Fig. 1. Test setup diagram. (a) Experimental processing system; (b) high-speed polygon mirror scanning device
Fig. 2. Relationship between burning aperture and logarithm of power
Fig. 3. Variation of burning aperture with increasing laser power
Fig. 4. Variation curves of hole inlet diameter, outlet diameter, and hole taper of 0.1 mm titanium alloy with laser incident power
Fig. 5. Variation of laser drilling depth and morphology with increasing laser power
Fig. 6. High-speed polygon mirror laser processing 0.3 mm titanium alloy micro group holes substrate. (a) Microhole arrays arrangement; (b) microhole arrays dislocation arrangement
Fig. 7. Variation of hole morphology with scanning speed. (a) Scanning speed is 160 m/s; (b) scanning speed is 500 m/s
Fig. 8. Medical titanium alloy microhole substrate covered and filled with povidone
Fig. 9. Quincunx spot structure
Fig. 10. Aperture comparison before and after process optimization. (a) Before optimization; (b) after optimization
Maximum input power /W | Laser pulse frequency /MHz | Laser pulse width /ns | Single pulse energy /mJ |
---|
500 | 0.500 | 120 | 1.00 | 500 | 0.500 | 240 | 1.00 | 500 | 1.000 | 60 | 0.50 | 500 | 2.000 | 30 | 0.25 |
|
Table 1. Specific parameters of laser
Maximum scanning speed /(m·s-1) | f-θ lens focal length /mm | Scanning range /(mm×mm) | Repeatability /μm | Focus spot /μm |
---|
1000 | 420 | 300×300 | ±5 | 35 |
|
Table 2. Specific parameters of scanning device
Scanning speed /(m·s-1) | Scanning range /(mm×mm) | Hole spacing / mm | Number of scans | Punch time /s |
---|
100 | 100×100 | 0.2 | 40 | 51 | 160 | 100×100 | 0.32 | 40 | 4 | 250 | 100×100 | 0.5 | 40 | 20 | 500 | 100×100 | 1.0 | 40 | 10 | 800 | 100×100 | 1.6 | 40 | 5 |
|
Table 3. Efficiency of micro group holes processed by the high-speed polygon mirror