Author Affiliations
1 Aeronautics Engineering College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, Shanxi 710038, China2 Unit 95084 of PLA, Foshan, Guangdong 528226, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Distribution of false alarm probability with different threshold noise ratio. (a) 0-4; (b) 5-6; (7) 6-7; (d) 12-13
Fig. 2. Distributions of noise probability and signal plus noise probability
Fig. 3. Detection probability versus detection range
Fig. 4. Detection probability versus target speed
Fig. 5. Detection probability versus atmospheric transmissivity
Fig. 6. Flow chart of range solution of threshold noise ratio based on detection distance
Fig. 7. Threshold noise ratio versus detection range
Fig. 8. Threshold noise ratio versus target speed
Fig. 9. Threshold noise ratio versus atmospheric transmissivity
Fig. 10. Detection distance envelope
Fig. 11. Detection probability envelope
Fig. 12. Detection probability envelope under variable or constant threshold noise ratio
τo | Δf /Hz | f /mm | F | ω | δ | D0 /mm | λ /μm |
---|
0.8 | 103 | 400 | 2 | 1.5°×1.0° | 0.9 | 200 | 3-5 |
|
Table 1. Parameters of IRST system
R /km | RTNR | Pd | Pfa |
---|
10-28 | 6.8 | 0.8-1 | 10-10 | 29-50 | 3-6.4 | 0.8 | 2.8×10-10-0.008 | 51-100 | 3 | 0.1-0.78 | 0.01 |
|
Table 2. Values of threshold noise ratio at different detection ranges
Vm /Ma | RTNR | Pd | Pfa |
---|
0-2.8 | 3 | 0.05-0.78 | 0.01 | 2.9-3.5 | 3.4-7 | 0.8 | 2.7×10-9-0.003 | 3.6-5 | 6.8 | 0.85-1 | 0.00001 |
|
Table 3. Values of threshold noise ratio under different object speeds
τ | RTNR | Pd | Pfa |
---|
0-0.58 | 3 | 0.02-0.79 | 0.01 | 0.59-1 | 3-4.2 | 0.8 | 0.0001-0.0095 |
|
Table 4. Values of threshold noise ratio with different atmospheric transmissivity