Yuanxin Tan, Haotian Lv, Jian Xu, Aodong Zhang, Yunpeng Song, Jianping Yu, Wei Chen, Yuexin Wan, Zhaoxiang Liu, Zhaohui Liu, Jia Qi, Yangjian Cai, Ya Cheng. Three-dimensional isotropic microfabrication in glass using spatiotemporal focusing of high-repetition-rate femtosecond laser pulses[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2023, 6(10): 230066

Search by keywords or author
- Opto-Electronic Advances
- Vol. 6, Issue 10, 230066 (2023)

Fig. 1. Schematic of the experimental layout. BS: beam splitter; M: mirror; G1–G4: diffraction gratings; L1–L4: lenses with different focal lengths; DM: dichroic mirror; OL: objective lens; SA: sample. The dashed rectangle indicates the proposed extra-cavity pulse stretcher.

Fig. 2. (a ) Numerically calculated and (e ) experimentally measured laser intensity distributions at the entrance aperture of the objective lens. (b –d ) Numerically calculated and (f –h ) experimentally measured intensity distributions near the focus of the objective lens in XY, XZ-and YZ planes, respectively. Scale bars in (e ) and (f –h ) are 1 mm and 10 µm, respectively.

Fig. 3. Schematics of the fabrication procedure with the SSTF scheme along (a ) x, (b ) y, and (c ) z directions, respectively. (d –f ) Cross-sectional, (g –i ) top-view, and (j –l ) side-view optical micrographs of lines along different directions. The pulse energy and writing speed were 8 µJ and 200 µm/s, respectively. Scale bar: 20 µm.

Fig. 4. The influence of pulse energy and writing speed on the fabrication resolution in the SSTF scheme. Cross-sectional optical micrographs of laser-inscribed lines in the glass along (a ) y and (b ) x directions with different pulse energies ranging from 4.7 µJ to 11.0 µJ. (c ) Lateral and longitudinal sizes of lines in XZ and YZ planes versus pulse energies. (d ) A laser-written line using segmented processing with different pulse energies ranging from 11.0 µJ to 4.7 µJ at a writing speed of 5 µm/s. The insets in (d) are the corresponding cross-sectional view optical micrographs. Cross-sectional optical micrographs of several lines inscribed along (e ) y and (f ) x directions at different writing speeds ranging from 0.2 mm/s to 9 mm/s, pulse energy was set at 8 µJ. (g ) Lateral and longitudinal resolutions versus writing speeds. Scale bars indicate 20 µm.

Fig. 5. The influence of processing depth on the fabrication resolution in the SSTF scheme. (a ) Schematic of inscribing lines in glass at different depths along the X and Y directions. Cross-sectional optical micrographs of the lines written along the (b ) X and (c ) Y directions, respectively. (d ) The lateral and longitudinal resolutions versus depth. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Fig. 6. (a ) Schematic of laser-inscribed lines in the glass when the objective lens was not immersed in water. Cross-sectional optical micrographs of the lines along (b ) Y and (c ) X directions at different pulse energies. The pulse energies varied from 14.8 µJ to 22.8 µJ from left to right in both (b) and (c). (d ) The lateral and longitudinal sizes in XZ and YZ planes versus pulse energies. Scale bar: 20 µm.

Fig. 7. (a –d ) Cross-sectional view and (e –g ) top-view optical micrographs of helical lines written throughout 1.6 mm thick glass at different pulse energies with the SSTF scheme. The writing speed was set at 200 μm/s, and the pulse energies from left to right were 9.5, 8.0, 7.2, and 6.2 µJ, respectively. (c ) and (d) Enlarged images of (b ) at different depths. (g) Enlarged image in (f ). Scale bar: 100 μm.

Fig. 8. (a ) Schematic of the fabrication procedure for 3D microchannel structures in glass by a combination of SSTF FLDW assisted etching, which consists of three main steps: (I) SSTF fs laser direct writing; (II) thermal annealing; (III) chemical etching. (b –d ) A meandering cooling structure microchannel. Optical micrographs of the channel structure (b) after FLDW followed by thermal annealing and (c) after etching. (d) An enlarged image in (c). (e –m ) A 3D multilayer microchannel network structure. Optical micrographs of the 3D network structure (e, h, k) after FLDW followed by thermal annealing and after etching in XY, XZ, and YZ planes. (g , j , m ) were enlarged images in (f , i , l ), respectively. (n –s ) 3D helical microchannel structures. The top-view (n ,o ) and side-view (q ,r ) optical micrographs of the 3D helical lines fabricated after FLDW followed by thermal annealing and after etching. (p ) and (s ) are enlarged images in (o) and (r), respectively. The insets in (d, g, j, m) are photographs of the microchannel structures. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address