• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 58, Issue 4, 0415010 (2021)
Yufeng Wang1、2, Hongwei Wang2、3、*, Yu Liu2, Mingquan Yang2, and Jicheng Quan1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Naval Aviation, Yantai, Shandong 264001, China
  • 2Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • 3Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0415010 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Yufeng Wang, Hongwei Wang, Yu Liu, Mingquan Yang, Jicheng Quan. Algorithm for Stereo Matching Based on Multi-Task Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(4): 0415010 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall architecture of proposed algorithm
    Fig. 1. Overall architecture of proposed algorithm
    Architecture comparison of SPP and SPPSA. (a) SPP; (b) SPPSA
    Fig. 2. Architecture comparison of SPP and SPPSA. (a) SPP; (b) SPPSA
    Architecture of FEM
    Fig. 3. Architecture of FEM
    Architecture of DRM
    Fig. 4. Architecture of DRM
    Visual results of proposed algorithm. (a) Left image; (b) edge 1; (c) edge 2; (d) feature consistency map; (e) error map; (f) disparity map
    Fig. 5. Visual results of proposed algorithm. (a) Left image; (b) edge 1; (c) edge 2; (d) feature consistency map; (e) error map; (f) disparity map
    Number of iterationsEep /pixelED1 /%R1 /%R3 /%R5 /%frun /(frame·s-1)
    11.024.1211.674.633.3815.84
    20.853.5610.064.132.8212.22
    30.833.529.854.022.808.64
    40.823.469.623.872.816.22
    Table 1. Performance evaluation of algorithm under each number of DRM iterations
    Number of iterationsEep /pixelED1 /%R1 /%R3 /%R5 /%frun /(frame·s-1)
    ResBlock0.873.7510.484.322.9313.37
    SPP0.863.6210.004.222.8812.64
    SPPSA0.853.5610.064.132.8212.22
    Table 2. Performance evaluation of algorithm under different FEM settings
    Number of iterationsEep /pixelED1 /%R1 /%R3 /%R5 /%frun /(frame·s-1)
    None1.054.4812.364.943.5214.65
    Con1.004.1711.654.803.3213.58
    edge 1+Con0.883.8410.714.352.7612.46
    edge 2+Con0.893.8510.654.372.9813.23
    edge 1+edge 2+Con0.853.5610.064.132.8212.22
    Table 3. Performance evaluation of algorithm under different auxiliary task settings
    Training lossEep /pixelED1 /%R1 /%R3 /%R5 /%
    ap1.658.2727.968.656.02
    ap+edge1.487.5125.757.895.36
    ap+Con1.326.5621.726.864.75
    ap+edge+Con1.286.0419.956.234.09
    SL1+edge+Con0.712.5613.252.871.69
    Table 4. Performance evaluation under different training losses
    AlgorithmED1(All) /%ED1(Noc) /%Runtime /s
    bgfgAll areabgfgAll area
    M2S_CSPN[18]1.512.881.741.402.671.610.50
    EdgeStereo-V2[21]1.843.302.081.692.941.890.32
    WSMCnet[17]1.724.192.131.513.571.850.39
    SegStereo[19]1.884.072.251.763.702.080.60
    PSMNet[12]1.864.622.321.714.312.140.41
    iResNet-i2[9]2.253.402.444.113.724.050.12
    CRL[8]2.483.592.672.323.122.450.47
    GC-net[11]2.216.162.872.025.582.610.90
    MBFnet[22]2.594.802.962.224.142.540.05
    SGM-Net[6]2.668.643.662.237.443.0967.00
    MC-CNN-arct[2]2.898.883.892.487.643.3367.00
    DispNetC[7]4.324.414.344.113.724.050.06
    Proposed algorithm2.074.012.391.893.692.190.09
    Table 5. Performance evaluation of each algorithm on KITTI2015 test dataset
    DatasetK-valMQ-valETH-val
    Eep /pixelED1 /%Eep /pixelED1 /%Eep /pixelED1 /%
    Pretrained1.487.050.724.990.654.77
    K-train0.712.561.067.200.511.66
    MQ-train1.729.380.472.580.592.69
    ETH-train1.8410.851.328.360.321.26
    KME-train0.783.010.492.610.361.33
    Table 6. Performance evaluation on each dataset
    Yufeng Wang, Hongwei Wang, Yu Liu, Mingquan Yang, Jicheng Quan. Algorithm for Stereo Matching Based on Multi-Task Learning[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(4): 0415010
    Download Citation