Author Affiliations
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Image and Graphic Intelligent Processing, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Architecture of residual block
Fig. 2. Network architecture of proposed method
Fig. 3. Diagram of fusion strategy
Fig. 4. Decline curves of different loss functions in training process
Fig. 5. Framework of training process
Fig. 6. The first group of image fusion contrast experiments. (a) Infrared image; (b) visible image; (c) method in Ref. [15]; (d) method in Ref. [16]; (e) method in Ref. [17]; (f) method in Ref. [18]; (g) proposed method
Fig. 7. The second group of image fusion contrast experiments. (a) Infrared image; (b) visible image; (c) method in Ref. [15]; (d) method in Ref. [16]; (e) method in Ref. [17]; (f) method in Ref. [18]; (g) proposed method
Fig. 8. The third group of image fusion contrast experiments. (a) Infrared image; (b) visible image; (c) method in Ref. [15]; (d) method in Ref. [16]; (e) method in Ref. [17]; (f) method in Ref. [18]; (g) proposed method
Fig. 9. Partial results of image fusion contrast experiments. (a1)-(a6) Infrared images; (b1)-(b6) visible images; (c1)-(c6) method in Ref. [15]; (d1)-(d6) method in Ref. [16]; (e1)-(e6) method in Ref. [17]; (f1)-(f6) method in Ref. [18]; (g1)-(g6) proposed method
Fusion method | IE | SD | AG | MI |
---|
Method in Ref. [15] | 6.7072 | 37.049 | 3.5297 | 22.3850 | Method in Ref. [16] | 6.1381 | 32.436 | 3.3973 | 30.7770 | Method in Ref. [17] | 6.6984 | 33.590 | 3.3490 | 22.7620 | Method in Ref. [18] | 6.7510 | 35.192 | 3.4359 | 23.1432 | Proposed method | 6.6411 | 38.270 | 4.1455 | 31.8710 |
|
Table 1. Objective evaluation indicators of the first group of comparative experimental results
Fusion method | IE | SD | AG | MI |
---|
Method in Ref. [15] | 7.1000 | 53.673 | 3.8040 | 15.6260 | Method in Ref. [16] | 6.9540 | 49.513 | 4.2530 | 16.5480 | Method in Ref. [17] | 6.9710 | 52.781 | 3.7172 | 19.3090 | Method in Ref. [18] | 7.1947 | 51.664 | 4.4496 | 13.0329 | Proposed method | 7.4754 | 58.703 | 4.4842 | 24.5260 |
|
Table 2. Objective evaluation indicators of the second group of comparative experimental results
Fusion method | IE | SD | AG | MI |
---|
Method in Ref. [15] | 7.4114 | 39.817 | 3.0124 | 17.6580 | Method in Ref. [16] | 7.1459 | 35.916 | 3.6467 | 17.6800 | Method in Ref. [17] | 7.0764 | 34.879 | 3.1716 | 16.9430 | Method in Ref. [18] | 7.1703 | 37.727 | 3.3523 | 21.7977 | Proposed method | 7.3484 | 41.758 | 3.8451 | 27.3920 |
|
Table 3. Objective evaluation indicators of the third group of comparative experimental results