNb3Ta3Mo(Ti2Ni)31184±221403±354.4±0.789
    LPBFNb3Ta3Mo2(Ti2Ni)21212±160.82±0.0689
    LDEDTiNbCrVNi85210212.390
    LDEDTiZrHfNb0.878213.191
    LDEDTiZrHfNb10481091
    LDEDTiZrHfNb(in horizontal direction)103418.591
    Table 2. Tensile properties of AMed RHEAs
    ProcessCompositionRec /MPaRmc /MPaεtc /%Ref.
    LDEDTaMoNb(1000 ℃)5306848.580
    LPBFNbMoTaTi0.5Ni0.5 (600 ℃)1279.341669.7528.4271
    LPBFNbMoTaTi0.5Ni0.5(800 ℃)756.921033.632871
    LPBFNbMoTaTi0.5Ni0.5(1000 ℃)554.61651.361171
    LPBFRHEA01(600 ℃)1131.421207.21887
    LPBFRHEA01(800 ℃)693.341150.531087
    LPBFRHEA01(1000 ℃)724.45993.841087
    Table 3. Compression properties of AMed RHEAs at high temperature
    Dichen Li, Hang Zhang, Jianglong Cai. Development of Refractory High Entropy Alloys by Laser Additive Manufacturing: Regulating Material Properties and Manufacturing Processes (Invited)[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(1): 0102001
    Download Citation